Patrilocality in the Harivamsa’s Visnuparvan

Authors

  • Simon Brodbeck Cardiff University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/rosa.19011

Keywords:

abduction, Baladeva, Harivaṃśa, in-laws, Kṛṣṇa, patrilocality, wives

Abstract

This article suggests that the principle of patrilocality, as espoused by Krsna and Baladeva, can be applied as an interpretive frame to almost all of the narrative material that Vaisampayana presents to Janamejaya in the Harivamsa’s Visnuparvan (Hv 46–113), and that the principle of patrilocality is thus a key theme of the Visnuparvan, with Krsna and Baladeva as its heroes. This suggestion is supported by an overview of the Visnuparvan’s narrative from beginning to end, in eleven sections which repeatedly feature—or can be interpreted to feature—conflict with in-law families about where a couple will have children, and which of the two families the children will be raised for.

Author Biography

Simon Brodbeck, Cardiff University

Simon Brodbeck is a Reader in Religious Studies at Cardiff University, specializing in the study of the Sanskrit Mahābhārata.

References

Allen, Nicholas J. et al. (eds). 2011. Early Human Kinship: from Sex to Social Reproduction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Austin, Christopher R. 2014. ‘The Abduction of Sri-Rukmini: Politics, Genealogy and Theology in Harivamsa 87–90.’ Religious Studies and Theology 33 (1): 23–46. https://doi.org/10.1558/rsth.v33i1.23

—— 2018. ‘The Abducted Male: Sexual Conquest, Lineage and Divinity in the Narratives of Pradyumna and Aniruddha.’ In Diana Dimitrova and Tatiana Oranskaia (eds), Rethinking the Body in South Asian Traditions: 10–26. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351123624-2

—— 2019. ‘Krsna’s Son Pradyumna as Kama and Mayin in the “Karsna” Puranas.’ In Raj Balkaran and McComas Taylor (eds), Puranic Studies: Proceedings of the Purana Section of the 17th World Sanskrit Conference, July 9–13, 2018: 79–95. https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/70440/items/1.0379613

—— 2020. ‘The Corporeal Vamsa: Seizure and Restriction of the Body in the Harivamsa.’ In Diana Dimitrova (ed.), Rethinking the Body in South Asian Traditions: 10–26. London: Routledge.

Bachofen, J. J. 1967 [1926]. Myth, Religion, and Mother Right: Selected Writings. Trans. Ralph Manheim. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Das Mutterrecht first published 1861.

Balkaran, Raj. 2019. The Goddess and the King in Indian Myth: Ring Composition, Royal Power, and the Dharmic Double Helix. Routledge Hindu Studies Series. London: Routledge.

Barras, Colin. 2019. ‘History of Violence.’ New Scientist 3223 (30 March): 29–33.

Brereton, Joel P. 1999. ‘Edifying Puzzlement: Rgveda 10.129 and the Uses of Enigma.’ Journal of the American Oriental Society 119 (2): 248–60. https://doi.org/10.2307/606109

Brinkhaus, Horst. 2012. ‘The 16,108 Wives of Krsna in the Harivamsa.’ In John Brockington (ed.), Battle, Bards and Brahmins: Papers of the 13th World Sanskrit Conference, Vol. 2: 315–28. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

Brodbeck, Simon. 2006. ‘Ekalavya and Mahabharata 1.121–28.’ International Journal of Hindu Studies 10 (1): 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11407-006-9000-x

—— 2009. The Mahabharata Patriline: Gender, Culture, and the Royal Hereditary. Farnham: Ashgate.

—— 2011. ‘Solar and Lunar Lines in the Mahabharata.’ Religions of South Asia 5 (1–2): 127–52.

—— 2014. ‘Refuge and Reform: Snakes, Gleaners, and Nisadas in Early Kavya.’ In Giovanni Ciotti, Alastair Gornall and Paolo Visigalli (eds), Puspika: Tracing Ancient India through Texts and Traditions. Contributions to Current Research in Indology, Volume 2: Proceedings of the Second International Graduate Research Symposium (September 2010, Cambridge): 1–34. Oxford: Oxbow Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv13nb9pr.4

—— (trans.). 2019. Krishna’s Lineage: the Harivamsha of Vyasa’s Mahabharata, Translated from the Sanskrit. New York: Oxford University Press.

—— 2021. ‘Interpretation of Baladeva and Yamuna at Harivamsa 83.’ International Journal of Hindu Studies 24 (3): 313–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11407-020-09281-5

Chilton, Charles, Theatre Workshop and the members of the original cast. 1965. Oh What a Lovely War. London: Methuen.

Couture, André. 2017. ‘Krsna, Kalayavana et la migration des Yadava de Mathura à Dvaraka.’ Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Inscriptions & Belles-Lettres: 947–67.

Douglas, Mary. 2007. Thinking in Circles: an Essay on Ring Composition. The Terry Lectures. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Engels, F. 1968 [1884]. The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State, in the Light of the Researches of Lewis H. Morgan. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

Fitzgerald, James L. (trans.). 2004. The Mahabharata, Volume 7: Book 11, the Book of the Women; Book 12, the Book of Peace, Part One. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Hara, Minoru. 1974. ‘A Note on the Raksasa Form of Marriage.’ Journal of the American Oriental Society 94 (3): 296–306. https://doi.org/10.2307/600064

Harivamsa. P. L. Vaidya (ed.), The Harivamsa, being the Khila or Supplement to the Mahabharata, for the First Time Critically Edited. Volume I: Introduction, Critical Text and Notes. Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, 1969.

Hawthorne, Sîan Melvill. 2017. ‘Origin Myths and Temporal Orders.’ In Sîan Melvill Hawthorne (ed.), Gender: God: 247–62. Macmillan Interdisciplinary Handbooks. Farmington Hills, MI: Gale, Cengage Learning. https://doi.org/10.13169/reorient.1.1.0043

Hock, Hans Henrich. 2002. ‘The Yajñavalkya Cycle in the Brhad Aranyaka Upanisad.’ Journal of the American Oriental Society 122 (2): 278–86. https://doi.org/10.2307/3087621

Huìfeng, Shì. 2015. ‘Chiastic Structure of the Vessantara Jataka: Textual Criticism and Interpretation through Inverted Parallelism.’ Buddhist Studies Review 32 (1): 143–59. https://doi.org/10.1558/bsrv.v32i1.25056

Jamison, Stephanie W. 2004. ‘Poetry and Purpose in the Rgveda: Structuring Enigmas.’ In Arlo Griffiths and Jan E. M. Houben (eds), The Vedas: Texts, Language and Ritual. Proceedings of the Third International Vedic Workshop, Leiden 2002: 237–49. Groningen: Egbert Forsten. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10783-005-2176-0

—— 2007. The Rig Veda between Two Worlds: Four Lectures at the Collège de France. Publications de l’Institut de Civilisation Indienne. Paris: Éditions de Boccard.

Johnson, W. J. (trans.). 2001. Kalidasa: the Recognition of Sakuntala, a Play in Seven Acts; Sakuntala in the Mahabharata (Mahabharata 1.62–9). Oxford World’s Classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Knight, Chris. 2011. ‘Early Human Kinship was Matrilineal.’ In Allen et al. 2011: 61–82.

Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1969 [1949]. The Elementary Structures of Kinship, revd edn. Trans. James Harle Bell and John Richard von Sturmer. Ed. Rodney Needham. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

Mahabharata. R. N. Dandekar (gen. ed.), The Mahabharata Text as Constituted in its Critical Edition. 5 vols. Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, 1971–76.

Manusmrti. Patrick Olivelle (ed. and trans.), with the editorial assistance of Suman Olivelle, Manu’s Code of Law: a Critical Edition and Translation of the Manava-Dharmasastra. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2006.

Moorjani, Priya et al. 2013. ‘Genetic Evidence for Recent Population Mixture in India.’ American Journal of Human Genetics 93 (3): 422–38.

Morgan, Lewis Henry. 1877. Ancient Society, or Researches in the Lines of Human Progress from Savagery through Barbarism to Civilization. New York: Henry Holt and Co.

O’Brien, Mary. 1981. The Politics of Reproduction. Boston, MA: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Olivelle, Patrick (trans.). 2013. King, Governance, and Law in Ancient India: Kautilya’s Arthasastra. New York: Oxford University Press.

Ramayana. R. T. Vyas (gen. ed.), Valmiki Ramayana: Text as Constituted in its Critical Edition. Vadodara: Oriental Institute, 1992.

Reich, David. 2018. Who We Are and How We Got Here: Ancient DNA and the New Science of the Human Past. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Reich, David et al. 2009. ‘Reconstructing Indian Population History.’ Nature 461 (7263) (24 September): 489–94.

Rubin, Gayle. 1997. ‘The Traffic in Women: Notes on the “Political Economy” of Sex.’ In Linda Nicholson (ed.), The Second Wave: a Reader in Feminist Theory: 27–62. New York: Routledge.

Silva, Marina et al. 2017. ‘A Genetic Chronology for the Indian Subcontinent Points to Heavily Sex-Based Dispersals.’ BMC Evolutionary Biology 17 (88): 1–18.

Smith, John D. (trans.). 2009. The Mahabharata: an Abridged Translation. Penguin Classics. London: Penguin.

Trautmann, Thomas R. 2008 [1987]. Lewis Henry Morgan and the Invention of Kinship, new edn with new introduction and appendices. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

van Buitenen, J. A. B. (trans.). 1978. The Mahabharata, Volume 3: Book 4, the Book of Virata; Book 5, the Book of the Effort. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Published

2021-03-04

How to Cite

Brodbeck, S. (2021). Patrilocality in the Harivamsa’s Visnuparvan. Religions of South Asia, 13(3), 266–288. https://doi.org/10.1558/rosa.19011

Issue

Section

Articles