Ritual Animals also Require Pedagogy, Communication, and Social Reasoning

Authors

  • Radu Umbreș National School of Political and Administrative Studies SNSPA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/jcsr.23448

Keywords:

Pedagogy, Communication, Reasoning, Cultural Transmission, Coordination, Epistemic Vigilance, Epistemic Deference, Signalling, Costly Signalling, Coalitions

Abstract

Harvey Whitehouse offers a complex and stimulating theory of rituals that bind people together and propagate via affiliative imitation. The Ritual Animal argues that fundamental problems of group cooperation can be solved by causally opaque and goal-demoted behaviors which produce arbitrary cultural conventions, honest signals of membership, and collective fused identities. This amply evidenced and compelling account explains a broad variety of prominent examples, yet other key causal mechanisms emerge from the ethnographic literature and analytical reflection on affiliation and groups. Taking a glance at some widespread and unusual rituals, this paper highlights the importance of cultural transmission via pedagogy with or without copying, costly signaling and coordination without coalitional groups, and meta-representations of impenetrable ritual efficacy. Future research can explain how bonding rituals become central features of social interaction without relying upon a quite debatable adaptive function of ritual behavior for cooperation – or anything else.

References

Altinok, N., Király, I., & Gergely, G. (2022). The propensity to learn shared cultural knowledge from social group members: Selective imitation in 18-month-olds. Journal of Cognition and Development, 23(2), 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2021.1966013

Astuti, R. (1995). People of the sea: Identity and descent among the Vezo of Madagascar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Avvakum, A. (1979). The life written by himself: With the study of V. V. Vinogradov. Translations, Annotations, and a Historical Introduction by Kenneth N. Boström. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Bloch, M. (1991). Prey into hunter: The politics of religious experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Boyer, P. (2020). Why divination? Evolved psychology and strategic interaction in the production of truth. Current Anthropology, 61(1), 100–123. https://doi.org/10.1086/706879

Boyer, P., & Liénard, P. (2020). Ingredients of “rituals” and their cognitive underpinnings. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 375(1805), 20190439. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0439

Burge, T. (1979). Individualism and the mental. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 4, 73–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.1979.tb00374.x

Burridge, K. (1960). Mambu: A Melanesian millennium. London: Methuen & Co.

Chagnon, N. A. (1988). Life histories, blood revenge, and warfare in a tribal population. Science, 239(4843), 985–992. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.239.4843.985

Cherniavsky, M. (1966). The Old Believers and the new religion. Slavic Review, 25(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.2307/2492649

Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2009). Natural pedagogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(4), 148–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.005

Curry, O. S. (2016). Morality as cooperation: A problem-centered approach. In T. Shackelford, & R. Hansen (Eds.). The evolution of morality (pp. 27–51). Cham: Springer. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-319-19671-8_2

Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1933). Zande blood-brotherhood. Africa, 6(4), 369–401. https://doi.org/10.2307/1155555

———. (1940). The Nuer: A description of the modes of livelihood and political institutions of Nilotic people. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

———. (1951). Kinship and marriage among the Nuer. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Fortes, M. (1966). Religious premises and logical technique in divinatory ritual. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 251(772), 409–422. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2416753

Harris, P. L., & Corriveau, K. H. (2011). Young children’s selective trust in informants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1567), 1179–1187. https://doi.org/10.1098%2Frstb.2010.0321

Hayden, B. (2009). Funerals as feasts: Why are they so important? Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 19(1), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095977430900002X

Herdt, G. H. (1981). Rituals of manhood: Male initiation in Papua New Guinea. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Lancy, D. F. (2016). Teaching: Natural or cultural? In D. Geary, & D. Berch (Eds.). Evolutionary perspectives on child development and education (pp. 33–65). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29986-0_2

Lattas, A. (1989). Trickery and sacrifice: Tambarans and the appropriation of female reproductive powers in male initiation ceremonies in west New Britain. Man, 24(3), 451–469. https://doi.org/10.2307/2802701

Lawrence, P. (1964). Road belong cargo: A study of the cargo movement in southern Madang district, New Guinea. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Leach, E. R. (1954). Political systems of Highland Burma: A study of Kachin social structure. London: G. Bell and Sons.

———. (1966). Ritualization in man in relation to conceptual and social development. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 251(772), 403–408. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2416752

Lewis, J. (2016). Play, music, and taboo in the reproduction of an egalitarian society. In H. Terashima, & B. Hewlett (Eds.). Social learning and innovation in contemporary hunter-gatherers (pp. 147–158). Tokyo: Springer.

Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the western Pacific. London: Routledge.

Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2009). Intuitive and reflective inferences. In J. Evans, & K. Frankish (Eds.). In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 149–170). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1862670

———. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(2), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x10000968

Morin, O. (2015). How traditions live and die. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Noyes, A., & Dunham, Y. (2020). Groups as institutions: The use of constitutive rules to attribute group membership. Cognition, 196, 104143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104143

Rappaport, R. A. (1999). Ritual and religion in the making of humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sahlins, M. D. (1963). Poor man, rich man, big-man, chief: Political types in Melanesia and Polynesia. Comparative studies in society and history, 5(3), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500001729

Salali, G. D., Chaudhary, N., Bouer, J., Thompson, J., Vinicius, L., & Migliano, A. B. (2019). Development of social learning and play in BaYaka hunter-gatherers of Congo. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47515-8

Schmidt, M. F., & Tomasello, M. (2012). Young children enforce social norms. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(4), 232–236. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0963721412448659

Sosis, R., & Alcorta, C. (2003). Signaling, solidarity, and the sacred: The evolution of religious behavior. Evolutionary Anthropology, 12(6), 264–274. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.10120

Sperber, D. (1982). Apparently irrational beliefs. In M. Hollis, & S. Lukes (Eds.). Rationality and relativism (pp. 149–180). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

———. (1997). Intuitive and reflective beliefs. Mind & Language, 12(1), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.1997.tb00062.x

Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, C., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G., & Wilson, D. (2010). Epistemic vigilance. Mind & Language, 25(4), 359–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01394.x

Strathern, A. (1971). The rope of moka: Big-men and ceremonial exchange in Mount Hagen, New Guinea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Terashima, H., & Hewlett, B. S. (2016). Social learning and innovation in contemporary hunter-gatherers. Berlin: Springer.

Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2010). Groups in mind: The coalitional roots of war and morality. In H. Høgh-Olesen (Ed.). Human morality and sociality: Evolutionary and comparative perspectives (pp. 191–234). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Turner, V. W. (1969). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.

Umbres, R. (2022). Buckets of steam and left-handed hammers: The fool’s errand as signal of epistemic and coalitional dominance. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 22(1–2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12340122

———. (2022). Living with distrust: Morality and cooperation in a Romanian village. New York: Oxford University Press.

Whitehouse, H. (1995). Inside the cult: Religious innovation and transmission in Papua New Guinea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———. (2004). Modes of religiosity: A cognitive theory of religious transmission. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.

———. (2021). The ritual animal: Imitation and cohesion in the evolution of social complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Williams, F. E. (1976). “The Vailala madness,” and other essays. London: C. Hurst.

Worsley, P. (1968). The trumpet shall sound: A study of “cargo” cults in Melanesia. New York: Schocken Books.

Zenkovsky, S. A. (1957). The Russian church schism: Its background and repercussions. The Russian Review, 16(4), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/125748

Published

2022-11-16

Issue

Section

Book Panel

How to Cite

Umbreș, R. (2022). Ritual Animals also Require Pedagogy, Communication, and Social Reasoning. Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion, 8(2), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1558/jcsr.23448

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>