Phenomena, Mechanisms, and Levels of Analysis in the CSR

Authors

  • Ann Taves University of California at Santa Barbara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/jcsr.20877

Keywords:

Cognitive Science, Religion, Levels of Analysis

Abstract

This outstanding textbook provides an expansive overview of the sub-field of the Cognitive Science of Religion (CSR). White’s summary of the field’s core assumptions affords the opportunity – as does the book as a whole – to reflect on theory and method in the CSR and its implications for the evolutionary study of religion and/or culture more generally. Although White effectively summarizes the core assumptions using the “fractionation” terminology widely adopted in the field, I think the process of deconstructing and reconstructing needs to be more firmly grounded in philosophical work on explanation and multi-level research on meaning-making and appraisal processes. Without that, researchers run the risk of conflating levels of analysis and muddying what can and cannot be claimed at each level. Greater clarity in this regard suggests that “fractionating” religion is a positive step toward a more comprehensive, scientific understanding of the possibilities and limits of cultural diversity rather than a theory of religion.

Author Biography

Ann Taves, University of California at Santa Barbara

Ann Taves is Professor of Religious Studies at the University of California at Santa Barbara. Her most recent book is Revelatory Events: Three Case Studies of the Emergence of New Spiritual Paths (Princeton, 2016).

References

Atran, S. (1999). Folk biology. In R. Wilson, & F. Keil (Eds.). The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences (pp. 316–317). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Boyer, P., & Bergstrom, B. (2008). Evolutionary perspectives on religion. Annual Review of Anthropology, 37(1), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085201

McKay, R., & Whitehouse, H. (2015). Religion and morality. Psychological Bulletin, 141(2), 447–473. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038455 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038455

Slone, D. J., & McCorkle, W. W. (2019). The cognitive science of religion: A methodological introduction to key empirical studies. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350033726

Taves, A. (2019). From religious studies to worldview studies. Religion, 50(1), 137–147 https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2019.1681124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2019.1681124

Taves, A., & Asprem, E. (2020). The building blocks approach: An overview. In G. Larsson, J. Svensson, & A. Nordin (Eds.). Building blocks of religion: Critical applications and future prospects (pp. 5–25). Sheffield: Equinox Publishing Ltd.

Taves, A., Asprem, E., & Ihm, E. (2018). Psychology, meaning making, and the study of worldviews: Beyond religion and non-religion. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 10(3), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000201

Published

2022-04-20

How to Cite

Taves, A. . (2022). Phenomena, Mechanisms, and Levels of Analysis in the CSR. Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion, 7(2), 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1558/jcsr.20877

Issue

Section

Book Panel