Representing Group Rituals
Their Embeddedness and the Vulnerability of Fanatic Members to Extreme Behaviors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/jcsr.22038Keywords:
Rituals, Religous Fundamentalism, Social Representations, embodimentAbstract
In Harvey Whitehouse’s book (2021), he argues that humans are ritual animals, and that rituals can be the glue shaping group bonds.
Whitehouse argues further that rituals are embedded in our routines and have become habitual. In this article, I add the idea of embodiment and social representations as a supplement to Whitehouse’s studies of rituals, group identities, and their interactions in society. In my view, these ideas may answer the following questions: 1) why people still practice group rituals, even though they are not attached to the group; 2) why people are ready to die defending their group even though they are not active in the community and rarely practice group rituals; and 3) why people are so fanatical about their religion that they are ready to die defending it, and how to alleviate such fanaticism.
References
Elcheroth, G., Doise, W., & Reicher, S. (2011). On the knowledge of politics and the politics of knowledge: How a social representations approach helps us rethink the subject of political psychology. Political Psychology, 32(5), 729–758. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00834.x
Hood, R. W., Hill, P. C., & Williamson, P. (2005). The psychology of religious fundamentalism. New York, NY: The Guildford Press.
Johnson, M. K., Rowatt, W. C., & LaBouff, J. P. (2012). Religiosity and prejudice revisited: In-group favoritism, out-group derogation, or both? Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 4(2), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025107
Kavanagh, C., Kapitány, R., Wibisono, S., Yustisia, W., Putra, I. E., Rufaedah, A., & Whitehouse, H. (2021). Exploring the role of identity fusion and group identification in predicting parochialism amongst Indonesian Islamic groups. Manuscript submitted for publication. https://psyarxiv.com/e8ytr
Koopmans, R. (2015). Religious fundamentalism and hostility against out-groups: A comparison of Muslims and Christians in Western Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41, 33–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2014.935307
Malik, I., Putera, V. S., & Putra, I. E. (2018). Traditional leaders in the reconciliation of Muslim-Christian conflicts in Moluccas. In A. H. Campbell (Ed.). Global leadership initiatives for conflict resolution and peacebuilding (pp. 235–248). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Mashuri, A., & Zaduqisti, E. (2019). Explaining Muslims’ aggressive tendencies towards the West: The role of negative stereotypes, anger, perceived conflict and Islamic fundamentalism. Psychology and Developing Societies, 31(1), 56–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971333618819151
Meier, B. P., Schnall, S., Schwarz, N., & Bargh, J. A. (2012). Embodiment in social psychology. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4, 705–716. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01212.x
Putra, I. E. (2014). The role of ingroup and outgroup meta-prejudice in predicting prejudice and identity undermining. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 20, 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000068
Putra, I. E., Holtz, P., & Rufaedah, A. (2018). Who is to blame, the victims or the perpetrators? A study to understand a series of violence targeting accused heretic group Ahmadiyya. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 10, 166–173. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/rel0000186
Putra, I. E., & Sukabdi, Z. (2020). Is there peace within Islamic fundamentalists? When Islamic fundamentalism moderates the effect of meta-belief of friendship on positive perceptions and trust toward outgroup. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 41, 214–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.07.008
Putra, I. E., & Wagner, W. (2017). Prejudice in interreligious context: The role of meta-prejudice and majority-minority status. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 226–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2305
Talukdar, J. (2014). Rituals and embodiment: Class differences in religious fasting practices of Bengali Hindu women. Sociological Focus, 47, 141–162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2014.916592
Wagner, W. (1998). Social representations and beyond: Brute facts, symbolic coping and domesticated worlds. Culture & Psychology, 4(3), 297–329. http://dx.doi.org/1177/1354067x9800400302
Wagner, W., Duveen, G., Farr, R., Jovchelovitch, S., Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., Marková, I., & Rose, D. (1999). Theory and method of social representations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 95–125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-839x.00028
Wagner, W., Sen, R., Permanadeli, R., & Howarth, C. S. (2012). The veil and Muslim women’s identity: Cultural pressures and resistance to stereotyping. Culture & Psychology, 18(4), 521–541. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354067x12456713
Williamson, W. P., Hood, R. W., Ahmad, A., Sadiq, M., & Hill, P. C. (2010). The Intratextual Fundamentalism Scale: Cross-cultural application, validity evidence, and relationship with religious orientation and the Big 5 factor markers. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 13(7–8), 721–747. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13674670802643047
Yustisia, W., Putra, I. E., Kavanagh, C., Whitehouse, H., & Rufaedah, A. (2020). The role of religious fundamentalism and tightness-looseness in promoting collective narcissism and extreme group behavior. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 12(2), 231–240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/rel0000269
Published
Issue
Section
License
Equinox Publishing Ltd.
