Mullā Ṣadrā on the Effective Prayer and God’s Mutability and Passibility
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/rst.27361Keywords:
petitionary prayer, Mullā Ṣadrā, mutability, passibility, ADMAbstract
This article tries to bring Mullā Ṣadrā to a current debate in the philosophy of religion regarding effective petitionary prayer. Here the question relates to the efficacy of petitionary prayer and the two divine attributes of immutability and impassibility. On the one hand, according to some religious texts and also the common sense of supplicants, one is inclined to think that petitionary prayer is efficient in the sense that it can influence God’s will and action, and on the other hand, traditional theism insists that God is Immutable and Impassible, neither He can change nor is influenced by His creature. Drawing on Mullā Ṣadrā’s ideas and works against the background of his transcendent metaphysical framework, we try to present a new model of answering prayers named the “answering-by-disclosure” model (ADM). In ADM, one can truly ascribe mutability and passibility to God without damaging His transcendence and glory. By accepting the transcendent mutability and possibility of God, we can think of His mutual interaction with the world, openly and transcendently hearing and answering the prayers of His servants. The prayer is a key to disclosing what is hidden on both sides: the poverty and neediness of petitioners and the perfections (mercy, power, etc.) of the petitioned.
References
Alston, W. P. 1985. “Divine- Human Dialogue and the Nature of God.” Faith and Philosophy 2(1): 5–20. https://doi.org/10.5840 /faithphil19852114
Aquinas, S. T. and Bourke, V. J. 1956. On the Truth of the Catholic Faith: Summa Contra Gentiles, Book Three: Providence, Part II. New York: Image Books.
Avicenna. 2000. Al- Taʻlīqāt, edited by ‘A. Badawī. Qom: Intishārāt Daftar Tablīghāt Islāmī.
————. 2004. Dānishnameh ‘alā’ī, ed. Mohammad Moeen. Hamedan: Bu- Ali Sina University.
Azadegan, E. 2022. “On the Incompatibility of God’s Knowledge of Particulars and the Doctrine of Divine Immutability.” Religious Studies 58(2): 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412520000414
Barrick. W. D. 2001. “The Openness of God: Does Prayer Change God?” The Master’s Seminary Journal 12(2): 149–166. https://tms.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/tmsj12g.pdf
Castelo, D. 2019. “Qualified Impassibility.” In Robert J Matz and A. Chadwick Thornhill (eds), Divine Impassibility: Four Views of God’s Emotion and Suffering, 53–86. InterVarsity Press: Downers Grove.
Davies, B. (2016) Thomas Aquinas’s Summa Contra Gentiles: A Guide and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Davison, Scott A. 2017. Petitionary Prayer: A Philosophical Investigation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Di Muzio G. 2018. “A Collaborative Model of Petitionary Prayer.” Religious Studies 54(1): 37–54.
Fakhar Noghani, V. and Rastin Toroghi, A. 2023. “Explaining the Philosophical Problem of Answered Prayer based on Answering-by-Disclosure Model (ADM).” Philosophy of Religion Research 21(2): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.30497/prr.2023.243422.1787
Fanārī, S. M. 1995. Miṣbāḥ al- Uns Bayn al- Maʿqūl wa al- Mashhūd. Edited by A. I. Alkayali. Beirut: Dār al- Kutub al-ʿIlmīyya.
Hillī, Ḥ. b. Y. 2007. Kashf al- Murād. Translated and annotated by A. Shirwani. Qom: Dār al- ʿIlm.
Javadi Amoli, A. 2019. Raḥīq makhtūm: SharḥḤikmat Mutaʿālīyya, vol. 1– 1. Edited by H. Parsania. Qom: Esra International Foundation for Revealed Sciences.
Knasas, John F. X. 1983. “Aquinas: Prayer to An Immutable God.” New Scholasticism 57 (2): 196–221. https://doi.org/10.5840/newscholas198357223
Lewis. R. Q. 2021. “Petitionary Prayer— Caught in the Chaos of Strange Attractors: A Study of Divine Action in the Writings of John Polkinghorne.” Theology and Science, 19(3), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2021.1944511
Mander, W. J. 2007. “Theism, Pantheism, and Petitionary Prayer.” Religious Studies 43(3): 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003441250700892X
Matz, R. J. and Thornhill, A. C. (eds.). Divine Impassibility: Four Views of God’s Emotion and Suffering. InterVarsity Press: Downers Grove.
Meisami, S. 2015. “Mullā Ṣadrā on the Efficacy of Prayer.” Journal of Sufi Studies 4(1/2): 59–83. https://doi.org/10.1163/22105956-12341276
Mīrdāmād, M. B. 2002. Musannafāt. Compiled by Abdullah Noorani, introduction by Mehdi Mohaghegh. Tehran: Society for the National Heritage of Iran.
Mullā Ṣadrā. 1975. Al- Mabdaʼ Wa Al- Ma‘ād. Edited by J. al- Din Ashtiyani. Tehran: Islamic Institute for Research in Philosophy.
————. 1981. Al- Ḥikma al- Mutaʿālīya fī al- Asfār al- ʿAqliyya al- Arbaʿa (known as Asfār), 9 vols, Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth.
————. 1984. Mafātīh al- Ghayb, ed. Muḥammad Khajāwī. Tehran: Muʾassisi-ye Taḥqīqāt-I Farhangī.
————. 1987. Tafsīr al- Qurʾān al- Karīm. Edited by M. Khajāwī 2nd edition, 7 vols, Qom: Intishārāt Bīdār.
————. 1999. Risālah fī al- ḥudūth, ed. H. Mousavian. Tehran: Sadra Islamic Philosophy Foundation.
————. 2004. Sharh Usū l al- Kāfī, ed. Muhammad Khajawi, 1st edition, 4 vols, Tehran: Muʾassisi-ye Mutạ̄ liʿāt wa-Taḥqīqāt Farhangī.
————. 2010. Majmuʿi- ye rasaʾil- i falsafī, ed. Muhammad Khamenei, Saeed Nazari Tavakoli, Ali Asgharjafari, Mehdi Dehbashi and Kazem Mudir Shanechi. 1st edition, 4 vols. Tehran: Sadra Islamic Philosophy Foundation.
————. 2009a. Al- Shawāhid Al- Rubūbīyya fī Al- Manāhij Al- Sulūkiyya. Edited by J. Ashtiyānī, 5th edition. Qom: Bustan Ketab.
————. 2009b. Se Risāle- ye Falsafī. Edited by J. Ashtiyānī, 4th edition. Qom: Bustan Ketab.
————. n.d. Al- Rasāʾil. Qom: Maktaba al- Muṣṭfawī.
Peckham, J. 2019. “Qualified Possibility.” In Robert J Matz and A. Chadwick Thornhill (eds.), Divine Impassibility: Four Views of God’s Emotion and Suffering, pp. 87–128. InterVarsity Press: Downers Grove.
Pickup, M. (2018). “Answer to our Prayers: The Unsolved but Solvable Problem of Petitionary Prayer.” Faith and Philosophy, 35(1), 84–104. https://doi.org/10.5840/faithphil201811193
Qayṣarī, D. 1996. Sharḥ Fuṣūṣ al- Ḥikam. Edited by J. Ashtiyānī. Tehran: Intishārāt ‘Ilmī wa Farhangī.
Rastin Toroghi, A. 2022. “The Evidence and Principles of the Theory of Self-Revelation of the Soul in Mullā Ṣadrā’s Philosophy.” Essays in Philosophy and Kalam 53(2): 159–178. https://doi.org/10.22067/epk.2022.77525.1147
Rastin Toroghi, A., Hosseini Shahrudi, S. M., and Pooyanejad, S. 2021. “Do We Go Back to Where We Came From? Mullā Ṣadrā’s Philosophical Exegesis on the Paradise of Adam and the Promised Paradise of the Afterlife.” Qur’anic Studies 23(3): 103–132. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2021.0480
Rūmī, J. 1983. Mathnawī- yi Maʿnawī, ed. M. Estelami (ed.) 7 vols. Tehran: Zuwar.
Scrutton, A. 2013. “Divine Passibility: God and Emotion.” Philosophy Compass 8(9): 866–874. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12065
Stump, Eleonore. 1979. “Petitionary Prayer.” American Philosophical Quarterly 16(2): 81–91. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20009745
Ṭabāṭabāʾī, S.M.Ḥ. 2006. Nihāyat al- ḥikmah. Edited and revised by G. Fayyāḍī. 4 vols. Qom: Markaz Intishārāt-i Muʾassasa-yi Imām Khomeinī.
Timpe, Kevin. 2000. “Toward a Process Philosophy of Petitionary Prayer.” Philosophy and Theology 12(2): 397–418. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtheol200012224
Velde, Rudi. 2013. “Thomas Aquinas’s Understanding of Prayer in the Light of the Doctrine of Creatio Ex Nihilo.” Modern Theology 29(2): 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12021
Wink, W. 1992. Engaging the Powers: Discernment and Resistance in a World of Domination. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
Yousef Thani, S. M. and Zahmatkesh, H. 2011. “Divine Names and Attributes in Islamic Mysticism with Special Reference to Imam Khomeini’s Viewpoints” [Asmāʾ wa ṣifāt- e ilāhī dar Irfān- e islāmī bā rūykardī be ārāʾ imam khumeinī], Matin, 14(54): 141–160. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.24236462.1391.14.54.6.3
