Religion as a Testing Ground for Cognitive Science
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/jcsr.20641Keywords:
Intuitive dualism, God concepts, Afterlife beliefs, Folk theories, Religious cognitionAbstract
Research at the intersection of cognitive science and religion can illuminate the cognitive underpinnings of religious thought and behavior, as White (2021) persuasively demonstrates in her comprehensive synthesis of CSR research, but this research can also constrain broader theories of cognition. Here, I examine CSR research relevant to a prominent theory of how we represent minds and bodies: intuitive dualism. This theory, which posits that folk psychology and folk physics are not initially integrated in our representations of intentional agents, makes predictions about god concepts and afterlife beliefs that are not supported by empirical research on these topics. Rather, CSR research suggests that dualism varies by culture and context and must be learned. This case study highlights the reciprocal relation between cognitive science and the study of religion and points to the mutual benefits of their integration.
References
Banerjee, K., Haque, O. S., & Spelke, E. S. (2013). Melting lizards and crying mailboxes: Children’s preferential recall of minimally counterintuitive concepts. Cognitive Science, 37, 1251–1289. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12037
Barlev, M., Mermelstein, S., Cohen, A. S., & German, T. C. (2019). The embodied God: Core intuitions about person physicality coexist and interfere with acquired Christian beliefs about God, the Holy Spirit, and Jesus. Cognitive Science, 43, e12784. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12784
Barlev, M., Mermelstein, S., & German, T. C. (2017). Core intuitions about persons coexist and interfere with acquired Christian beliefs about God. Cognitive Science, 41, 425–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12435
———. (2018). Representational co-existence in the God concept: Core knowledge intuitions of God as a person are not revised by Christian theology despite lifelong experience. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 2330–2338. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1421-6
Barlev, M., & Shtulman, A. (2021). Minds, bodies, spirits, and gods: Does widespread belief in disembodied beings imply that we are inherent dualists? Psychological Review, 128, 1007–1021. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000298
Barrett, H. C., Bolyanatz, A., Broesch, T., Cohen, E., Froerer, P., Kanovsky, M., Schug, M. G., & Laurence, S. (2021). Intuitive dualism and afterlife beliefs: A cross-cultural study. Cognitive Science, 45, e12992. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12992
Barrett, J. L., & Keil, F. C. (1996). Conceptualizing a nonnatural entity: Anthropomorphism in God concepts. Cognitive Psychology, 31, 219–247. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1996.0017
Barrett, J. L., & Richert, R. A. (2003). Anthropomorphism or preparedness? Exploring children’s God concepts. Review of Religious Research, 44, 300–312. https://doi.org/10.2307/3512389
Bering, J. M. (2002). Intuitive conceptions of dead agents’ minds: The natural foundations of afterlife beliefs as phenomenological boundary. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 2, 263–308. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685370260441008
———. (2006). The folk psychology of souls. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29, 453–462. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X06009101
Bloom, P. (2005). Descartes’ baby: How the science of child development explains what makes us human. New York: Basic Books.
———. (2007). Religion is natural. Developmental Science, 10, 147–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00577.x
Boyer, P., & Ramble, C. (2001). Cognitive templates for religious concepts: Cross-cultural evidence for recall of counter-intuitive representations. Cognitive Science, 25, 535–564. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2504_2
Cohen, E., & Barrett, J. (2008). When minds migrate: Conceptualizing spirit possession. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 8, 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1163/156770908X289198
Demertzi, A., Liew, C., Ledoux, D., Bruno, M. A., Sharpe, M., Laureys, S., & Zeman, A. (2009). Dualism persists in the science of mind. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1157, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2008.04117.x
Forstmann, M., Burgmer, P., & Mussweiler, T. (2012). “The mind is willing, but the flesh is weak”: The effects of mind-body dualism on health behavior. Psychological Science, 23, 1239–1245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612442392
Gray, K., Knobe, J., Sheskin, M., Bloom, P., & Barrett, L. F. (2011). More than a body: Mind perception and the nature of objectification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1207–1220. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025883
Guthrie, S. (1993). Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harris, P. L. (2011). Conflicting thoughts about death. Human Development, 54, 160–168. https://doi.org/10.1159/000329133
Hodge, K. M. (2008). Descartes’ mistake: How afterlife beliefs challenge the assumption that humans are intuitive Cartesian substance dualists. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 8, 387–415. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853708X358236
Hook, C. J., & Farah, M. J. (2013). Look again: Effects of brain images and mind-brain dualism on lay evaluations of research. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 1397–1405. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00407
Ladd, K. L., McIntosh, D. N., & Spilka, B. (1998). Children’s God concepts: Influences of denomination, age, and gender. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 8, 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr0801_6
Lane, J. D., Zhu, L., Evans, E. M., & Wellman, H. M. (2016). Developing concepts of the mind, body, and afterlife: Exploring the roles of narrative context and culture. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 16, 50–82. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12342168
Norenzayan, A. (2013) Big gods: How religion transformed cooperation and conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Nye, W. C., & Carlson, J. S. (1984). The development of the concept of God in children. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 145, 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1984.10532259
Preston, J. L., Ritter, R. S., & Hepler, J. (2013). Neuroscience and the soul: Competing explanations for the human experience. Cognition, 127, 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.12.003
Purzycki, B. G., Finkel, D. N., Shaver, J., Wales, N., Cohen, A. B., & Sosis, R. (2012). What does God know? Supernatural agents’ access to socially strategic and non-strategic information. Cognitive Science, 36, 846–869. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01242.x
Richert, R. A., Shaman, N. J., Saide, A. R., & Lesage, K. A. (2016). Folding your hands helps God hear you: Prayer and anthropomorphism in parents and children. Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, 27, 140–157. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004322035_010
Riekki, T., Lindeman, M., Aleneff, M., Halme, A., & Nuortimo, A. (2013). Paranormal and religious believers are more prone to illusory face perception than skeptics and non-believers. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 150–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2874
Saide, A. R., & Richert, R. A. (2020). Socio-cognitive and cultural influences on children’s concepts of God. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 20, 22–40. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12340072
Shtulman, A. (2008). Variation in the anthropomorphization of supernatural beings and its implications for cognitive theories of religion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1123–1138. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0278-7393.34.5.1123
Shtulman, A., Foushee, R., Barner, D., Dunham, Y., & Srinivasan, M. (2019). When Allah meets Ganesha: Developing supernatural concepts in a religiously diverse society. Cognitive Development, 52, 100806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2019.100806
Shtulman, A., & Lindeman, M. (2016). Attributes of God: Conceptual foundations of a foundational belief. Cognitive Science, 40, 635–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12253
Shtulman, A., & Rattner, M. (2018). Theories of God: Explanatory coherence in religious cognition. PLoS ONE, 13, e0209758. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209758
Shtulman, A., & Valcarcel, J. (2012). Scientific knowledge suppresses but does not supplant earlier intuitions. Cognition, 124, 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.04.005
Shtulman, A., & Young, A. G. (2020). Why do logically incompatible explanations seem psychologically compatible? Science, pseudoscience, religion, and superstition. In K. McCain & K. Kampourakis (Eds.), Scientific knowledge? An introduction to contemporary epistemology of science (pp. 163–178). London: Routledge.
White, C. (2015). Establishing personal identity in reincarnation: Minds and bodies reconsidered. The Journal of Cognition and Culture, 15, 403–430. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12342158
———. (2016). The cognitive foundations of reincarnation. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 28, 264–286. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341381
———. (2021). An introduction to the cognitive science of religion: Connecting evolution, brain, cognition and culture. London: Routledge.
Willard, A. K. & Norenzayan, A. (2013). Cognitive biases explain religious belief, paranormal belief, and belief in life’s purpose. Cognition, 129, 379–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.07.016
Published
Issue
Section
License
Equinox Publishing Ltd.
