How to Change Law in Classical India
Hermeneutics in the Service of the Legal Profession
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/rosa.25453Keywords:
law, dharma, smṛti, Mīmāṃsā, Yuga, śiṣṭaAbstract
In his celebrated book The Concept of Law, H. L. A. Hart posits three secondary rules in a legal system: recognition, change, and adjudication. In this paper, I look at the second category: the means provided within the Indian legal system by which laws, in this case dharma, can be changed. The category of recognition provides us with means of knowing what the laws are. In modern systems, this is done through the passage of laws in a duly constituted legislature. The ancient Indian system did not have a provision for a legislative body. Instead, law as dharma was to be discovered rather than enacted: it was thought to be found in the Veda (vedamulatva concept) and, secondarily, in the texts known as smrtis. Law is thus eternal and, in theory, immutable; it cannot be changed. But, in spite of the theory, society and culture do change and demand laws that reflect those changes. The hermeneutical tradition of India provided means by which such change, foreclosed de jure, could be enacted de facto. This paper will analyse several of these techniques, including the yuga theory, the dharma of smaller social and geographical units, and, quite interestingly, the opprobrium of the people
(lokavidvista).
References
Primary Sources
Apararka, Commentary on the Yajñavalkya Smrti. Ed. Narayana Apte. 2 vols. Anandasrama Sanskrit Series, 46. Poona, 1903.
Bharuci. Bharuci-pranitam Manusastravivaranam. Ed. S. Jagannatha. Mysore: Oriental Research Institute, University of Mysore, 2020.
Brhaspati Smrti. Ed. in K. V. Rangaswami Aiyangar, Brhaspati-Smrti (Reconstructed). Gaekwad’s Oriental Series, 85. Baroda: Oriental Institute. 1941. Tr. in Jolly 1889.
Devana Bhatta, Smrticandrika. Ed. L. Srinivasacharya. 6 parts. Mysore: Government Branch Press, 1914–21. Tr. J. R. Gharpure. 6 parts. Bombay: Collection of Hindu Law Texts, 1946–55.
Kautilya. Arthasastra. Ed. in Kangle 1969. Tr. in Olivelle 2013.
Madhava, Parasara-Madhaviya. Ed. Vaman Sastri Islampurkar. 3 vols. Bombay: 1892–1919. Ed. Chandrakanta Tarkalankara. 3 vols. Calcutta, Asiatic Society: 1883–99.
Medhatithi. Commentary on the Manu Smrti. Ed. Ganganath Jha. 2 vols. Calcutta, 1920. Reprint. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1999.
Narada Smrti. Ed. and tr. in Lariviere 1989. Tr. in Jolly 1889.
Parasara Smrti. Ed. in Madhava, Parasara-Madhaviya (above).
Satapatha Brahmana. Ed. Albrecht Weber. Berlin: Dümmler; London: Williams and Norgate, 1849. Tr. Julius Eggeling. 5 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1882–1900.
Vacanamala, sub-commentary on Visvarupa’s Balakrida on the Yajñavalkya Smrti. Cited by the page numbers of my forthcoming new edition of the work (Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass).
Vijñanesvara, Mitaksara, commentary on YDh. Ed. Wasudev Laxman Sastri Pansikar. Bombay: Nirnaya Sagar Press, 1936.
Visvarupa. Balakrida commentary on the Yajñavalkya Smrti. Ed. T. Ganapati Sastri. Trivandrum Sanskrit Series, 74, 81. Trivandrum, 1921–1922.
Secondary Sources
Brick, David. 2010. ‘The Dharmasastric Debate on Widow Burning.’ Journal of the American Oriental Society 130: 203–23.
Hart, H. L. A. 2012 [1961]. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jolly, Julius. 1889. The Minor Law-Books: Part I, Narada. Brhaspati. Sacred Books of the East, 33. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Kangle, R. P. 1969. The Kautiliya Arthasastra. Part I: A Critical Edition and Glossary. 2nd ed. (1st ed. 1960). Bombay: University of Bombay.
Lariviere, Richard W. 2009. ‘Dharmasastra, Custom, “Real Law” and “Aprocryphal Smrtis”. ’ In Olivelle (2009b: 189–205).
Olivelle, Patrick. 2000. The Dharmasutras of Apastamba, Gautama, Baudhayana, and Vasistha. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
——2005. Manu’s Code of Law: A Critical Edition and Translation of the Manava-Dharmasastra. New York: Oxford University Press.
——2009a. Visnu’s Code of Law: A Critical Edition and Translation of the Vaisnava-Dharmasastra. Harvard Oriental Series, No. 73. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Reprinted: Delhi: Primus Books, 2018.
——(ed.) 2009b. Dharma: Studies in Its Semantic, Cultural, and Religious History. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
——2013. King, Governance, and Law in Ancient India: Kautilya’s Arthasastra. New York: Oxford University Press.
——2019. Yajnavalkya: Treatise on Dharma. Ed. and tr. of the Yajñavalkya Dharmasastra. Murty Classical Library of India. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Olivelle, Patrick and Mark McClish. 2015. ‘The Four Feet of Legal Procedure and the Origins of Jurisprudence in Ancient India.’ Journal of the American Oriental Society 135: 33–47. https://doi.org/10.7817/jameroriesoci.135.1.33
Rocher, Ludo. 1979. ‘The Introduction to the Gautamadharmasutra.’ Adyar Library Bulletin 39: 90–100.
Unni, N. P. 2003. Sankarasmrti (Laghudharmaprakasika). Corpus Iuris Sanscriticum, IV. Torino.
Wezler, Albrecht. 2009. ‘Dharma in the Veda and the Dharmasastras.’ In Olivelle (2009b: 207–32).
Wiese, Harald and Sadananda Das. 2019. The Charter of Visnusena. Halle: Universitätsverlag Halle-Wittenberg.
