Mediation and Learner Reciprocity
Applying Dynamic Assessment to the Oral Proficiency Interview Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.22181Keywords:
dynamic assessment, oral proficiency interview, mediation, learner reciprocity, microgenesis, zone of proximal developmentAbstract
The Oral Proficiency Interview (OPI) is an effective tool for assessing language learners’ speaking ability. While it is commonly employed in institutional contexts, the OPI has been criticized for not granting due attention to the assistance that the tester offers to the learner. Dynamic Assessment (DA), rooted in Vygotsky’s theory of the development of human higher psychological functions, believes the use of different forms of mediation, when tailored to learners’ needs, enables learners to perform beyond their current level, thus providing insights into their emerging abilities. This study explores the use of DA within the OPI framework. Through a microgenetic analysis of the mediation-learner interactions observed in a series of mock OPI sessions conducted in Mandarin Chinese, we identified the mediation and reciprocity typological moves that are significant to learner development. The analysis showed DA’s potential for not only pinpointing areas of difficulty but also identifying the learner’s Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) and supporting their microgenetic progress. The findings indicate that DA would add an important, yet long neglected, dimension to the OPI framework.
References
Ableeva, R. (2018). Understanding learner L2 development through reciprocity. In J. P. Lantolf., M. E. Poehner, and M. Swain (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Development, 266–281. New York: Routledge.
Ableeva, R. and Lantolf, J. P. (2011). Mediated dialogue and the microgenesis of second language listening comprehension. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 18(2): 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2011.555330
Aljaafreh, A. and Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. Modern Language Journal 78(4): 465–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02064.x
ACTFL. (2012a). ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines. https://www.actfl.org/sites/default/files/guidelines/ACTFLProficiencyGuidelines2012.pdf
ACTFL. (2012b). Oral Proficiency Interview Tester Training Manual. NY: ACTFL Inc.
Belz, J. A. and Kinginger, C. (2003). Discourse options and the development of pragmatic competence by classroom learners of German: The case of address forms. Language Learning 53: 591–647. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-9922.2003.00238.x
Brown, A. (2003). Interviewer variation and the co-construction of speaking proficiency. Language Testing 20(1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532203lt242oa
Davin, K. (2013). Integration of dynamic assessment and instructional conversations to promote development and improve assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research 17(3): 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813482934
Davin, K. and Gómez-Pereira, D. (2019). Evaluating instruction through classroom dynamic assessment: A sandwich approach. Language and Sociocultural Theory 6(1): 6–31. https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.38914
Haywood, H. C. and Lidz, C. S. (2007). Dynamic Assessment in Practice: Clinical and Educational Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, M. (2001). The Art of Nonconversation: A Reexamination of the Validity of the Oral Proficiency Interview. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Kozulin, K. (1990). Vygotsky’s Psychology. A Biography of Ideas. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Language Testing International. (n.d.). https://www.languagetesting.com/oral-proficiency-interview-opi#oral-proficiency-interview-opi-q1
Lantolf, J. P. and Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lidz, C. S. (1991). Practitioner’s Guide to Dynamic Assessment. New York: Guilford.
Lidz, C. S. and Gindis, B. (2003). Dynamic assessment of the evolving cognitive functions in children. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev, S. M. Miller, R. Pea, J. S. Brown, and C. Heath (eds.) Vygotsky’s Educational Theory in Cultural Context, 99–116. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ohta, A. S. (2000). Rethinking interaction in SLA: Developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar. In J. P. Lantolf (ed.) Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning, 51–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Poehner, M. E. (2005). Dynamic Assessment of Oral Proficiency Among Advanced L2 Learners of French. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Department of French and Francophone Studies, The Pennsylvania State University.
Poehner, M. E. (2008). Both sides of the conversation: The interplay between mediation and learner reciprocity in dynamic assessment. In J. P. Lantolf and M. E. Poehner (eds.) Sociocultural Theory and the Teaching of Second Languages, 33–56. London: Equinox.
Poehner, M. E. (2018). Proving and provoking L2 development: The object of mediation in dynamic assessment and mediated development. In J. P. Lantolf., M. E. Poehner and M. Swain (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Development, 249–265. New York: Routledge.
Poehner, M. E. and Lantolf, J. P. (2013). Bring the ZPD into the equation: Capturing L2 development during computerized dynamic assessment (C-DA). Language Teaching Research 17(3): 323–342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362168813482935
Ross, S. (1992). Accommodative questions in oral proficiency interviews. Language Testing 9(2): 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229200900205
Sternberg, R. J. and Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic Testing: The Nature and Measurement of Learning Potential. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Swender, E. and Vicars, R. (2012). ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview Tester Training Manual. NY: ACTFL, Inc.
van Compernolle, R. A. (2013). Interactional competence and the dynamic assessment of L2 pragmatic abilities. In S. Ross and G. Kasper (eds.) Assessing Second Language Pragmatics, 327–353. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.
van Compernolle, R. A. (2016). CA-for-SCT: Dialectics and the analysis of cognition on the ground. Language and Sociocultural Theory 3(2): 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.v3i2.33171
van Lier, L. (1989). Reeling, writhing, drawling, stretching, and fainting in coils: Oral proficiency interviews as conversation. TESOL Quarterly 23(3): 489–508.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Mental Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1998). The problem of age. In R. W. Rieber (ed.) The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky: Child Psychology, 187–205. New York: Plenum.
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
