Gods of Participation
Participatory Sense-making and an Enactivist Reframing of the Religion and Morality Problem
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/jcsr.27225Keywords:
morality, religion, evolution, 4E cognition, enactivism, autopoiesis, participatory sense-makingAbstract
This paper is a theoretical discussion of how the relation between religion and morality – one of the main research areas in the cognitive and evolutionary sciences of religion (CESR) – may be rephrased in terms of 4E cognition. This aim is realized through redefining morality and religion in terms of participatory sense-making – a model of social cognition situated within the 4E framework. This paper explains the basic tenets of the 4E (embodied, embedded, extended, and enactive) approach to cognition. It clarifies how the notion of mental representations – pivotal for any theorizing within CESR – can be fitted within this model by adopting a radical enactive cognition view. It then proceeds to define participatory sense-making and demonstrate how morality as a system for regulating cooperative behavior fits this concept. Finally, it discusses the role of representations of gods’ moral concerns in reinforcing morality. It argues that focusing on the meaning-making potential of social interactions can elucidate where these representations come from and how they unfold.
References
Alexander, R. (1987). The biology of moral systems: Foundations of human behavior. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Andersen, M. (2019). Predictive coding in agency detection. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 9(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2017.1387170
Barrett, L. (2018). The evolution of cognition: A 4E perspective. In A. Newen, L. de Bruin, & S. Gallagher (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of 4E cognition (pp. 719–734). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brooks, R. A. (1991). Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47, 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(91)90053-M
Ciolkosz, M. (2016). Investigating the structure of religious concepts: A few remarks from the perspective of enactivism and cognitive linguistics. Open Theology, 2, 92–105. https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2016-0007
———. (2017). Representation, enaction, religion: Different models of cognition and their implications for the cognitive study of religions. Studia Religiologica, 50(2), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.4467/20844077SR.17.008.7339
———. (2022). Thinking in asana: Movement and philosophy in Viniyoga, Iyengar Yoga, and Ashtanga Yoga. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
Curry, O. S., Chesters, M. J., & Van Lissa, C. J. (2019). Mapping morality with a compass: Testing the theory of “morality-as cooperation” with a new questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 78, 106–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2018.10.008
De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. A. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6, 485-507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-007-9076-9
DesCamp, M. T., & Sweetser, E. E. (2005). Metaphors for God: Why and how do our choices matter for humans? The application of contemporary cognitive linguistics research to the debate on God and metaphor. Pastoral Psychology, 53, 207–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-004-0554-5
Di Paolo, E. A. (2005). Autopoiesis, adaptivity, teleology, agency. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4, 429–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-005-9002-y
———. (2009). Extended life. Topoi, 28, 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-008-9042-3
Di Paolo, E. A., Buhrmann, T., & Barandiaran, X. (2017). Sensorimotor life: An enactive proposal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Di Paolo, E. A., Cuffari, E. C., & De Jaegher, H. (2018). Linguistic bodies: The continuity between life and language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Di Paolo, E. A. Rohde, M., & De Jaegher, H. (2010). Horizons for the enactive mind: Values, social interaction, and play. In J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, & E. A. Di Paolo (Eds.), Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive science (pp. 33–88). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Gallese, V. (2008). Mirror neurons and the social nature of language: The neural exploitation hypothesis. Social Neuroscience, 3(3–4), 317–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470910701563608
Geertz, A. W. (2010). Brain, body, and culture: A biocultural theory of religion. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 22, 304–321. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006810X531094
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141
Fromm, E. (1950). Psychoanalysis and religion. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316, 998–1002. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137651
Hamilton, W. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 37, 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4
Hohwy, J. (2013). The predictive mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. (2018). The predictive processing hypothesis. In A. Newen, L. de Bruin, & S. Gallagher (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of 4E cognition (pp. 129–146). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hutto, D. D., & Myin, E. (2013). Radicalizing enactivism: Basic minds without content. Cambridge: MIT Press.
———. (2017). Evolving enactivism: Basic minds meet content. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kirchhoff, M. D. (2018). The body in action: Predictive processing and the embodiment thesis. In A. Newen, L. de Bruin, & S. Gallagher (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of 4E cognition (pp. 243–260). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kundtová Klocová, E., & Geertz, A. W. (2018). Ritual and embodied cognition. In R. Uro, J. J. Day, R. E. DeMaris, & R. Roitto (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of early Christian ritual (pp. 74–94). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
———. (1988). Cognitive semantics. In U. Eco (Ed.), Meaning and mental representations (pp. 119–154). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
———. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. (2009). Investigations in cognitive grammar. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Laycock, J. P. (2020). Speak of the devil: How the Satanic Temple is changing the way we talk about religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Levy, G. (2022). Beyond heaven and earth: A cognitive theory of religion. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Lyon, P. (2006). The biogenic approach to cognition. Cognitive Processing, 7, 11–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-005-0016-8
Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Boston: Reidel.
———. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston: Shambala Publications.
Moreno, A., Umerez, J., & Ibañez, J. (1997). Cognition and life: The autonomy of cognition. Brain & Cognition, 34, 107–29. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1997.0909
Newen, A., de Bruin, L., & Gallagher, S. (2018). 4E cognition: Historical roots, key concepts, and central issues. In A. Newen, L. de Bruin, & S. Gallagher (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of 4E cognition (pp. 3–18). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Norenzayan, A. (2013). Big gods: How religion transformed cooperation and conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Purzycki, B. G., & Sosis, R. (2022). Religion evolving: Cultural, cognitive, and ecological dynamics. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
Purzycki, B. G., & Willard, A. K. (2016). MCI theory: A critical discussion. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 6(3), 207–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/21535-99X.2015.1024915
Purzycki, B. G., Willard, A. K., Kundtová Klocová, E., Apicella, C., Atkinson, Q., Bolyanatz, A., Cohen, E., Handley, C., Henrich, J., Lang, M., Lesorogol, C., Mathew, S., McNamara, R. A., Moya, C., Norenzayan, A., Placek, C., Soler, M., Vardy, T., Weigel, J., … & Ross, C. T. (2022). The moralization bias of gods’ minds: A cross-cultural test. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 12(1–2), 38–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2021.2006291
Ravenscroft, I. (2005). Philosophy of mind: A beginner’s guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Richerson, P., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Schjødt, U. (2018). Predictive coding in the study of religion: A believer’s testimony. In A. K. Petersen, G. I. Sælid, L. H. Martin, J. S. Jensen, & J. Sørensen (Eds.), Evolution, cognition, and the history of religion: A new synthesis. Festschrift in honour of Armin W. Geertz (pp. 364–379). Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004385375_025
Schjødt, U., & Andersen, M. (2017). How does religious experience work in predictive minds? Religion, Brain & Behavior, 7(4), 320–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153-599X.2016.1249913
Schloss, J. P., & Murray, M. J. (2011). Evolutionary accounts of belief in supernatural punishment: A critical review. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 1(1), 46–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2011.558707
Schüler, S. (2012). Religion, Kognition, Evolution: Eine religionswissenschaftliche Auseinandersetzung mit der Cognitive Science of Religion. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Sheets-Jonstone, M. (2010). Thinking in movement: Further analyses and validations. In J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, & E. A. Di Paolo (Eds.), Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive science (pp. 165–182). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Sørensen, J. (2023). Why cultures persist: Toward a cultural immunology. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
Szymanek, P., & Ciolkosz, M. (2023). Raising the Buddha’s hand: Illusory ownership in the experience of identification with a supernatural agent in deity yoga. Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion, 9(1), 4–25. https://doi.org/10.1558/jcsr.22811
Teehan, J. (2010). In the name of God: The evolutionary origins of religious ethics and violence. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
———. (2017). Ethics, secular and religious: An evolved-cognitive analysis. In P. Zuckerman, & J. R. Shook (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of secularism (pp. 1–24). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. (2018). The cognitive science of religion: Implications for morality. Unisinos Journal of Philosophy, 19(3), 272–281. https://doi.org/10.4013/fsu.2018.193.09
———. (forthcoming). Toward an embodied CSR: Enaction, emergence, and evolution. Religion, Brain & Behavior.
Teehan, J., & Shults, F. L. (2019). Religion, empathy, and cooperation: A case study in the promises and challenges of modeling and simulation. In S. Y. Diallo, W. J. Wildman, F. L. Shults, & A. Tolk (Eds.), Human simulation: Perspectives, insights, and applications (pp. 157–178). New York: Springer.
Trivers, R. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1086/406755
Van Duijn, M., Keijzer, F., & Franken, D. (2006). Principles of minimal cognition: Casting cognition as sensorimotor coordination. Adaptive Behavior, 14(2), 157-170. https://doi.org/10.1177/105971230601400207
van Elk, M., & Bekkering, H. (2018). The embodiment of concepts: Theoretical perspectives and the role of predictive processing. In A. Newen, L. de Bruin, & S. Gallagher (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of 4E cognition (pp. 641–659). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Varela, F. J. (1996). Neurophenomenology: A methodological remedy for the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3(4), 330–349.
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Visuri, I. (2020). Sensory supernatural experiences in autism. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 10(2), 151–165, https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2018.1548374
Whitehouse, H., François, P., Savage, P. E., Hoyer, D., Feeney, K. C., Cioni, E., Purcell, R., Larson, J., Baines, J., ter Haar, B., Covey, A., & Turchin, P. (2023). Testing the Big Gods hypothesis with global historical data: A review and “retake.” Religion, Brain & Behavior, 13(2), 124–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2022.2074085
Published
Issue
Section
License
Equinox Publishing Ltd.
