The Cultural Matrix of the Online Hindutva Discourse in India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/rosa.18332Keywords:
Balkanization, (Counter)Public Sphere, Digital Hindu, Digital India, Filter Bubble, HindutvaAbstract
The promise of ‘Digital India’ has, on the one hand, supplied a new vocabulary of political participation, and, on the other hand, consolidated techniques of statist control. Taking off from here, this article examines the constituency of the Hindutva discourse online, and how the performativity of Hindutva reconfigures the digital public sphere. It seeks to understand: How do the ideologues of Hindutva territorialize certain online spaces? How does the Internet equip them with new imaginations and vocabulary of political partisanship? How does this provoke the political Other—the counterpublics—against which their identity is recast and amplified? These three questions constitute the central problematic of the article.
References
Adamic, Lada A., and Natalie Glance. 2005. ‘The Political Blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. Election: Divided They Blog.’ In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Link Discovery: 36–43.
Arterton, Christopher F. 1987. Teledemocracy: Can Technology Protect Democracy. London: Sage.
Banaji, Shakuntala. 2018. ‘Vigilante Publics: Orientalism, Modernity and Hindutva Fascism in India.’ Javnost—The Public 25 (4): 333–50.
Banaji, Shakuntala, and David Buckingham. 2013. The Civic Web: Young People, the Internet, and Civic Participation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bhabha, Homi K. 1990. Nation and Narration. London: Routledge.
Bhagchandani, Rahul. 2013. ‘46% Of Narendra Modi’s Twitter Followers Don’t Have a Profile Picture. Are They Fake?’ Youth Connect. Web: https://bit.ly/2H0Su6u (accessed 15 January, 2018).
Bhargava, Rajeev (ed.). 1998. Secularism and Its Critics. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2014. On the State: Lectures at the College de France 1989–1992. Malden, MA: Polity.
Castells, Manuel. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age. Vol. 1 of Economy, Society, and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.
Chun, Wendy. 2018. ‘Queerying Homophily.’ In Clemens Apprich, Wendy Hui Kyong Chun, Florian Cramer, and Hito Steyerl, Pattern Discrimination: 59–97. Luneburg: Meson Press.
Cohn, Bernard. 1996. Colonialism and Its Forms of Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Conover, Michael D., Jacob Ratkiewicz, M. Francisco, B. Gonçalves, F. Menczer, and A. Flammini. 2011. ‘Political Polarization on Twitter.’ In Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media: 89–96.
Fiorina, Morris P., and Samuel J. Abrams. 2008. ‘Political Polarization in the American Public.’ Annual Review in Political Science 11: 563–88.
Fraser, Nancy. 1990. ‘Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.’ Social Text 25/26: 56–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/466240
Gitlin, Todd. 1998. ‘Public Sphere or Public Sphericules?’ In Media, Ritual, Identity: 168–75. London: Routledge.
Gladwell, Malcolm. 2010. ‘Small Change: Why the Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted.’ The New Yorker. Web: https://bit.ly/1Csy7XO (accessed 15 January, 2018).
Golwalkar, Madhav S. 1939. We, or Our Nationhood Defined. Nagpur: Bharat Publications.
Graham, Mark. 2013. ‘Geography/Internet: Ethereal Alternate Dimensions of Cyberspace or Grounded Augmented Realities?’ The Geographical Journal 179 (2): 177–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12009
Graham, Stephen. 1998. ‘The End of Geography or the Explosion of Place? Conceptualizing Space, Place and Information Technology.’ Progress in Human Geography 22 (2): 165–85. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913298671334137
Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon Press.
Hacking, Ian. 1999. The Social Construction of What. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hansen, Thomas Blom. 1999. The Saffron Wave: Democracy and Hindu Nationalism in Modern India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hargittai, Eszter, Jason Gallo and Matthew Kane. 2008. ‘Cross-ideological Discussions among Conservative and Liberal Bloggers.’ Public Choice 134 (1): 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-007-9201-x
Helland, Christopher. 2005. ‘Online Religion as Lived Religion: Methodological Issues in the Study of Religious Participation on the Internet.’ Heidelberg Journal of Religions on the Internet 1 (1): 1–16.
Jaffrelot, Christophe. 1998. The Hindu Nationalist Movement in India. New York: Columbia University Press.
JantaKa Reporter. ‘Hindutva Supporters Rejoice Gauri Lankesh’s Murder, BJP IT Cell Chief’s Old Tweet Goes Viral.’ 6 September, 2017. Web: https://bit.ly/2JOA9aD (accessed 15 January, 2018).
Jenkins, Keith (ed.). 1997. The Postmodern History Reader. London and New York: Routledge.
Lal, Vinay, and Borin van Loon. 2001. Introducing Hinduism. London: Icon Books.
McCarty, Nolan M., Keith T. Poole and Howard Rosenthal. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Millard, William B. 1997. ‘I Flamed Freud: A Case Study in Teletexual Incendiarism.’ In D. Porter (ed.), Internet Culture: 145–59. New York: Routledge.
Mohan, Sriram. 2015. ‘Locating the “Internet Hindu”: Political Speech and Performance in Indian Cyberspace.’ Television & New Media 16 (4): 339–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476415575491
Morozov, Evgeny 2009. ‘The Brave New World of Slacktivism.’ Foreign Policy. 19 May, 2009. Web: https://bit.ly/1xnbbqk (accessed 15 January, 2020).
Mutz, Diana C., and Lori Young. 2011. ‘Communication and Public Opinion: Plus Ça Change?’ Public Opinion Quarterly 75 (5): 1018–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfr052
Nandy, Ashis. 1988. ‘The Politics of Secularism and the Recovery of Religious Tolerance.’ Alternatives 13 (2): 177–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/030437548801300202
—1997a. ‘Facing Extermination: A Report on the Present State of the Gods and Goddesses in South Asia.’ Manushi: A Journal about Women and Society 99: 5–19.
—1997b. ‘The Twilight of Certitudes: Secularism, Hindu Nationalism and Other Masks of Deculturation.’ Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 22 (2): 157–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/030437549702200201
Narayan, Badri. 2011. The Making of the Dalit Public Sphere in North India: Uttar Pradesh, 1950–Present. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Nesbitt, Eleanor. 2005. Sikhism: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nguyen, Dan T., and Jon Alexander. 1996. ‘The Coming of Cyberspacetime and the End of the Polity.’ In Robert M. Shields (ed.), Cultures of Internet: Virtual Spaces, Real Histories, Living Bodies: 99–123. London: Sage.
Pariser, Eli. 2011. The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web Is Changing What We Read and How We Think. London: Penguin Press.
Phillips, Whitney. 2015. This Is Why We Can’t Have Nice Things: Mapping the Relationship between Online Trolling and Mainstream Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Plummer, Ken. 2003. Intimate Citizenship: Private Decisions and Public Dialogues. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press.
Poster, Mark. 1995. The Second Media Age. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
—1997. ‘Cyberdemocracy: The Internet and the Public Sphere.’ In David Holmes (ed.), Virtual Politics: Identity and Community in Cyberspace: 212–29. London: SAGE.
Quora. ‘Is It Wrong if I Am a Pro-Hindutva Indian?’ Web: https://bit.ly/2vfuAhU (accessed 15 January, 2020).
Rafaeli, Sheizaf, and Fay Sudweeks. 1997. ‘Networked Interactivity.’ Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 2 (4). Web: https://bit.ly/2JOtn4n (accessed 15 January, 2020).
Reddit.com. ‘Hindutva Supporters Rejoice Gauri Lankesh’s Murder, BJP IT Cell Chief’s Old Tweet Goes Viral.’ Web: https://bit.ly/2IXyspM (accessed 15 January, 2020).
Reddit.com. ‘Kamal Haasan Should Be “Shot Dead” for His Hindu “Terror” Remark, Says Hindu Mahasabha—Times of India.’ Web: https://bit.ly/2Hr3hGi (accessed 15 January, 2020).
Robins, Kevin. 1996. ‘Cyberspace and the World We Live in.’ In Mike Featherstone and Roger Burrows (eds.), Cyberspace, Cyberbodies and Cyberpunk: Cultures of Technological Embodiment: 135–55. London: Sage.
Savarkar, Vinayak D. 1923. Hindutva: Who Is a Hindu? Bombay: Veer SavarkarPrakashan.
—1945. Hindu Rashtravad. Rohtak: Satya Prakash.
Sclove, Richard E. 1995. Democracy and Technology. New York: Guilford Press.
Sparks, Holloway. 1997. ‘Dissident Citizenship: Democratic Theory, Political Courage, and Activist Women.’ Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 12 (4): 74–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1997.tb00299.x
Spivak, Gayatri C., and Judith Butler. 2007. Who Sings the Nation-State? Language, Politics, Belonging. New York: Seagull Books.
Spivak, Gayatri C. 1990. The Post-Colonial Critic: Interviews, Strategies, Dialogues. New York: Routledge.
The Times of India. ‘Kamal Haasan Should Be “Shot Dead” for His Hindu “Terror” Remark, Says Hindu Mahasabha.’ 4 November, 2017. Web: https://bit.ly/2qunzF5 (accessed 15 January, 2020).
Therwath, Ingrid. 2012. ‘Cyber-Hindutva: Hindu Nationalism, the Diaspora and the Web.’ Social Science Information 1 (4): 551–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018412456782
Turkle, Sherry. 2011. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic Books.
Udupa, Sahana. 2018. ‘Enterprise Hindutva and Social Media in Urban India.’ Contemporary South Asia 26 (4): 453–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/09584935.2018.1545007
Wilhelm, Anthony G. 1999. ‘Virtual Sounding Boards: How Deliberative Is Online Political Discussion?’ In Barry N. Hague and Brian D. Loader (eds.), Digital Democracy: Discourse and Decision Making in the Information Age: 154–78. London: Routledge.
Woolley, Samuel, and Philip N. Howard. 2016. ‘Social Media, Revolution, and the Rise of the Political Bot.’ In Piers Robinson, Philip Seib and Romy Frohlich (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Media, Conflict, and Security: 282–92. New York: Routledge.
