Cognitively Informed Ethnography
Using Mixed Methods to Capture the Complexity of Religious Phenomena in Two Ecologically Valid Settings
Keywords:ethnography, mixed methods, cognitive science of religion
Here, we present two case studies which combine ethnographic fieldwork with quantitative methods to describe religious behaviour in two ecologically valid settings. Case Study 1 describes the use of mixed methods to explore whether different types of supernatural agents are associated with different categories of moral transgression in Burma, a syncretic and multi-religious environment which naturally lends itself to this question. In this case study, ethnography plays a key role in designing appropriate questionnaire measures, generating hypotheses, and interpreting the behaviour of experimental participants. Case Study 2 describes the use of mixed methods to investigate the interrelationships between religious scandals and the emergence of ex-Catholicism in Ireland, a country noted for its recent and rapid secularization. Here, ethnography plays a key role in elucidating the limitations of early experimental designs and generating further hypotheses, while surveying in turn addresses issues of representativeness in the fieldwork. Together, these case studies serve to illustrate a number of advantages and challenges that come with adopting a mixed methods approach. We close by outlining four reasons for mixing qualitative and quantitative methods when studying religious cognition in the field, using the case studies above as examples. These are: 1) methodological triangulation, 2) assessment of instruments and procedures, 3) qualitative/quantitative iteration, and 4) capturing the current context in scenarios where existing ethnographic research is sparse or deficient.
Ambos, E. 2011. “The Obsolescence of the Demons? Modernity and Possession in Sri Lanka.” In Health and Religious Rituals in South Asia: Disease, Possession and Healing, edited by F. Ferari, 199–212. Abingdon: Routledge.
Bekker, S. M. 1981. “The Concept of Anade: Personal, Social and Political Implications.” In Contributions to Asian Studies, edited by J. P. Ferguson, 19–37. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
Berger, P. (1967) The Sacred Canopy. New York: Anchor.
Bloch, M. (2005) “Where Did Anthropology Go? or the Need for ‘Human Nature’.” In Essays on Cultural Transmission, by M. Bloch, 1–20. Oxford: Berg. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003135500-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003135500-1
Boyer, P. 2001. Religion Explained. London: Verso.
———. 2011. “From Studious Irrelevancy to Consilient Knowledge: Modes of Scholarship and Cultural Anthropology.” In Creating Consilience: Evolution, Cognitive Science and the Humanities, edited by E. Slingerland and M. Collard, 123–157. Oxford University Press.
Brac de la Perrière, B. 2009. “An Overview of the Field of Religion in Burmese Studies.” Asian Ethnology 68(2): 185–210.
Brac de la Perrière, B. 2011. “Being a Spirit Medium in Contemporary Burma.” In Engaging the Spirit World: Popular Beliefs and Practices in Modern Southeast Asia, edited by E. Lauser and K. W. Endres, 163–183. Oxford: Berghahn.
———. 2016. “Spirit Possession: An Autonomous Field of Practice in the Burmese Buddhist Culture.” Journal of Burma Studies 20(1): 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1353/jbs.2016.0002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jbs.2016.0002
Brown, C.G. 2012. Religion and the Demographic Revolution: Women and Secularisation in Canada, Ireland, UK and USA since the 1960s. Woodbridge: Boydell.
Bruce, S. 2002. God Is Dead: Secularization in the West. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bullivant, S. 2017. “Religion in Ireland: Recent Trends and Possible Futures.” Presentation. 24 August. Dublin: Iona Institute.
Casanova, J. 1994. Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226190204.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226190204.001.0001
Davie, G. 1994. Religion in Britain since 1945: Believing without Belonging. Oxford: Blackwell.
Engelhardt, H. T. 1997. “Sins, Voluntary and Involuntary: Recognizing the Limits of Double Effect.” Christian Bioethics: Non-Ecumenical Studies in Medical Morality 3(2): 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1093/cb/3.2.173 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cb/3.2.173
Foxeus, N. 2017. “Contemporary Burmese Buddhism.” In Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Buddhism, edited by M. Jerryson, 212–235. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199362387.013.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199362387.013.2
Gellner, D. N. 1997. “For Syncretism. The Position of Buddhism in Nepal and Japan Compared.” Social Anthropology 5(3): 277–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8676.1997.tb00375.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8676.1997.tb00375.x
Graham, J., J. Haidt, S. Koleva, M. Motyl, R. Iyer, S. Wojcik and P. H. Ditto. 2013. “Moral Foundations Theory: The Pragmatic Validity of Moral Pluralism.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, volume 47, edited by P. Devina and A. Plant, 155–130. Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4
Graham, J., B. Nosek, J. Haidt, R. Iyer, S. Koleva and P. H. Ditto. 2011. “Mapping the Moral Domain.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 101(2): 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847
Gyi, M. M. 1983. Burmese Political Values: The Socio-Political Roots of Authoritarianism. New York: Praeger.
Harvey, P. 2018. “Karma.” In Oxford Handbook of Buddhist Ethics, edited by J. Shields and D. Cozort, 7–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198746140.013.14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198746140.013.14
Henrich, J. 2009. “The Evolution of Costly Displays, Cooperation, and Religion: Credibility Enhancing Displays and Their Implications for Cultural Evolution.” Evolution and Human Behaviour 30: 244–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.03.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.03.005
Henrich, J., S. J. Heine and A. Norenzayan. 2010. “The Weirdest People in the World?” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33(2–3): 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.03.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
Hill, P. C. and K. Pargament. 2017. “Measurement Tools and Issues in the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality.” In Faithful Measures: New Methods in the Measurement of Religion, edited by R. Finke and C. Bader, 56–85. New York: New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479875214.003.0003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479875214.003.0003
Ho, T. C. (2009). “Transgender, Transgression, and Translation: A Cartography of Nat Kadaws: Notes on Gender and Sexuality within the Spirit Cult of Burma.” Discourse 31(3): 273–317.
Hout, M. and C. Fischer. 2014. “Explaining Why More Americans Have No Religious Preference: Political Backlash and Generational Succession, 1987–2012.” Sociological Science 1 (4): 423–457. https://doi.org/10.15195/v1.a24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15195/v1.a24
Inglis, T. 1998. Moral Monopoly: The Rise and Fall of the Catholic Church in Modern Ireland. Dublin: University College.
Iona Institute. 2011. Attitudes towards the Catholic Church. Dublin: Amárach Research.
Lanman, J. 2012. “The Importance of Religious Displays for Belief Acquisition and Secularisation.” Journal of Contemporary Religion 27(1): 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537903.2012.642726 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13537903.2012.642726
Lehman, F. K. 1987. “Burmese Religion.” In The Encyclopedia of Religion, edited by M. Eliade, 574–580. New York: Macmillan.
Luhrmann, T. 2012. When God Talks Back: Understanding the American Evangelical Relationship with God. London: Vintage. https://doi.org/10.24260/alalbab.v1i1.16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24260/alalbab.v1i1.16
Mahadev, N. 2015. “The Maverick Dialogics of Religious Rivalry in Sri Lanka: Inspiration and Contestation in a New Messianic Buddhist Movement.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 22(1): 127–147. https://doi.org/10.24260/alalbab.v1i1.16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12337
Mahathero, P. 2018. The Buddhist Cosmos: A Comprehensive Suvey of the Early Buddhist Worldview, According to Therav?da and Sarv?stiv?da Sources. Independently published.
Manoharan, C. and V. de Munck. 2015. “The Conceptual Relationship between Love, Romantic Love, and Sex: A Free List and Prototype Study of Semantic Association.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 11(2): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815602151 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815602151
Norris, P. and R. Inglehart. 2011. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511894862 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511894862
Norenzayan, A. and W. Gervais. 2013. “The Origins of Religious Disbelief.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17: 20–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.11.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.11.006
Orsi, R. 2017. “What Is Catholic about the Clergy Sex Abuse Crisis?” In The Anthropology of Catholicism: A Reader, edited by K. Norget, V. Napolitano and M. Mayblin, 282-292. Berkeley: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520288423.003.0022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520288423.003.0022
Patton, T. N. 2018. The Buddha’s Wizards: Magic, Protection, and Healing in Burmese Buddhism. New York: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/patt18760 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/patt18760
Pranke, P. 2014. “On Saints and Wizards: Ideals of Human Perfection and Power in Contemporary Burmese Buddhism.” In Champions of Buddhism: Weikza Cults in Contemporary Burma, edited by B. Brac de la Perrière, G. Rozenberg and A. Turner, 3–31. Singapore: NUS Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1qv364.8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1qv364.8
Purzycki, B. G., O. Haque and R. Sosis. 2014. “Extending Evolutionary Accounts of Religion beyond the Mind: Religions as Adaptive Systems.” In Evolution, Religion, and Cognitive Science: Critical and Constructive Essays, edited by F. Watts and L. Turner, 74–91. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199688081.003.0005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199688081.003.0005
Purzycki, B. G., J. Henrich, C. Apicella, Q. D. Atkinson, A. Baimel, E. Cohen, R. A. McNamara, A. K. Willard, D. Xygalatas and A. Norenzayan. 2018. “The Evolution of Religion and Morality: A Synthesis of Ethnographic and Experimental Evidence from Eight Societies.” Religion, Brain & Behavior 8(2): 101–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2016.1267027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2016.1267027
Purzycki, B. G. and A. Jamieson-Lane. 2017. “AnthroTools: An R Package for Crosscultural Ethnographic Data Analysis”. Cross-Cultural Research 51(1): 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397116680352 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397116680352
Redfield, R. 1956. Peasant Society and Culture: An Anthropological Approach to Civilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ribberink, E., P. Achterberg and D. Houtman. 2013. “Deprivatization of Disbelief? Non-Religiosity and Anti-Religiosity in 14 Western European Countries.” Politics and Religion 6: 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048312000740 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048312000740
Romney, A. K. and R. D’Andrade. 1964. “Cognitive Aspects of English Kin Terms.” American Anthropologist 68(3): 146–170. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1964.66.3.02a00870 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1964.66.3.02a00870
Rozenberg, G. 2015. The Immortals: Faces of the Incredible in Buddhist Burma. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press. https://doi.org/10.21313/hawaii/9780824840952.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21313/hawaii/9780824840952.001.0001
Schober, J. 2011. Modern Buddhist Conjunctures in Myanmar: Cultural Narratives, Colonial Legacies, and Civil Society. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824860837 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824860837
Shaver, J., M. Lang, J. Krátký, E. Kundtová-Klocová, R. Kundt and D. Xygalatas. 2018. “The Boundaries of Trust: Cross-religious and Cross-ethnic Field Experiments in Mauritius.” Evolutionary Psychology 16(4): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704918817644 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704918817644
Slingerland, E. and B. Sullivan. 2017. “Durkheim with Data: The Database of Religious History (DRH).” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 85(2): 312–347. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfw012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfw012
Slone, D. J. 2004. Theological Incorrectness: Why Religious People Believe What They Shouldn’t. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195169263.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0195169263.001.0001
Sosis, R. 2016. “Religions as Complex Adaptive Systems.” In Mental Religion: The Brain, Cognition and Culture, edited by N. K. Clements, 219-236. Farmington Hills, MI: MacMillan.
Sperber, D. 1996. Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
Stanford, M. and J. Jong. 2019. “Beyond Buddhism and Animism: A Psychometric Test of the Structure of Burmese Theravada Buddhism.” PLoS ONE 14(12): e0226414. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226414 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226414
Strawn, B. A. 2015. “What Is It Like to Be a Psalmist? Unintentional Sin and Moral Agency in the Psalter.” Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 40(1): 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309089215605795 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309089215605795
Taussig, M. 1998. “Transgression.” In Critical Terms for Religious Studies, edited by M. C. Taylor, 349–364. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tooby, J. and L. Cosmides. (2010). “Groups in Mind: The Coalitional Roots of War and Morality.” In Human Morality & Sociality: Evolutionary & Comparative Perspectives, edited by H. Høgh-Olesen, 191–234. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-05001-4_8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-05001-4_8
Turpin H. 2018. Failing God? A Cognitive Anthropological Examination of the Relationship between Catholic Scandals and Irish Secularisation. PhD dissertation. Queen’s University Belfast / Aarhus University.
Turpin, H., M. Andersen and J. A. Lanman. 2018. “CREDs, CRUDs, and Catholic Scandals: Experimentally Examining the Effects of Religious Paragon Behavior on Co-religionist Belief.” Religion, Brain & Behavior 87: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2018.1439087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2018.1439087
Weafer, J. 2014. Thirty-Three Good Men: Celibacy, Obedience and Identity. Dublin: Columba.
White, E. 2017. “Rethinking Anthropological Models of Spirit Possession and Theravada Buddhism.” Religion and Society 8(1), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.3167/arrs.2017.080112 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3167/arrs.2017.080112
Whitehouse, H. 1995. Inside the Cult: Religious Innovation and Transmission in Papua New Guinea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2007. “Towards an Integration of Ethnography, History and the Cognitive Science of Religion.” In Religion, Anthropology, and Cognitive Science, edited by H. Whitehouse and J. Laidlaw, 247–280. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic.
Willard, A. K. and L. Cingl. 2017. “Testing Theories of Secularization and Religious Belief in the Czech Republic and Slovakia.” Evolution and Human Behavior 38(5): 604–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.01.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.01.002
Willis, G. 2018. “Cognitive Interviewing in Survey Design: State of the Science and Future Directions.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Survey Research, edited by D. Vannette and J. Krosnick, 103–107. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54395-6_14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54395-6_14
Win-Gallup. 2012. “International Index of Religion and Atheism.” https://sidmennt.is/wp-content/uploads/Gallup-International-um-tr%C3%BA-ogtr%C3%BAleysi-2012.pdf
How to Cite
Equinox Publishing Ltd.