The Invention of the “Third World Man”?

Pentecostal Masculinity Studies

Authors

  • Claudia Jahnel University of Hamburg

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/pent.31909

Keywords:

Pentecostalism, gender, masculinity, Latin America, postcolonialism

Abstract

This response to Brendan Thornton’s work on Pentecostal masculinity in the Dominican Republic challenges the analytical frameworks commonly used to study gender in Global Pentecostalism. While affirming Thornton’s aim to broaden horizons in understanding religious gender dynamics, it argues against universalizing Western perspectives on gender and religion that risk “othering” Pentecostals in the Global South. Drawing from postcolonial critique and transcultural studies, the response problematizes established theories like the “Pentecostal gender paradox” and “reformation of machismo” as insufficient for understanding complex gender identities. Instead, it advocates for examining Pentecostal masculinity within broader global discourses and transcultural dynamics. The response concludes by proposing new research questions that consider how local and global religious practices intersect with multiple categories of identity, suggesting that future studies must apply a postcolonial self-critical perspective as well as an interdisciplinary approach to grasp more fully the fluidity of Pentecostal gender identities.

Author Biography

  • Claudia Jahnel, University of Hamburg

    Prof. Dr. Claudia Jahnel is Professor for World Christianity and Religious Studies at the University of Hamburg. Main areas of her research are body, postcolonial theology, transculturality, ecojustice, religious cultures in African contexts.

References

Bergunder, M. 2006. “Pfingstbewegung, Globalisierung und Migration.” In M. Bergunder and J. Haustein (eds.), Migration und Identität: Pfingstlich-charismatische Migrationsgemeinden in Deutschland, 155–70. Frankfurt am Main: Lembeck.

Bergunder, M. 2011. “Was ist Religion? Kulturwissenschaftliche Überlegungen zum Gegenstand der Religionswissenschaft.” Zeitschrift für Religionswissenschaft 19(1–2): 3‒55.

Blaschke, O. 2017. “Religion ist weiblich. Religion ist männlich: Geschlechtsumwandlungen des Religiösen in historischer Perspektive.” In K. Sammet, F. Benthaus-Apel, and C. Gärtner (eds.), Religion und Geschlechterordnungen, 79–97. Wiesbaden: Springer.

Brusco, E. 1995. The Reformation of Machismo: Evangelical Conversion and Gender in Colombia. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Butler, J. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.

Connell, R. W. 2001. “Understanding Men: Gender Sociology and the New International Research on Masculinities.” Social Thought & Research 24(1/2): 13–31.

Farahani, F., and S. Thapar-Björkert. 2019. “Postcolonial Masculinities: Divers, Shifting and in Flux.” In L. Gottzén, U. Mellström, and T. Shefer (eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Masculinity Studies, 92–102. Abingdon: Routledge.

Flora, C. B. 1975. “Pentecostal Women in Colombia: Religious Change and the Status of Working-Class Women.” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 17(4): 411–24.

Jahnel, C. 2022. “‘I am rooted, but I flow’: Pentekostale Körper zwischen Othering, Normalisierung und Widerstand.” In R. Keller and M. Meuser (eds.), Der Körper der Anderen: Soziologische Erkundungen, 23–46. Wiesbaden: Springer.

Lalive d’Epinay, C. 1968. El Refugio de las Masas. Estudios Sociológico del Protestantismo Chileno. Santiago de Chile: Editorial de Pacífico.

Mahmood, Saba. 2012. Politics of Piety. The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Martin, B. 2001. “The Pentecostal Gender Paradox: A Cautionary Tale for the Sociology of Religion.” In R. K. Fenn (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Sociology of Religion. Blackwell Companions to Religion, 2, 52–66. Malden: Blackwell.

McLeod, H. 2012. “The ‘Sportsman’ and the ‘Muscular Christian’: Rival Ideas in Nineteenth Century England.” In J. Art and P. Pasture (eds.), Gender and Christianity in Modern Europe: Beyond the Feminization Thesis, 85–106. Leuven: Leuven University Press.

Mohanty, C. T. 1994. “Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourse.” In P. Williams and L. Chrisman (eds.), Colonial Discourse and Postcolonial Theory: A Reader, 196–220. New York: Routledge.

Pascoe, C. J., and T. Bridges. 2016. Exploring Masculinities: Identity, Inequality, Continuity, and Change. New York: Oxford University Press.

Smith, J. Z. 1990. Drudgery Divine: On the Comparison of Early Christianity and the Religions of Late Antiquity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Thornton, B. J. 2025. “Ethnographic Excursions in the Pentecostal Making and Remaking of Men.” PentecoStudies 23(1): 67-81.

Wedgwood, N., and R. W. Connell. 2010. “Männlichkeitsforschung: Männer und Männlichkeiten im internationalen Forschungskontext.” In R. Becker and B. Kortendiek (eds.), Handbuch Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung: Theorie, Methoden, Empirie, 116–25. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 3rd edn.

Published

2025-05-22

How to Cite

Jahnel, C. (2025). The Invention of the “Third World Man”? Pentecostal Masculinity Studies. PentecoStudies, 23(1), 82-89. https://doi.org/10.1558/pent.31909