‘Good Packaging Can be Misleading’
A Peircean Contribution to Intersubjectivity and Vygotskyan Sign Mediation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.18833Keywords:
Peirce, Vygotsky, intersubjectivity, semiosis, iconicity, instances of signification, intersemiosisAbstract
This article explores the applicability of a Peircean approach to the intersubjectivity of adult-child shared reading. Peirce’s semiosis serves as an analytical device for ways in which intersubjectivity transcends social interaction. By scrutinising instances of signification, i.e., the production and interpretation of signs constitutive of meaning making in the reading of a dual-language picturebook, the analysis reveals that the word-image complementarity renders an unfolding of intersubjective nuances in collaborative learning and intervention. This provides impetus for furthering Vygotsky’s sign mediation to embrace the notion of ‘intersemiosis’ as indexed to the interdependence of signifying codes in communication and representation, thus theorising how the signification of such codes elicits, invites, and empowers social interaction. Resonant with edusemiotics, increasingly a reference point in the philosophical foundation of learning and development, this article offers pedagogical implications for teachers.
References
Arizpe, E. and Styles, M. (2003). Children Reading Pictures: Interpreting Visual Texts. London: RoutledgeFalmer. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203005156
Astington, J. W. and Baird, J. A. (2005). Why Language Matters for Theory of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195159912.001.0001
Atoofi, S. (2017). Knowledge as a sign: An edusemiotic theory of learning heritage language. In I. Semetsky (Ed), Edusemiotics: A Handbook, 221–234. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1495-6_16
Atoofi, S. (2019). Reconsidering repetition in language education: an edusemiotic approach. Social Semiotics 29: 670–683. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2018.1514777
Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Trans. V. W. McGee. Ed. C. Emerson and M. Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Barthes, R. (1977). Image Music Text (Trans. S. Heath, Selec.). London: Fontana Press.
Belhiah, H. (2012). Gesture as a resource for intersubjectivity in second-language learning situations. Classroom Discourse 4: 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2012.671273
Beraldo, R. M. F., Ligorio, M. B., and Barbato, S. (2018). Intersubjectivity in primary and secondary education: a review study. Research Papers in Education 33: 278–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2017.1302497
Bergman, M. (2009). Peirce’s Philosophy of Communication: The Rhetorical Underpinnings of the theory of signs. London: Continuum.
Bruner, J. (1986). Thought and emotion: Can humpty dumpty be put together again? In D. J. Bearison and H. Zimiles (Eds), Thought and Emotion, 11–20. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bruner, J. (1996). The Culture of Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Chiong, C. and DeLoache, J. S. (2012). Learning the ABCs: What kinds of picture books facilitate young children’s learning? Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 13: 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798411430091
Clark, A. (2006). Language, embodiment, and the cognitive niche. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10: 370–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.06.012
Corriveau, K. H. and Harris, P. L. (2015). Children’s developing realization that some stories are true: Links to the understanding of beliefs and signs. Cognitive Development 34: 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.12.005
Cotton, P. (2000). Picture Books Sans Frontieres. London: Trentham Books.
Danesi, M. (2001). Foreword: Thomas A. Sebeok and Semiotics. In T. A. Sebeok, Signs: An Introduction to Semiotics, xi–xvi. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Daniels, H., Cole, M., and Wertsch, J. V. (2007). The Cambridge Companion to Vygotsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521831040
Derrida, J. (2016). Of Grammatology (Fortieth Anniversary Edition). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Derry, J. (2013). Vygotsky Philosophy and Education. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118368732
Eco, U. (1976). A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15849-2
Eco, U. (1999). Kant and Platypus: Essays on Language and Cognition. London: Secker & Warburg.
Garte, R. (2016). A sociocultural, activity-based account of preschooler intersubjectivity. Culture and Psychology 22: 254–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X15621483
González, N, Moll, L. C., and Amanti, C. (2005). Funds of Knowledge: Theorizing Practices in Households, Communities, and Classrooms. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410613462
Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1489–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X
Goodwin, C. (2004). A competent speaker who can’t speak: the social life of Aphasia. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14: 151–17. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2004.14.2.151
Goodwin, C. (2007). Interactive Footing. In E. Holt and R. Clift (Eds), Reporting Talk, 16–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Arnold.
Haan, M. (2001). Intersubjectivity in models of learning and teaching: reflections from a study of teaching and learning in a Mexican Mazahua community. In S. Chaiklin (Ed), The Theory and Practice of Cultural-historical Psychology, 174–199. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
John-Steiner, V. P. (2000). Creative Collaboration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Hodder Education.
Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Lankshear, C. and Knobel, M. (2011). New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Lantolf, J. P. and Poehner, M. E. (2014). Sociocultural Theory and the Pedagogical Imperative in L2 Education: Vygotskian Praxis and the Research/Practice Divide. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203813850
Leiman, M. (1999). The concept of sign in the work of Vygotsky, Winnicott, and Bakhtin: Further integration of object relations theory and activity theory. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, and R.-L. Punamäki (Eds), Perspectives on Activity Theory, 419–434. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812774.027
Lewis, D. (2001). Picturing Text: The Contemporary Children’s Picturebook. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Liu, Y. and O’Halloran, K. L. (2009). Intersemiotic texture: Analysing cohesive devices between language and images. Social Semiotics 19: 367–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330903361059
Ma, J. (2004). Reading the word and the world: A child in the interplay of her contexts in the reading of dual-language storybooks with her mother. Ph.D. thesis. University of Bristol. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?did=1&uin=uk.bl.ethos.404093
Ma, J. (2008). Reading the word and the world: how mind and culture are mediated through the use of dual-language storybooks. Education 3–13 36: 237–251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03004270802217686
Ma, J. (2013). Exploring the complementary effect of post-structuralism on sociocultural theory of mind and activity. Social Semiotics, 23: 444–456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2012.741398
Ma, J. (2014). The synergy of Peirce and Vygotsky as an analytical approach to the multimodality of semiotic mediation. Mind, Culture, and Activity 21: 374–389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2014.913294
Ma, J. (2017). Semiotising the student perception of learning outcomes in British higher education. Social Semiotics 27: 227–242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2016.1189234
Mercer, N. (2000). Words and Minds: How We Use Language to Think Together. London: Routledge.
Misak, C. (2004). Charles Sanders Peirce (1839–1914). In C. Misak (Ed), The Cambridge Companion to Peirce, 1–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521570069.001
Moran, D. (2000). Introduction to Phenomenology. London: Routledge.
Nikolajeva, M. and Scott, C. (2001). How Picturebooks Work. New York: Garland.
Norros, L. (2018). Understanding acting in complex environments: Building a synergy of cultural-Historical activity theory, Peirce, and ecofunctionalism. Mind, Culture, and Activity 25: 68–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2017.1350714
O’Halloran, K. L. (2005). Mathematical Discourse: Language, Symbolism and Visual Images. London: Continuum.
Paglen, T. (2018). Machine visions. Naucalpan, Mexico: Servicios Tepemex.
Painter, C., Martin, J. R., and Unsworth, L. (2013). Reading Visual Narratives: Image Analysis of Children’s Picture Books. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
Palincser, A. S. (2005). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. In H. Daniels (Ed), An Introduction to Vygotsky, 285–314. London: Routledge.
Peirce, C. S. (1932). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. 2 (C. Hartsborne and P. Weiss, Eds). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Peirce, C. S. (1991). Peirce on Signs (J. Hoopes, Ed). Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press.
Peirce, C. S. (1992). The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, Vol. 1 (1867–1893) (N. Houser and C. Kloesel, Eds). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Peirce, C. S. (1998). Pragmatism. In Peirce Edition Project (Ed), The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, Vol. 2 (1893–1913), 398–433. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Quay, J. (2017). Chapter 6 Education and reasoning: Advancing a Peircean edusemiotic. In I. Semetsky (Ed), Edusemiotics – A Handbook, 79–92. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1495-6_6
Robin, R. S. (1967). Annotated Catalogue of the Papers of Charles S. Peirce. Worcester: University of Massachusetts Press.
Rogoff, B. (1998). Cognition as a collaborative practice. In W. Damon, D. Kuhn, and R. S. Siegler, Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol. 2: Cognition, Perception and Language, 679–744. New York: Wiley.
Rogoff, B. (2003). The Cultural Nature of Human Development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Royce, T. D. (2007). Intersemiotic complementarity: A framework for multimodal discourse analysis. In T. D. Royce and W. L. Bowcher (Eds), New Directions in the Analysis of Multimodal Discourse, 63–109. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Sapir, E. (1949). Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co. https://doi.org/10.1037/13026-000
Saussure, F. de (1959/1966), Course in General Linguistics. Trans. by W. Baskin. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Sebeok, T. A. (2001). Global Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Semetsky, I. and Stables, A. (2015). Understanding edusemiotics: exploring educational futures. In A. Stables and I. Semetsky (Eds), Edusemiotics: Semiotic Philosophy as Educational Foundation, 155–164. London: Routledge.
Semetsky, I. (2017). The embodied mind: Education as the transformation of habits. In I. Semetsky (Ed), Edusemiotics: A Handbook, 137–150. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1495-6_10
Simcock, G. and DeLoache, J. (2006). Get the picture? The effects of iconicity on toddlers’ reenactment from picture books. Developmental Psychology 42: 1352–1357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.6.1352
Sipe, L. R. (2014). Young children’s visual meaning-making in response to picturebooks. In J. Flood, S. B. Heath, and D. Lapp (Eds), Handbook of Research on Teaching Literacy through the Communicative and Visual Arts, Vol. 2, 381–391. London: Routledge.
Soslau, E. G. (2015). Exploring intersubjectivity between student teachers and field instructors in student teaching conferences. Cogent Education 2: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2015.1045219
Stables, A. (2010). Semiosis and the collapse of mind-body dualism: Implications for education. In I. Semetsky (Ed), Semiotics Education Experience, 21–36. Rotterdam/Boston/Taipei: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789460912252_003
Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., and Lebaron, C. (2011). Embodied interaction in the material world: an introduction.” In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, and C. Lebaron (Eds), Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World, 1–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strouse, G. A., Nyhout, A., and Ganea, P. A. (2018). The role of book features in young children’s transfer of information from picture books to real-world contexts. Frontiers in Psychology 9: 1–14 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00050
Tharp, R. G. and Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing Minds to Life: Teaching, Learning, and Schooling in Social Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173698
Unsworth, L. and Wheeler, J. (2002). Re-valuing the role of images in reviewing picture books. Literacy 36: 68–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9345.00189
Vadeboncoeur, J. A. and Collie, R. J. (2013). Locating social and emotional learning in schooled environments: A Vygotskian perspective on learning as unified. Mind, Culture, and Activity 20: 201–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2012.755205
Valsiner, J. and Rosa, A. (2007). The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Valsiner, J. and van der Veer, R. (2000). The Social Mind: Construction of the Idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vološinov, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1966). Development of higher mental functions. In A.N. Leontyev, A. R. Luria, and A. Smirnov (Eds), Psychological Research in the USSR, 11–46. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. London: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and Language. London: The MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. Wertsch (Ed), The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology, 144–188. New York: Sharpe.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1997a). The problem of consciousness. In R. W. Rieber and J. Wollock (Eds), The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky, Volume 3: Problems of the Theory and History of Psychology, 129–138. New York, NY: Plenum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5893-4_11
Vygotsky, L. S. (1997b). Research method. In R. W. Rieber (Ed), The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky, Volume 4: The History of the Development of Higher Mental Functions, 27–64. New York, NY: Plenum.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1997c). Genesis of higher mental functions. In R. W. Rieber (Ed), The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky, Volume 4: The History of the Development of Higher Mental Functions, 1–239. New York: Plenum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5939-9_1
Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic Inquiry: Towards a Sociocultural Practice and Theory of Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605895
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195117530.001.0001
Wertsch, J. V. (2007). Mediation. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, and J. V. Wertsch (Eds), The Cambridge Companion to Vygotsky, 178–192. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521831040.008
Zlatev, J., Racine, T. P., Sinha, C., and Itkonen, E. (2008). The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.12
