Religion Devolving?
When Shared Ritual Engagement with Supernatural Agents Becomes Maladaptive
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/jcsr.23578Keywords:
religion, adaptation, maladaptation, naturalism, secularism, religion as by-productAbstract
This article highlights several of the valuable contributions in Religion Evolving by Benjamin Purzycki and Richard Sosis (2022) and offers some material and methodological reflections that are intended to complement their efforts. Their book offers a clear and useful operationalization of religion, emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary approaches to the phenomena in question, and makes great strides in overcoming the polarizing debate between proponents of the “by-product” and “adaptationist” camps in the cognitive and evolutionary science of religion. The bulk of the current article argues for the importance of building on their efforts by also attending to the conditions under which – and the mechanisms by which – religion can become “maladaptive” in contemporary contexts.
References
Alcorta, C. S., & Sosis, R. (2006). Why ritual works: A rejection of the by-product hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29(6), 613–614. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X06009344
Cliquet, R. L., & Avramov, D. (2018). Evolution science and ethics in the third millennium: Challenges and choices for humankind. Cham: Springer.
Diallo, S., Wildman, W. J., Shults, F. L., & Tolk, A. (Eds.). (2019). Human simulation: Perspectives, insights, and applications. Cham: Springer.
Dutton, E., & Van der Linden, D. (2017). Why is intelligence negatively associated with religiousness? Evolutionary Psychological Science, 3, 392–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-017-0101-0
Ellis, L., Hoskin, A. W., Dutton, E., & Nyborg, H. (2017). The future of secularism: A biologically informed theory supplemented with cross-cultural evidence. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 3, 224–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-017-0090-z
Etengoff, C., & Lefevor, T. G. (2021). Sexual prejudice, sexism, and religion. Current Opinion in Psychology, 40, 45–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.08.024
Galen, L., Gore, R., & Shults, F. L. (2021). Modeling the effects of religious belief and affiliation on prosociality. Secularism and Nonreligion, 10(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.5334/snr.128
Gore, R., Lemos, C., Shults, F. L., & Wildman, W. J. (2018). Forecasting changes in religiosity and existential security with an agent-based model. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 21, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.3596
Hasan, R. (2017). Religion and development in the global south. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
McCaffree, K., & Shults, F. L. (2021). Distributive effervescence: Emotional energy and social cohesion in secularizing societies. Theory and Society, 51, 233–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-021-09470-0
Norenzayan, A. (2013). Big gods: How religion transformed cooperation and conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Norenzayan, A., & Gervais, W. M. (2013). The origins of religious disbelief. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(1), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.11.006
Paul, G. (2009). The chronic dependence of popular religiosity upon dysfunctional psychosociological conditions. Evolutionary Psychology, 7(3), 398–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490900700305
Purzycki, B. G., Henrich, J., Apicella, C., Atkinson, Q. D., Baimel, A., Cohen, E., McNamara, R. A., Willard, A. K., Xygalatas, D., & Norenzayan, A. (2018). The evolution of religion and morality: A synthesis of ethnographic and experimental evidence from eight societies. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 8(2), 101–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2016.1267027
Purzycki, B. G., & McNamara, R. A. (2016). An ecological theory of gods’ minds. In H. De Cruz & R. Nichols (Eds.). Advances in religion, cognitive science, and experimental philosophy (pp. 143–167). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Purzycki, B. G., & Sosis, R. (2022). Religion evolving: Cultural, cognitive, and ecological dynamics. Sheffield, UK: Equinox.
Purzycki, B. G., & Willard, A. K. (2015). MCI theory: A critical discussion. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 6(3), 207–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2015.1024915
Shults, F. L. (2014). Theology after the birth of God: Atheist conceptions in cognition and culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
———. (2015). How to survive the Anthropocene: Adaptive atheism and the evolution of Homo deiparensis. Religions, 6(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel6020724
———. (2018). Practicing safe sects: Religious reproduction in scientific and philosophical perspective. Leiden: Brill Academic.
———. (2019). Computer modeling in philosophy of religion. Open Philosophy, 2, 108–125. https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2019-0011
———. (2020). Toxic theisms? New strategies for prebunking religious belief-behavior complexes. Journal of Cognitive Historiography, 5(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1558/jch.38074
———. (2021). Simulating secularities: Challenges and opportunities in the computational science of (non)religion. Secularism and Nonreligion, 10(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.5334/snr.154
Shults, F. L., Gore, R., Lemos, C., & Wildman, W. J. (2018). Why do the godless prosper? Modeling the cognitive and coalitional mechanisms that promote atheism. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 10(3), 218–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000198
Shults, F. L., Gore, R., Wildman, W. J., Lynch, C., Lane, J. E., & Toft, M. (2018). A generative model of the mutual escalation of anxiety between religious groups. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 21(4), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.3840
Shults, F. L., & Wildman, W. J. (2018). Simulating religious entanglement and social investment in the Neolithic. In I. Hodder (Ed.). Religion, history and place in the origin of settled life (pp. 33–63). Denver: University of Colorado Press.
Shults, F. L., Wildman, W. J., Lane, J. E., Lynch, C., & Diallo, S. (2018). Multiple axialities: A computational model of the Axial Age. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 18(4), 537–564. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12340043
Shults, F. L., Wildman, W. J., Toft, M. D., & Danielson, A. (2021). Artificial societies in the Anthropocene: Challenges and opportunities for modeling climate, conflict, and cooperation. Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference (pp. 1–12). Phoenix, AZ: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC52266.2021
Sosis, R. (2009). The adaptationist-byproduct debate on the evolution of religion: Five misunderstandings of the adaptationist program. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 9(3), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1163/156770909X12518536414411
Sosis, R., & Bulbulia, J. (2011). The behavioral ecology of religion: The benefits and costs of one evolutionary approach. Religion, 41(3), 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2011.604514
Wildman, W. J., Shults, F. L., Diallo, S. Y., Gore, R., & Lane, J. E. (2020). Post-supernaturalist cultures: There and back again. Secularism & Nonreligion, 9, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.5334/snr.121
Zuckerman, M., Silberman, J., & Hall, J. A. (2013). The relation between intelligence and religiosity: A meta-analysis and some proposed explanations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(4), 325–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868313497266
Published
Issue
Section
License
Equinox Publishing Ltd.
