The Devil’s in the Details
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/jcsr.23505Keywords:
MCI theory, complex adaptive systems, byproduct theoryAbstract
Benjamin Purzycki and Richard Sosis’ Religion Evolving (2022) offers an impressive synoptic overview of current theory and findings in the scientific study of religion, and a potentially important new model. This theory merits further development but requires some attention to issues of definition.
References
Atran, S. (2002). In gods we trust: The evolutionary landscape of religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barrett, J. L. (2008). Coding and quantifying counterintuitiveness in religious concepts: Theoretical and methodological reflections. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 20, 308–338. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006808X371806
Boyer, P. (1990). Tradition as truth and communication: A cognitive description of traditional discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. (1994). The naturalness of religious ideas: A cognitive theory of religion. Berkeley: University of California Press.
———. (2001). Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought. New York: Basic Books.
D’Andrade, R. G. (1995). The development of cognitive anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Farmer, J. D. (1990). A Rosetta stone for connectionism. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 42(1–3), 153–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(90)90072-W
Holland, J. H. (1975). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: An introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., & Thagard, P. R. (1986). Induction: Processes of inference, learning, and discovery. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Lawson, E. T., & McCauley, R. N. (1990). Rethinking religion: Connecting cognition and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lewin, R. (1992). Complexity: Life at the edge of chaos. New York: Macmillan.
Malley, B. (1995). Explaining order in religious systems. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 7(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006895X00180
McCauley, R. N. (2011). Why religion is natural and science is not. New York: Oxford University Press.
McCauley, R. N., & Lawson, E. T. (2002). Bringing ritual to mind: Psychological foundations of cultural forms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McCulloch, W. S., & Pitts, W. (1943). A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 5, 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02478259
Needham, R. (1972). Belief, language, and experience. Oxford: Blackwell.
Rappaport, R. A. (1968). Pigs for the ancestors: Ritual in the ecology of a New Guinea people. New Haven: Yale University Press.
———. (1999). Ritual and religion in the making of humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sperber, D. (1975). Rethinking symbolism (A. L. Morton, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. (1985). On anthropological knowledge: Three essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Strauss, C., & Quinn, N. (1997). A cognitive theory of cultural meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
von Neumann, J. (1951). Various techniques used in connection with random digits. Paper presented at the Monte Carlo method: Proceedings of a symposium held June 29, 30, and July 1, 1949, in Los Angeles, California, under the sponsorship of the Rand Corporation, and the National Bureau of Standards, with the cooperation of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Los Angeles, California. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Print Office.
Whitehouse, H. (1995). Inside the cult: Religious innovation and transmission in Papua New Guinea. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. (2004). The theory of modes of religiosity. In Modes of religiosity: A cognitive theory of religious transmission (pp. 63–85). Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Equinox Publishing Ltd.
