Cleanliness is Next to Godliness, But Oaths are for Horses: Antecedents and Consequences of the Institutionalization of Secrecy in Initiatory Wicca

Authors

  • Léon A. van Gulik Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/pome.v14i2.233

Keywords:

Contemporary Paganism, Initiation, Ritual, Secrecy, Wicca

Abstract

Drawing on a theoretical sample from my on-going fieldwork on religious creativity, I offer a psychological perspective on the issue of secrecy in contemporary initiatory Wicca. Secrecy is understood here to exist in those relationships where a supposed inequality of knowledge is actively maintained by managing access to the surplus of that knowledge. First, a descriptive account of the various etic narratives of secrecy is given, successively relating the topic to mythistory, oath keeping, magical practice, and mysteries. Second, moving from the manifest level to the latent level of these narratives, I will then offer an explanation and interpretation of the functions secrecy in terms of the maintenance of ownership, appeal, and association. The latter is explained as ritual hygiene and shown to be the functional opposite of secrecy. In the concluding part two implications of the institutionalization of secrecy are discussed: misrepresentation of knowledge and stalled religious development are shown to be detrimental side-effects of upholding secrecy in contemporary Paganism.

Author Biography

Léon A. van Gulik, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences

Léon van Gulik is a lecturer in psychology at the Department of Applied Psychology, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, The Netherlands. His scholarly interests range from mysticism, ritual, cultural and ecological psychology, creativity, contemporary Paganism, magical thinking, to cultural transmission and spatial aesthetics.

References

Balfer, Maria. “Three Degrees of Openness in London's Pagan Scene.” Pomegranate 11 (2009) 29–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/pome.v11i1.29

Barkun, Michael. “Religion and Secrecy After September 11.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 74 (2006): 275–301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfj058

Bok, Sissela. Secrets: On the Ethics of Concealment and Revelation. New York: Vintage, 1989.

De Zutter, Jan. Eko Eko: Een halve eeuw Wicca. Antwerp: Houtekiet, 2003.

Duncan, Ann Williams.“Religion and Secrecy: A Bibliographic Essay.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 74 (2006), 469–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfj087

Faivre, Antoine. Access to Western Esotericism. Albany: State University of New York, 1994.

Greer, John Michael. Inside a Magical Lodge: Group Ritual in the Western Tradition. St. Paul, Minn.: Llewellyn, 1998.

Hutton, Ronald. Triumph of the Moon: A History of Modern Pagan Witchcraft. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198207443.001.0001

Johnson, Paul. Secrets, Gossip, and Gods: The Transformation of Brazilian Candomblé. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0195150589.001.0001

Kelly, Aidan A. Inventing Witchcraft: A Case Study in the Creation of a New Religion. Loughborough: Thoth, 2007.

Lankester, Joke, and Ko Lankester, Heksen komen van de Maan. Baarn: De Kern, 2005.

Luhrmann, Tanya. “The Magic of Secrecy.” Ethos 17 (1989), 131–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/eth.1989.17.2.02a00010

Marx, Gary T., and Glenn W. Muschert, “Simmel on Secrecy: A Legacy and Inheritance for the Sociology of Information.” In Soziologie als Möglichkeit: 100 Jahre Georg Simmels Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung [The possibility of sociology: 100 years of Georg Simmel’s investigations into the forms of social organization],edited by C. Rol and C. Papilloud, 217–33. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91437-4_13

Simmel, Georg. “The Secret and the Secret Society.” In The Sociology of Georg Simmel, edited by K. H. Wolff, 303–76. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1950.

Smaling, Adri, and Ilja Maso, “Objectiviteit in kwalitatief onderzoek: Een overzicht.” In Objectiviteit in Kwalitatief Onderzoek, edited by Ilja Maso and Adri Smaling, 13–29. Meppel: Boom, 1990.

Toynbee, Jason. “Creativity and Intellectual Property Rights.” In Cultural Expression, Creativity & Innovation, edited by Helmut Anheier and Yudhishthir Raj Isar, 86–98. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446251010.n8

Urban, Hugh B. “Fair Game: Secrecy, Security, and the Church of Scientology in Cold War America.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 74 (2006): 356–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfj084

——. “The Torment of Secrecy: Ethical and Epistemological Problems in the Study of Esoteric Traditions.” History of Religions 37 (1998): 209–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/463503

Van Gulik, Léon A. “On the Pagan Parallax: A Sociocultural Exploration of the Tension between Eclecticism and Traditionalism as Observed among Dutch Wiccans.” Pomegranate 12 (2010): 49–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/pome.v12i1.49

——. “The Scholar Versus the Pagan on Greencraft Tree Walks,” Traditiones 41–1 (2012): 47–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.3986/Traditio2012410105

Downloads

Published

2014-01-13

How to Cite

van Gulik, L. A. (2014). Cleanliness is Next to Godliness, But Oaths are for Horses: Antecedents and Consequences of the Institutionalization of Secrecy in Initiatory Wicca. Pomegranate, 14(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1558/pome.v14i2.233

Section

Articles