Getting into the mind of Medhatithi
The arguments on corporal punishment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/rosa.25456Keywords:
Sanskrit Jurisprudence, Mīmāṃsā, Dharmaśāstra, Sanskrit Philosophy, Medhātithi, MānavadharmaśāstraAbstract
This paper analyses Medhatithi’s discussion of corporal punishment, with special reference to the debate staged in his commentary on MDh 8.318. His arguments are extremely sophisticated, especially because of the application of Mimamsa-influenced reasoning rules. The paper makes implicit steps and unspoken hypotheses explicit and highlights the selection process through which Medhatithi finally selects one solution to the controversy he examines over the others. For some instances of possible candidates: Is analogical reasoning able to provide stronger support than, for example, authoritative statements? What role does inner consistency play? Which criterion wins in case of conflicts among different textual passages? To test the inner-consistency criterion, the paper tackles the issue of corporal punishment as discussed in different contexts and tries to solve the seeming clashes that arise when different texts by Medhatithi are juxtaposed. It concludes by seeing Medhatithi’s commentary on MDh 8.318 as the culmination of a systematisation attempt regarding all cases of corporal punishment as distinctly ordained based on the purpose to be achieved.
References
Bronner, Yigal and Lawrence McCrea. 2021. First Words, Last Words: New Theories for Reading Old Texts in Sixteenth-Century India. American Academy of Religion. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ferrante, Marco and Elisa Freschi (forthcoming). ‘The Principle of Suspension (badha) in Early Mimamsa: Prapta- and Apraptabadha’.
Freschi, Elisa and Matteo Pascucci. 2021. ‘Deontic Concepts and their Clash in Mimamsa: Towards an Interpretation’. Theoria 87 (3): 659–703. https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12307
Freschi, Elisa and Tiziana Pontillo. 2013. Rule-Extension Strategies in Ancient India: Srautasutra, Mimamsa and Grammar on Tantra- and Prasanga-Principles. Vienna: Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-03048-8
Jha, Ganganatha (ed.). 1932–1939. Manu-smrti. With the `Manubhasya’ of Medhatithi. Edited with the help of several manuscripts. Calcutta: Royal Asiatic Society.
Jha, Ganganatha (ed.). 1999. Manusmrti. With the ‘Manubhasya’ of Medhatithi. English translation. 2nd edition (1st Calcutta 1920–39). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Mandlik, Vishvanath Narayan (ed.). 1886. Manavadharmasastra with the commentaries of Medhatithi, Sarvajñanarayana, Kulluka, Raghavananda, Nandana and Ramacandra. Bombay: Ganpat Krishnaji’s Press.
McClish, Mark. 2019. The History of the Arthasastra: Sovereignty and Sacred Law in Ancient India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Olivelle, Patrick (ed.). n.d. Searchable Electronic Edition of the Manubhasya Commentary of Medhatithi on the Manava-dharmasastra, Transcribed, Edited, Formatted, and Color-Coded by Patrick Olivelle. https://sites.utexas.edu/sanskrit/resources/dharmasastra/medhatithi
Yoshimizu, Kiyotaka. 2012. ‘Kumarila and Medhatithi on the Authority of Codified Sources of dharma’. In François Voegeli et al. (eds), Devadattiyam. Johannes Bronkhorst Felicitation Volume: 643–81. Bern: Peter Lang.
——2022. ‘Arthapatti in Kumarila’s Tantravarttika.’ In Peter M. Scharf (ed.), Indian Linguistic Studies in Honor of George Cardona. Volume II. Historical Linguistics, Vedic, etc.: 489–522. Providence, RI: The Sanskrit Library.
