Reimagining the Imaginaries

Towards a Biocultural Theory of (Non)religion

Authors

  • Mari Ovsepyan University of Oxford

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/jcsr.37524

Keywords:

social imaginaries, (non)religion, CSR, excarnation, theory of mind

Abstract

A number of scholars of nonreligion and secularity have argued inrecent years for the need to get beyond the neat binaries and the negativeidentities signaled by atheism and agnosticism (e.g. Taves et al.2018). However, these binaries are deeply ingrained in the landscapeof ideas that have shaped the way we do scholarship. I will explore theEnlightenment sense of "excarnation" found in the CSR approachesto (non)religion, and will discuss what has contributed to it being"too much mind, and not enough brain, body, and culture," as ArminGeertz (2010) sums it up.Charles Taylor in his seminal work A Secular Age (2007) makes afamous case against the "subtraction stories" expressed in the popularnarrative as a mere reduction of religious belief. Taylor's interpretationinvolves the radical transformation of the social imaginaries that shapethe way we conceptualize the world we inhabit. Conceptualizingimaginaries as a way of collective production of sense offers a helpfulway of engaging with the question of how differently historied bodiescome to experience and engage with the world in different ways, andleads to the possibility of thinking about the role imaginaries play inreligious experience. In this essay, I will argue for the use of the socialimaginaries as a conceptual tool that contributes to our understandingof local theories of mind, offers a helpful contribution to the bioculturaltheory of (non)religion and functions as a bridge between itscognitive and affective elements.

Author Biography

Mari Ovsepyan, University of Oxford

DPhil student in the Faculty of Theology and Religion at the University of Oxford

References

Agamben, Giorgio. 1993. Infancy and History: Essays on the Destruction of Experience. London: Verso.

Andersen, Marc. 2019. “Predictive Coding in Agency Detection.” Religion, Brain & Behavior 9(1): 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2017.1387170

Asad, Talal. 2003. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

Atran, Scott. 2002. In Gods We Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Barrett, Justin L. 2000. “Exploring the Natural Foundations of Religion.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4(1): 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01419-9

-——. 2004. Why Would Anyone Believe in God? Lanham, MD: AltaMira.

Bloom, Paul. 2009. Descartes’ Baby: How the Science of Child Development Explains What Makes Us Human. New York: Basic Books.

Clark, Andy. 2016. Surfing Uncertainty: Prediction, Action, and the Embodied Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190217013.001.0001

Chemero, Anthony. 2011. Radical Embodied Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

Descartes, R. 1985 [1641]. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Volume 1. Translated by J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff and D. Murdoch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511818998

Dawney, Leila. 2011. “Social Imaginaries and Therapeutic Self-Work: The Ethics of the Embodied Imagination.” The Sociological Review 59(3): 535–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2011.02015.x

De Cruz, Helen. 2013. “Religious Concepts as Structured Imagination.” International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 23(1): 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2013.735495

Fuller, Robert C. 2008. Spirituality in the Flesh: Bodily Sources of Religious Experiences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Geertz, Armin W. 2008. “How Not to Do the Cognitive Science of Religion Today.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 20(1): 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006808X260232

Geertz, Armin W. 2010. “Too Much Mind and Not Enough Brain, Body and Culture: On What Needs to Be Done in the Cognitive Science of Religion.” Historia Religionum. An International Journal 2: 21–37.

Geertz, Armin W. and Guðmundur Ingi Markússon. 2010. “Religion Is Natural, Atheism Is Not: On Why Everybody Is Both Right and Wrong.” Religion 40: 152–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.religion.2009.11.003

Gibbs Jr., Raymond W. 2005. Embodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805844

Gould, Stephen Jay. 1996. The Mismeasure of Man. New York: W. W. Norton.

Guthrie, Stewart. 1993. Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion. New York: Oxford University Press.

---. 2013. “Spiritual Beings: A Darwinian, Cognitive Account.” In The Handbook of Contemporary Animism, edited by Graham Harvey, 353–358. Slough, UK: Acumen.

Guthrie, Stewart, Joseph Agassi, Karin R. Andriolo, David Buchdahl, H. Byron Earhart, Moshe Greenberg, Ian Jarvie, Benson Saler, John Saliba, Kevin J. Sharpe and Georges Tissot. 1980. “A Cognitive Theory of Religion [and Comments and Reply].” Current Anthropology 21(2): 181–203. https://doi.org/10.1086/202429

Henrich, Joseph. 2009. “The Evolution of Costly Displays, Cooperation and Religion: Credibility Enhancing Displays and Their Implications for Cultural Evolution.” Evolution and Human Behavior 30(4): 244–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.03.005

Henrich, Joseph, Steven J. Heine and Ara Norenzayan. 2010. “Beyond WEIRD: Towards a Broad-Based Behavioral Science.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33(2–3): 111–135. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000725

Hodge, K. Mitch. 2008. “Descartes’ Mistake: How Afterlife Beliefs Challenge the Assumption that Humans are Intuitive Cartesian Substance Dualists.” Journal of Cognition and Culture 8(3): 387–415. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853708X358236

Hodge, Mitch K. and Paulo Sousa. 2019. “Dualism, Disembodiment and the Divine: Supernatural Representations in CSR.” In Evolution, Cognition, and the History of Religions: A New Synthesis, edited by A. K. Petersen, I. S. Gilhus, L. H. Martin, J. S. Jensen and J. Sørensen, 309–321. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004385375_021

Johnson, Mark. 2007. The Meaning of the Body: Aesthetics of Human Understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226026992.001.0001

Kundtová Klocová, Eva and Armin W. Geertz. 2019. “Ritual and Embodied Cognition.” In The Oxford Handbook of Early Christian Ritual, edited by Risto Uro, Juliette J. Day, Richard E. DeMaris and Rikard Roitto, 7494. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198747871.013.5

Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.

Lanman, Jonathan. 2013. “Atheism and Cognitive Science.” In The Oxford Handbook of Atheism, edited by Stephen Bullivant and Michael Ruse, 484–494. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199644650.013.030

Lennon, Kathleen. 2004. “Imaginary Bodies and Worlds.” Inquiry 47(2): 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201740410005132

Luhrmann, Tanya. 2011. “Toward an Anthropological Theory of Mind.” Suomen Antropologi: Journal of the Finnish Anthropological Society 36(4): 5–69.

Maij, David L. R., Hein T. van Schie and Michiel van Elk. 2019. “The Boundary Conditions of the Hypersensitive Agency Detection Device: An Empirical Investigation of Agency Detection in Threatening Situations.” Religion, Brain & Behavior 9(1): 23–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2017.1362662

McGrath, Alister E. 2018. The Territories of Human Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198813101.001.0001

Modell, Arnold H. 2003. Imagination and the Meaningful Brain. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3666.001.0001

Nikkel, David H. 2015. “The Dualistic, Discarnate Picture that Haunts the Cognitive Science of Religion.” Zygon 50(3): 621–646. https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12194

Norenzayan, Ara and Will M. Gervais. 2013. “The Origins of Religious Disbelief.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17(1): 20–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.11.006

Norris, Pippa and Ronald Inglehart. 2011. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511894862

Saler, Benson and Charles A. Ziegler. 2006. “Atheism and the Apotheosis of Agency.” Temenos 42(2): 7–41. https://doi.org/10.33356/temenos.4628

Smith, James K. 2012. “Secular Liturgies and the Prospects for a ‘Post-Secular’ Sociology of Religion.” In The Post-Secular in Question: Religion in Contemporary Society, edited by Philip Gorski, David Kyuman Kim, John Torpey and Jonathan Van Antwerpen, 159–184. New York: New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814738726.003.0007

Taves, Ann, Egil Asprem and Elliott D. Ihm. 2018. “Psychology, Meaning Making, and the Study of Worldviews: Beyond Religion and Non-religion.” Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 10(3): 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000201

Taylor, Charles. 2007. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Thomas, Keith. 1971. Religion and the Decline of Magic. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

Van Leeuwen, Neil and Michiel van Elk. 2019. “Seeking the Supernatural: The Interactive Religious Experience Model.” Religion, Brain & Behavior 9(3): 221–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2018.1453529

Published

2020-01-30

How to Cite

Ovsepyan, M. (2020). Reimagining the Imaginaries: Towards a Biocultural Theory of (Non)religion. Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion, 5(1), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1558/jcsr.37524

Issue

Section

Articles