Teaching Domain-Based Figurative Expressions
Designing and Implementing CL-informed SCOBAs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.19040Abstract
Cognitive Linguistics (CL) and Sociocultural Theory (SCT) complement each other in L2 pedagogy (Lantolf, 2006, 2011; Masuda & Arnett, 2015). In this study, we unite teaching materials informed by cross-linguistic CL studies and SCT pedagogy – namely, concept-based language instruction (C-BLI) – to teach two Chinese-speaking English-as-a-second-language learners figurative expressions in the MORALITY domain and the concept of conceptual metaphor using several SCOBAs (Schemas for Complete Orienting Basis of Action). We provide microgenetic analysis of two case studies, focusing on each participant’s process of internalization and their interaction with SCOBAs during the pre-test, two instructional sessions, and post-test. Both students demonstrated their abilities to draw on the concept of conceptual metaphor to understand figurative speech in English from domains not limited to morality. In the end, we discuss implications on the design and implementation of SCOBAs.
References
Arievitch, I. M., and Haenen, J. P. P. (2005). Connecting sociocultural theory and educational practice: Gal’perin’s approach. Educational Psychologist 40(3): 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4003_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4003_2
Buescher, K. (2015). Developing second language narrative literacy using concept-based instruction and a division-of-labor pedagogy [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The Pennsylvania State University.
Buescher, K., and Strauss, S. (2015). A cognitive linguistic analysis of French prepositions à, dans, and en and a sociocultural theoretical approach to teaching them. In K. Masuda, C. Arnett, and A. Labarca (Eds), Cognitive Linguistics and Sociocultural Theory, 155–182. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614514442-009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614514442-009
Gal’perin, P. Y. (1992). Stage-by-stage formation as a method of psychological investigation. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology 30(4): 60–80. https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405300460 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405300460
García, P. N. (2018). Concept-based instruction: Investigating the role of conscious conceptual manipulation in L2 development. In J. P. Lantolf, M. E. Poehner & M. Swain (Eds), The Routledge Handbook of Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Development, 181–196). New York: Routledge.
Gánem-Gutiérrez, G. A., and Harun, H. (2011). Verbalisation as a mediational tool for understanding tense-aspect marking in English: An application of concept-based instruction. Language Awareness 20(2): 99–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2010.551125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2010.551125
HYDCD. (n.d.). Hànyu dà cídian [Grand dictionary of Chinese language]. Retrieved from https://ww.hydcd.com
Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001
Johnson, M. (2017). Embodied Mind, Meaning, and Reason: How Our Bodies Give Rise to Understanding. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226500393.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226500393.001.0001
Kepler, G. (2019). A Microgenetic Analysis of the Development of Thematic Coherence Between the Topic Sentence and Supporting Ideas in the English Academic Paragraph: A Case Study of a Saudi Female Writer [Doctoral dissertation]. Indiana University.
Kim, J. and Lantolf, J. P. (2018). Developing conceptual understanding of sarcasm in L2 English through explicit instruction. Language Teaching Research 22(2): 208–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816675521
Kövecses, Z. (2017). Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics 28(2): 321–34. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0052
Lai, W. (2012). Concept-based foreign language pedagogy: Teaching the Chinese temporal system [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The Pennsylvania State University.
Lakoff, G. (1986). A figure of thought. Metaphor and Symbol 1(3): 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0103_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0103_4
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
Lakoff, G. J. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh (Vol. 4). New York, NY: Basic Books.
Lantolf, J. P. (1999). Second culture acquisition: Cognitive considerations. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Culture in Second Language Teaching and Learning, 28–46. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lantolf, J. P. (2006). Sociocultural theory and L2: State of the art. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28(1): 67–109. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060037
Lantolf, J. P. (2011). Integrating sociocultural theory and cognitive linguistics in the second language classroom. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning (Vol. 2), 303–318. New York: Routledge.
Lantolf, J. P. and Poehner, M. E. (2014). Sociocultural Theory and the Pedagogical Imperative in L2 Education: Vygotskian Praxis and the Research/Practice Divide. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203813850 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203813850
Lantolf, J. P. and Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lantolf, J. P. and Tsai, M. H. (2018). L2 developmental education and systemic theoretical instruction. In A. E. Tyler, L. Ortega, N. Uno, and H. I. Park (Eds), Usage-inspired L2 Instruction: Researched Pedagogy (Vol. 49), 29–53. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.49.02lan DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.49.02lan
Lantolf, J. P. and Zhang, X. (2017). Sociocultural theory and concept-based instruction. In S. Loewen and M. Sato (Eds), The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 146–165. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676968-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676968-9
Lee, H. (2012). Concept-based approach to second language teaching and learning: Cognitive Linguistics-inspired instruction of English phrasal verbs [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The Pennsylvania State University.
Kepler, G. (2019). A Microgenetic Analysis of the Development of Thematic Coherence Between the Topic Sentence and Supporting Ideas in the English Academic Paragraph: A Case Study of a Saudi Female Writer [Doctoral dissertation]. Indiana University.
Kim, J. and Lantolf, J. P. (2018). Developing conceptual understanding of sarcasm in L2 English through explicit instruction. Language Teaching Research 22(2): 208–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816675521 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816675521
Masuda, K. and Arnett, C. (2015). Cognitive linguistics, sociocultural theory and language teaching: Introduction. In K. Masuda, C. Arnett, and A. Labarca (Eds), Cognitive Linguistics and Sociocultural Theory, 1–22. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614514442-003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614514442-003
Masuda, K. and Labarca, A. (2015). Schematic diagram use and languaging quality in learning Japanese polysemous particles ni and de. In K. Masuda, C. Arnett, and A. Labarca (Eds), Cognitive Linguistics and Sociocultural Theory, 203–232. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614514442-011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614514442-011
Navajas, A. and Ferrer, A. (2012). Using SCOBAs to help learners develop self-regulation. Frontiers of Language and Teaching 3: 239–247.
Negueruela, E. (2003). A sociocultural approach to teaching and researching second languages: Systemic-theoretical instruction and second language development [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
Ohta, A. S. (2017). Sociocultural theory and second/foreign language education. In N. van Deusen-Scholl and S. May (Eds), Second and Foreign Language Education, 57–68. New York: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02246-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02246-8_6
Ohta, A. and Masuda, K. (2018). Future directions for informed language pedagogy from cognitive linguistics and sociocultural theory. In K. Masuda (Ed.), Cognitive Linguistics and Japanese Pedagogy: A Usage-Based Approach to Language Learning and Instruction, 303–322. Boston, MA: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110456554-011 Oxford University. (n.d.). Dirty. In Oxford Online Dictionary. Retrieved from https:// en.oxforddictionaries.com DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110456554-011
Poehner, M. E. and Infante, P. (2019). Mediated development and the internalization of psychological tools in second language (L2) education. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 22: 100–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100322 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100322
Serrano-Lopez, M. and Poehner, M. E. (2008). Materializing linguistic concepts through 3-D clay modeling: A tool-and-result approach to mediating L2 Spanish development. In J. P. Lantolf and M. E. Poehner (Eds), Sociocultural Theory and the Teaching of Second Languages, 321–346. London: Equinox.
Swain, M., Lapkin, S., Knouzi, I., Suzuki, W., and Brooks, L. (2009). Languaging: University students learn the grammatical concept of voice in French. The Modern Language Journal 93(1): 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00825.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00825.x
Talyzina, N. (1981). The Psychology of Learning. Moscow: Progress Press.
Van Compernolle, R. A. (2011). Developing second language sociopragmatic knowledge through concept-based instruction: A microgenetic case study. Journal of Pragmatics 43(13): 3267–3283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.06.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.06.009
Van Compernolle, R. A. (2018). Learning the sociopragmatics of an artificial language: Comparing rule-based and concept-based instruction. Language and Sociocultural Theory 5(1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.33770 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.33770
White, B. J. (2012). A conceptual approach to the instruction of phrasal verbs. The Modern Language Journal 96(3): 419–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01365.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01365.x
Yu, N. (2015). Metaphorical character of moral cognition: A comparative and decompositional analysis. Metaphor and Symbol 30(3): 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2015.1049500 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2015.1049500
Yu, N. (2016). Spatial metaphors for morality: A perspective from Chinese. Metaphor and Symbol 31(2): 108–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2016.1150763 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2016.1150763
Yu, N., Wang, T. and He, Y. (2016). Spatial subsystem of moral metaphors: A cognitive semantic study. Metaphor and Symbol 31(4): 195–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2016.1223470 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2016.1223470
Zhang, J. and Zhang, X. (2018). Concept-based instruction of Chinese as a second language. In J. P. Lantolf, M. E. Poehner, and M. Swain (Eds), The Routledge Handbook of Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Development, 197–210. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315624747-13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315624747-13
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
