Solar and Lunar Lines in the Mahabharata

Authors

  • Simon Brodbeck Cardiff University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/rosa.v5i1/2.127

Keywords:

line, lunar, Mahābhārata, moon, putrikā, royal, solar, sun

Abstract

This paper discusses ancestral genealogies descending from the moon and the sun, as found in the Mahabharata, the Harivamsa, and the Ramayana. In particular, the paper explores changes in the way that the ancestry of the Bharata kings was reckoned, and shows how certain narratives may be understood in terms of those changes.

Author Biography

  • Simon Brodbeck, Cardiff University

    Simon Brodbeck is a Researcher and Lecturer in the Department of Religious and Theological Studies at Cardiff University.

References

Baudhayana Dharmasutra. See Olivelle 2000: 191–345.

Bhagavadgita. See Mahabharata (6.23–40).

Brhadaranyaka Upanisad. See Olivelle 1998: 29–165.

Gautama Dharmasutra. See Olivelle 2000: 116–89.

Harivamsa. See Vaidya 1969–71.

Kapisthala Katha Samhita. Raghu Vira (ed.), Kapisthala-Katha-Samhita: A Text of the Black Yajurveda, Critically Edited for the First Time. Delhi: Meharchand Lachhmandas, 1968.

Kathaka Samhita. Leopold von Schroeder (ed.), Kathakam. Die Samhita der Katha-Sakha. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner, 1970–72.

Mahabharata. V. S. Sukthankar, S. K. Belvalkar, P. L. Vaidya, et al. (eds), The Mahabharata for the First Time Critically Edited. Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, 1933–66.

Manusmrti. See Olivelle 2005.

Prasna Upanisad. See Olivelle 1998: 456–71.

Raghuvamsa. C. R. Devadhar (ed. and trans.), Works of Kalidasa, Edited with an Exhaustive Introduction, Critical and Explanatory Notes and English Translation. Volume II: Poetry. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1984.

Ramayana. G. H. Bhatt, U. P. Shah, et al. (eds), The Valmiki-Ramayana Critically Edited for the First Time. Baroda: Oriental Institute, 1958–75.

Rgveda. Barend A. van Nooten and Gary B. Holland (eds), Rig Veda: A Metrically Restored Text with an Introduction and Notes. Cambridge, MA: Department of Sanskrit and Indian Studies, Harvard University, 1994.

Satapatha Brahmana. See Eggeling 1882–1900.

Vasistha Dharmasutra. See Olivelle 2000: 346–463.

Arapura, J. G. 1975. ‘The Upside Down Tree of the Bhagavadgita ch. XV: An Exegesis.’ Numen 22.2: 131–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3269764

Austin, Christopher. In this volume. ‘The Mystery of the Syamantaka Jewel: The Intersection of Genealogy and Biography in the Harivamsa.’

Bedekar, V. M. 1966. ‘Moksadharma.’ In S. K. Belvalkar (ed.), The Mahabharata for the First Time Critically Edited, vol. 16: ccv–ccxlvii. Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.

Bloch, R. Howard. 1983. Etymologies and Genealogies: A Literary Anthropology of the French Middle Ages. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Brinkhaus, Horst. 2005. ‘Duplicates in the Somavamsa Account of the Harivamsa: Early Text-Historical Developments in the Harivamsaparvan.’ In Petteri Koskikallio (ed.), Epics, Khilas, and Puranas: Continuities and Ruptures (DICSEP 3): 363–87. Zagreb: Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts.

— 2009. ‘Suryavamsa—Somavamsa—Harivamsa.’ Conference paper. For abstract see 14th World Sanskrit Conference: Abstracts (Kyoto: Secretariat of the 14th WSC, Kyoto University, 2009): 76.

Brockington, John. 1998. The Sanskrit Epics. Leiden: E. J. Brill.

— 2012. ‘How Japa Changed between the Vedas and the Bhakti Traditions: The Evidence of the Japakopakhyana (MBh 12.189–93).’ Journal of Hindu Studies 5.1: 75–91.

Brockington, Mary. 2005. ‘Rama Dasarathi, the Absent Presence in the Harivamsa.’ In Petteri Koskikallio (ed.), Epics, Khilas, and Puranas: Continuities and Ruptures (DICSEP 3): 297–324. Zagreb: Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts.

Brodbeck, Simon. 2009. The Mahabharata Patriline: Gender, Culture, and the Royal Hereditary. Farnham: Ashgate.

van Buitenen, J. A. B. (trans.). 1973. The Mahabharata, vol. 1. 1. The Book of the Beginning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Doniger, Wendy. 2002. ‘Transformations of Subjectivity and Memory in the Mahabharata and the Ramayana.’ In David Shulman and Guy G. Stroumsa (eds), Self and Self-Transformation in the History of Religions: 57–72. New York: Oxford University Press.

Eggeling, Julius (trans.). 1882–1900. The Satapatha-Brahmana According to the Text of the Madhyandina School. 5 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Ernest, Phillip. 2007. History and the Individual in the Sanskrit Mahabharata. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.

Fitzgerald, James L. (trans.). 2004. The Mahabharata, vol. 7. 11. The Book of the Women; 12. The Book of Peace, Part One. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Glucklich, Ariel. 1988. ‘The Royal Sceptre (Danda) as Legal Punishment and Sacred Symbol.’ History of Religions 28.2: 97–122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/463140

Goldman, Robert P. 1986. ‘A City of the Heart: Epic Mathura and the Indian Imagination.’ Journal of the American Oriental Society 106.3: 471–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/602106

— 1993. ‘Transsexualism, Gender, and Anxiety in Traditional India.’ Journal of the American Oriental Society 113.3: 374–401. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/605387

Gonda, Jan. 1957. ‘Ancient Indian Kingship from the Religious Point of View’ (sections XII–XXV). Numen 4.1: 24–58; 4.2: 127–64.

Hara, Minoru. 1974. ‘A Note on the Raksasa Form of Marriage.’ Journal of the American Oriental Society 94.3: 296–306. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/600064

Heesterman, Jan C. 1985. ‘The Flood Story in Vedic Ritual.’ In Heesterman, The Inner Conflict of Tradition: Essays in Indian Ritual, Kingship, and Society: 59–69. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hein, Norvin. 1986. ‘Epic Sarvabhutahite Ratah: A Byword of Non-Bhargava Editors.’ Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute 67: 17–34.

Hiltebeitel, Alf. In this volume. ‘Between History and Divine Plan: The Mahabharata’s Royal Patriline in Context.’

Hopkins, E. W. 1885. ‘On the Professed Quotations from Manu Found in the Mahabharata.’ Journal of the American Oriental Society 11: 239–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/592193

Ingledew, Francis. 1994. ‘The Book of Troy and the Genealogical Construction of History: The Case of Geoffrey of Monmouth’s Historia regum Britanniae.’ Speculum 69.3: 665–704. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3040847

Jolly, Julius. 1885. Outlines of an History of the Hindu Law of Partition, Inheritance, and Adoption. Calcutta: Thacker, Spink, and Co.

Kale, M. R. (ed. and trans.). 1997. Raghuvamsa of Kalidasa with the Commentary Sañjivani of Mallinatha, Cantos I–V. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

Kane, P. V. 1968–77. History of Dharmasastra: Ancient and Mediæval Religious and Civil Law, 2nd edn. Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.

Karve, Irawati. 1965. Kinship Organization in India, 2nd edn. Bombay: Asia Publishing House.

Koskikallio, Petteri. 1999. ‘Baka Dalbhya: A Complex Character in Vedic Ritual Texts, Epics and Puranas.’ Studia Orientalia 85: 301–87.

Lindquist, Steven E. In this volume. ‘Lines of Descent and Dissent: Genealogy, Narrative, and the Upanisads.’

Macdonell, A. A. 1897. Vedic Mythology. Strassburg: Trübner.

Macdonell, A. A., and A. B. Keith. 1912. Vedic Index of Names and Subjects. 2 vols. London: John Murray.

Malinar, Angelika. 2007. The Bhagavadgita: Doctrines and Contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488290

Olivelle, Patrick (trans.). 1998. The Early Upanisads: Annotated Text and Translation. New York: Oxford University Press.

— (trans.). 2000. Dharmasutras: The Law Codes of Apastamba, Gautama, Baudhayana, and Vasistha. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

— (ed. and trans.), with Suman Olivelle. 2005. Manu’s Code of Law: A Critical Edition and Translation of the Manava-Dharmasastra. New York: Oxford University Press.

Pargiter, F. E. 1922. Ancient Indian Historical Tradition. London: Oxford University Press.

Pollock, Sheldon (trans.). 1986. The Ramayana of Valmiki: An Epic of Ancient India. Volume 2: Ayodhyakanda. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Rocher, Ludo. 1986. The Puranas. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.

Saindon, Marcelle (trans.). 1998. Le Pitrikalpa du Harivamsha: traduction, analyse, interprétation. Quebec: Les Presses de l’Université Laval.

Schmidt, Hanns-Peter. 1987. Some Women’s Rites and Rights in the Veda. Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.

Stein, Burton. 1977. ‘The Segmentary State in South Indian History.’ In Richard G. Fox (ed.), Realm and Region in Traditional India: 3–51. Durham, NC: Duke University, Program in Comparative Studies on Southern Asia.

Sutherland, Sally J. M. 1992. ‘The Bad Seed: Senior Wives and Elder Sons.’ In Sutherland (ed.), Bridging Worlds: Studies on Women in South Asia: 23–52. Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Thapar, Romila. 1978. Exile and the Kingdom: Some Thoughts on the Ramayana. Bangalore: The Mythic Society.

— 1991. ‘Genealogical Patterns as Perceptions of the Past.’ Studies in History (n.s.) 7.1: 1–36.

Thomas, Lynn. 2007. ‘Does the Age Make the King or the King Make the Age? Exploring the Relationship between the King and the Yugas in the Mahabharata.’ Religions of South Asia 1.2: 183–201.

Tsuchida, Ryutaro. 2008. ‘Considerations on the Narrative Structure of the Mahabharata.’ Studies in Indian Philosophy and Buddhism 15.3: 1–26.

Vaidya, P. L. (ed.). 1969–71. The Harivamsa: Being the Khila or Supplement to the Mahabharata, for the First Time Critically Edited. 2 vols. Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.

Witzel, Michael. 2005. ‘The Vedas and the Epics: Some Comparative Notes on Persons, Lineages, Geography, and Grammar.’ In Petteri Koskikallio (ed.), Epics, Khilas, and Puranas: Continuities and Ruptures (DICSEP 3): 21–75. Zagreb: Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts.

Published

2012-05-23

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Brodbeck, S. (2012). Solar and Lunar Lines in the Mahabharata. Religions of South Asia, 5(1-2), 127-152. https://doi.org/10.1558/rosa.v5i1/2.127