Testing the Topic Hypothesis

A Concept-based Teaching Study

Authors

  • Xian Zhang University of North Texas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.37716

Keywords:

Ecolinguistics, Ecosophy, Discourse Analysis

Abstract

The Topic Hypothesis (Pienemann, Di Biase, and Kawaguchi, 2005) predicts that L2 Chinese learners must go through three stages in the processing of L2 syntax (Stage 1: SVO; Stage 2: ADJ+SVO; Stage 3: OSV). The current study investigated whether properly organized instruction (Concept-based Instruction/Systemic Theoretical Instruction) could allow learners to process and produce two stages of grammar structures at the same time. Two beginning Chinese learners at Stage 1 received concept-based instruction that taught both OSV and ADJ+SVO structures in the same instructional session. Learners’ spontaneous speech indicate that both learners were capable to process and produce the two newly taught grammar structures after one instructional session. Post-test and delayed post-test show that both grammar structures were processable by the two learners. This study highlights the importance of instruction to shape cognitive development, which echoes Vygotsky’s (1986) notion that good instruction shall lead development.

Author Biography

  • Xian Zhang, University of North Texas

    Xian Zhang is an assistant professor in applied linguistics at the department of linguistics, University of North Texas. His research interests primarily lie on second language acquisition, sociocultural theory, cognition, corpus linguistics, and language assessment.

References

Bresnan, J. (2001). Lexical-functional Syntax. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Ellis, R., Loewen, S., and Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 339–368. https:/doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060141.

Erlam, R. (2006). Elicited imitation as a measure of L2 implicit knowledge: An empirical validation study. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 464–491. https:/doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml001.

Flynn, S. (1987). A Parameter-Setting Model of L2 Acquisition. Experimental Studies in Anaphora. Dortrecht: Reidel.

Gal’perin, P. I. (1970). An experimental study in the formation of mental actions. In E. Stones (Eds), Reading in Educational Psychology: Learning and Teaching, 142–154. New York: Barnes and Noble, Inc.

Gal’perin, P. I. (1992). Stage-by-stage formation as a method of psychological investigation. Journal of Russian and Eastern European Psychology 30: 60–80.

Gal’perin, P. I. (1989). Organization of mental activity and the effectiveness of learning. Soviet Psychology 27: 45–65.

Gao, X. (2009). Noun Phrase Morphemes and Topic Development in L2 Mandarin Chinese: A Processability Perspective. Saarbrucken: Lambert Academic Publishing.

Gattegno, C. (1976). The Common Sense of Teaching Foreign Languages. New York Educational Solutions.

Kaplan, R. and Bresnan, J. (1982). Lexical-functional grammar: A formal system for grammatical representation. In J. Bresnan (Eds), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, 173–281. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Lantolf, J. P. (2005). Sociocultural and second language learning research: An exegesis. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning, 335–354. New York: Routledge.

Lantolf, J. P. (2011). Integrating sociocultural theory and cognitive linguistics in the second language classroom. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning (Vol. II), 303–318. New York: Routledge.

Pienemann, M. (1989). Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics 1: 52–79. https:/doi.org/10.1093/applin/10.1.52

Pienemann, M. (1998). Language Processing and Second Language Development: Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Pienemann, M. (2005). An introduction to Processability Theory. In M. Pienemann (Eds), Crosslinguistic Aspects of Processability Theory, 1–60. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.

Pienemann, M. and Kessler, J-U. (2011). Studying Processability Theory: An Introductory Textbook (Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Pienemann, M., Di Biase, B., and Kawaguchi, S. (2005). Extending Processability Theory. Cross-linguistic Aspects of Processability Theory 10 (107), 199–251.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Wang, X. (2011). Grammatical development among Chinese L2 learners: From a processability account. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Newcastle University, Newcastle.

Zhang, X. (2014). The teachability hypothesis and concept-based instruction: Topicalization in Chinese as a second language. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.

Zhang, X. and Lantolf, J. P. (2015). Natural or artificial: Is the route of L2 development teachable? Language Learning 65: 152–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12094

Zhang, Y. (2007). Testing the Topic Hypothesis: The L2 acquisition of Chinese syntax. In F. Mansouri (Eds), Second Language Acquisition Research: Theory-construction and Testing, 145–171. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Published

2021-02-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Zhang, X. (2021). Testing the Topic Hypothesis: A Concept-based Teaching Study. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 7(1), 87-122. https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.37716