How to Bridge Cognitive and Cultural Models of Religious Evolution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/jcsr.23695Keywords:
cultural evolution, cognitive science of religion, supernatural beliefs, cross-cultural researchAbstract
The scientific study of religion has roots in at least two traditions: a cognitive tradition which typically uses experimental studies to examine the proximal psychological processes underlying religious belief and ritual, and an anthropological tradition which uses historical and ethnographic data to examine how religious systems culturally evolve in social groups. In Religion Evolving, Purzycki and Sosis bridge both traditions and encourage a more integrated evolutionary science of religion. In this essay, I present three suggestions for how to make this science as ambitious and collaborative as possible. These suggestions are: (1) to move beyond straw
man debates that pit byproduct models against functional models of religious evolution and acknowledge that these models are compatible from a dual inheritance perspective, (2) to evaluate functionalist claims with caution, recognizing how and when religion is adaptive vs. maladaptive for secular society, and (3) to avoid reductive definitions of religion and embrace religious pluralism. With these lessons in mind, we can usher in a bolder evolutionary science of religion that draws from both cognitive and cultural traditions.
References
Abrams, S., Jackson, J. C., & Gray, K. (2021). The new trinity of religious moral character: The cooperator, the crusader, and the complicit. Current Opinion in Psychology, 40, 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.09.001
Atran, S. (1998). Folk biology and the anthropology of science: Cognitive universals and cultural particulars. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21(4), 547–569. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X98001277
Atran, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2004). Religion’s evolutionary landscape: Counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(6), 713–730. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X04000172
Barrett, J. L. (2004). Why would anyone believe in God? Lanham: AltaMira Press.
Beebe, J. R., & Duffy, L. (2020). The memorability of supernatural concepts: Effects of minimal counterintuitiveness, moral valence, and existential anxiety on recall. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 30(4), 322–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2020.1750134
Botero, C. A., Gardner, B., Kirby, K. R., Bulbulia, J., Gavin, M. C., & Gray, R. D. (2014). The ecology of religious beliefs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(47), 16784–16789. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1408701111
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1988). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Boyer, P. (2007). Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought. New York: Basic Books.
Caluori, N., Jackson, J. C., Gray, K., & Gelfand, M. (2020). Conflict changes how people view God. Psychological Science, 31(3), 280–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619895286
Cantor, N., & Mischel, W. (1979). Prototypes in person perception. Advances in experimental social psychology, 12, 3–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60258-0
Dawkins, R. (2006). The god delusion. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Dennett, D. C. (2006). Breaking the spell: Religion as a natural phenomenon. New York: Penguin.
Ember, C. R., Skoggard, I., Ringen, E. J., & Farrer, M. (2018). Our better nature: Does resource stress predict beyond-household sharing? Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(4), 380–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.03.001
Gelfand, M. J., Harrington, J. R., & Jackson, J. C. (2017). The strength of social norms across human groups. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(5), 800–809. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708631
Guthrie, S. E. (1995). Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion. New York: Oxford University Press.
Harris, S. (2006). Science must destroy religion. The Huffington Post. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/science-must-destroy-reli_b_13153
Herskovits, M. (1938). Dahomey: An ancient west African kingdom. 2 vols. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Hitchens, C. (2008). God is not great: How religion poisons everything. New York: McClelland & Stewart.
Jackson, J. C., Caluori, N., Abrams, S., Beckman, E., Gelfand, M., & Gray, K. (2021). Tight cultures and vengeful gods: How culture shapes religious belief. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 150(10), 2057–2077. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001033
Jackson, J. C., Caluori, N. E., Gray, K., & Gelfand, M. (2021). The new science of religious change. American Psychologist, 76(6), 838–850. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000818
Jackson, J. C., Dillion, D., Bastian, B., Watts, J., Buckner, W., DiMaggio, N., & Gray, K. (2023). Supernatural explanations across 114 societies are more common for natural than social phenomena. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(5), 707–717. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01558-0
Jackson, J. C., Gelfand, M., & Ember, C. R. (2020). A global analysis of cultural tightness in non-industrial societies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 287(1930), 20201036. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.1036
Jackson, J. C., & Gray, K. (2019). When a good god makes bad people: Testing a theory of religion and immorality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(6), 1203–1230. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000206
Jackson, J. C., Hester, N., & Gray, K. (2018). The faces of God in America: Revealing religious diversity across people and politics. PLoS ONE, 13(6), e0198745. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198745
Jackson, J. C., Van Egmond, M., Choi, V. K., Ember, C. R., Halberstadt, J., Balanovic, J., Basker, I. N., Boehnke, K., Buki, N., & Fischer, R. (2019). Ecological and cultural factors underlying the global distribution of prejudice. PLoS ONE, 14(9), e0221953. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221953
Laurin, K., Shariff, A. F., Henrich, J., & Kay, A. C. (2012). Outsourcing punishment to God: Beliefs in divine control reduce earthly punishment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279(1741), 3272–3281. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.0615
Norenzayan, A., & Shariff, A. F. (2008). The origin and evolution of religious prosociality. Science, 322(5898), 58–62. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1158757
Norenzayan, A., Shariff, A. F., Gervais, W. M., Willard, A. K., McNamara, R. A., Slingerland, E., & Henrich, J. (2016). The cultural evolution of prosocial religions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, E1. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X14001356
Purzycki, B. G. (2013). The minds of gods: A comparative study of supernatural agency. Cognition, 129(1), 163–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.06.010
Purzycki, B. G., & Sosis. R. (2022). Religion evolving: The dynamics of culture, cognition, and ecology. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
Purzycki, B. G., & Willard, A. K. (2016). MCI theory: A critical discussion. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 6(3), 207–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/21535-99X.2015.1024915
Roberts, S. O., Weisman, K., Lane, J. D., Williams, A., Camp, N. P., Wang, M., Robison, M., Sanchez, K., & Griffiths, C. (2020). God as a White man: A psychological barrier to conceptualizing Black people and women as leadership worthy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(6), 1290–1315. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000233
Roos, P., Gelfand, M., Nau, D., & Lun, J. (2015). Societal threat and cultural variation in the strength of social norms: An evolutionary basis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129, 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.01.003
Rowatt, W. C., LaBouff, J., Johnson, M., Froese, P., & Tsang, J.-A. (2009). Associations among religiousness, social attitudes, and prejudice in a national random sample of American adults. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 1(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014989
Skoggard, I., Ember, C. R., Pitek, E., Jackson, J. C., & Carolus, C. (2020). Resource stress predicts changes in religious belief and increases in sharing behavior. Human Nature, 31(3), 249–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-020-09371-8
Swan, T., & Halberstadt, J. (2019). The Mickey Mouse problem: Distinguishing religious and fictional counterintuitive agents. PLoS ONE, 14(8), e0220886. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220886
———. (2020). The fitness relevance of counterintuitive agents. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 20(3–4), 188–217. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12340081
Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift Für Tierpsychologie, 20(4), 410–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1963.tb01161.x
Watts, J., Sheehan, O., Atkinson, Q. D., Bulbulia, J., & Gray, R. D. (2016). Ritual human sacrifice promoted and sustained the evolution of stratified societies. Nature, 532(7598), 228–231. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17159
White, C. (2021). An introduction to the cognitive science of religion: Connecting evolution, brain, cognition and culture. Abingdon: Routledge.
Whitehouse, H., & McCauley, R. (2005). Introduction: New frontiers in the cognitive science of religion. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 5(1–2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568537054068705
Published
Issue
Section
License
Equinox Publishing Ltd.
