Incorporating and Evaluating Voices in a Film Studies Thesis


  • Caroline Jane Coffin Open University



Academic Writing, academic sources and refencing, systemic functional linguistics


In academic writing, referencing sources is more than just a strategy for demonstrating scholarship. In thesis writing, for example, it plays an important role in making the writer’s argument persuasive. This investigation is concerned with the different ways in which thesis writers incorporate and evaluate diverse voices through academic referencing. First, it sets out an analytical framework underpinned by systemic functional linguistics (Halliday, 2004), particularly developments in appraisal theory (Martin and White, 2005). The framework provides a dialogic perspective on the linguistic options for referencing academic sources. The discussion then shows how the framework was used to conduct a detailed analysis of one doctoral student’s incorporation of academic sources in a successful Film Studies thesis. The analysis concludes with an illustrative list of referencing strategies used in theses and other types of academic writing. By reporting on how the conventions of referencing can be used in rhetorically effective ways, the research aims to make a contribution to the field of academic writing which is of practical as well as academic value.


Bakhtin, M. (1934–5/1981) The Dialogical Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. M. M. Holquist (ed.) (trans. C. Emerson and M. M. Holquist.) Austin: University of Texas Press.

Berkenkotter, C. and Huckin, T. (1995) Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Bordwell, D. (1989) Making Meaning: Inference and Rhetoric in the Interpretation of Cinema. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1985/1994/2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.

Hewings, A. (1999) Disciplinary Engagement in Undergraduate Writing: An Investigation of Clause-Initial Elements in Geography Essays. Unpublished PhD Thesis. The University of Birmingham.

Hyland, K. (2000) Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interaction in Academic Writing. London: Longman.

Martin, J. R. and White, P. R. R. (2005) The Language of Evaluation. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Myers. G. (1990) Writing Biology: Texts in the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

North, S. P. (2003) Emergent Disciplinarity in an Interdisciplinary Course: Theme Use in Undergraduate Essays in the History of Science. Unpublished PhD Thesis. The Open University.

Shaw, P. (1992) Reasons for the correlation of voice, tense and sentence function in reporting verbs. Applied Linguistics 13: 302–319.

Swales, J. (1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Thompson, G. (1996) Voices in the text: Discourse perspectives on language reports. Applied Linguistics 17: 501–30.

Tucker, P. (2003) Evaluation in the art-historical research article. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2: 291–312.

Van Leeuwen, T. (1996) The representation of social actors. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard and M. Coulthard (eds) Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis 32–70. London: Routledge.

White, P. R. R. (2003) Beyond modality and hedging: A dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance. Text, Special Edition on Appraisal 23(3): 259–284.



How to Cite

Coffin, C. J. (2010). Incorporating and Evaluating Voices in a Film Studies Thesis. Writing and Pedagogy, 1(2), 163–193.



Research Matters