Promoting Conceptual Development of the Second Conditional in the Classroom Zone of Proximal Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.39031Keywords:
sociocultural theory, zone of proximal development, second language teaching, instructional conversation, second conditional in EnglishAbstract
Drawing on Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory (SCT) and the theory of Instructional Conversation (IC), this study explores the development of L2 learners’ understanding of the second conditional during an IC in an online teaching video made by Macmillan Learning Teaching Education. During the IC, the instructor leads students toward a conceptual understanding of the second conditional by providing appropriate mediation sensitive to the class’s zone of proximal development (ZPD). The transcripts of the IC are analyzed with regard to the amount and type(s) of instructional mediation and the development opportunities created in this type of collaborative interaction. The analysis demonstrates the conceptual and linguistic development among the students in terms of the second conditional and shows the value of IC in creating a ZPD to promote L2 conceptual and linguistic development. In addition, this study raises the awareness of the value of online teaching videos in Sociocultural Theory and teacher education.
References
Aljaafreh, A. and Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. Modern Language Journal 78 (4): 465–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02064.x
Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge Of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Davin, K. J. (2013). Integration of dynamic assessment and instructional conversations to promote development and improve assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research 17 (3): 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813482934
Davin, K. J. (2016). Classroom dynamic assessment: A critical examination of constructs and practices. Modern Language Journal 100(4): 813–829. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12352
Davin, K. J. and Donato, R. (2013). Student collaboration and teacher-directed classroom dynamic assessment: A complementary pairing. Foreign Language Annals 46 (1): 522. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12012
Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf and G. Appel (Eds), Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research, 33–56. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263100014303
Echevarria, J. and McDonough, R. (1995). An alternative reading approach: Instructional conversations in a bilingual special education setting. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 10(2): 108–119.
Gebhard, G. (2019). Teaching and Researching ELLs’ Disciplinary Literacy Practices: SFL in Action in the Context of U.S. School Reform. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315108391
Goldenberg, C. (1991). Instructional conversations and their classroom applications. Educational Practice Report 2. Paper EPR02. Santa Cruz, CA: National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning. Retrieved from: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/6q72k3k9
Goldenberg, C. and Patthey-Chavez, G. (1995). Discourse processes in instructional conversations: Interactions between teacher and transition readers. Discourse Processes 19 (1): 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539109544905
Lantolf, J. P. (2000a). Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lantolf, J. P. (2000b). Introducing sociocultural theory. In J.P. Lantolf (Eds), Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning, 126. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lantolf, J. P. and Aljaafreh, A. (1995). Second language learning in the zone of proximal development: A revolutionary experience. International Journal of Educational Research 23: 619–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(96)80441-1
Lantolf, J. P. and Genung, P. (2002). ‘I’d rather switch than fight’: An activity-theoretic study of power, success, and failure in a foreign language. In C. Kramsch (Eds), Language Acquisition and Language Socialization. Ecological Perspectives, 175–196. London: Continuum.
Lantolf, J. P. and Pavlenko, A. (2001). (S)econd (l)anguage (a)ctivity: Understanding learners as people. In M. Breen (Eds), Learner Contributions to Language Learning: New Directions in Research, 141–158. London: Pearson.
Lantolf, J. P. and Poehner, M. E. (2004). Dynamic assessment of L2 development: bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics 1: 4972. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.1.1.49.55872
Lantolf, J. P. and Poehner, M. E. (Eds) (2008a). Sociocultural Theory and the Teaching of Second Languages. London: Equinox.
Lantolf, J. P. and Poehner, M. E. (2010). Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for second language development. Language Teaching Research 15: 11–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810383328
Lantolf, J. P. and Poehner, M. E. (2011). Dynamic Assessment in the Foreign Language Classroom: A Teacher’s Guide, 2nd edition. University Park, PA: CALPER.
Lantolf, J. P. and Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lightbown, P. M. and Spada, N. (2013). How Languages are Learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lidz, C. S. and Gindis, B. (2003). Dynamic assessment of the evolving cognitive functions in children with typical and atypical development. In A. Kozulin, V. Ageyev, S. Miller, and B. Gindis (Eds), Vygotsky’s Theory of Education in Cultural Context, 99–116. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Poehner, M. E. (2007). Beyond the test: L2 dynamic assessment and the transcendence of mediated learning. Modern Language Journal 91 (3): 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00583.x
Poehner, M. E. (2009). Group dynamic assessment: Mediation for the L2 classroom. TESOL Quarterly 43(3): 471–491. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00245.x
Poehner, M. E. (2011). Validity and interaction in the ZPD: interpreting learner development through L2 Dynamic Assessment. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 21(2): 244–263.
Poehner, M. E. and Lantolf, J. P. (2005). Dynamic assessment in the language Classroom. Language Teaching Research 9 (3): 233–265. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168805lr166oa
Poehner, M. E. and Lantolf, J. P. (2013). Bringing the ZPD into the equation: Capturing L2 development during Computerized Dynamic Assessment (C-DA). Language Teaching Research 17(3): 323–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813482935
Poehner, M. E., Zhang, J., and Lu, X. (2015). Computerized dynamic assessment (C-DA): Diagnosing L2 development according to learner responsiveness to mediation. Language Testing 32(3): 337–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214560390
Ratner, C. (2002). Cultural Psychology: Theory and Method. New York: Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0677-5
Resnick, L. (1984). Comprehending and learning: Implications for a cognitive theory of instruction. In H. Mandl, N. Stein and T. Trabasso (Eds), Learning and Comprehension of Text, 431–433. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Saunders, W. M. and Goldenberg, C. (1999). Effects of instructional conversations and literature logs on limited- and fluent-English-proficient students’ story comprehension and thematic understanding. The Elementary School Journal 99 (4): 277–301. https://doi.org/10.1086/461927
Tharp, R. G. and Gallimore, R. (1991). The instructional conversation: Teaching and learning in social activity. Research Reports: 2. Paper rr02. Santa Cruz, CA: National Center for Research and Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning. Retrieved from: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5th0939d
Thorne, S. L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning & Technology 7 (2): 38–67.
Thorne, S. L. (2005). Epistemology, politics, and ethics in sociocultural theory. Modern Language Journal 89 (5): 393–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00313.x
Van Compernolle, R. A. and Williams, L. (2012). Promoting sociolinguistic competence in the classroom zone of proximal development. Language Teaching Research 16 (1): 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811423340
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Mental Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch (Eds), The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology, 144–188. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky, Volume 1, Problems of General Psychology, Including the Volume Thinking and Speech. R. W. Rieber and A. S. Carton (Eds). New York: Plenum. https://doi.org/10.1086/356870
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
