The Only Way to Get Hold of Philosophical Assumptions in CSR Is to Analyze Them

Authors

  • Matti Kamppinen University of Turku

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/jcsr.v3i1.29554

Keywords:

cognitive science of religion, rationality, philosophy of religion, cognition, Ethnography

References

Bunge, Mario. 2012. Evaluating Philosophies. Berlin: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4408-0

Dennett, Daniel C. 1971. “Intentional Systems.” Journal of Philosophy 68(4): 87–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2025382

Dennett, Daniel C. 1978. Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Dennett, Daniel C. 1987. The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Fodor, Jerry. 1983. The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Fodor, Jerry. 1987. Psychosemantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Kamppinen, Matti. 1987. “Structural Explanation in Cognitive Anthropology.” In Recent Developments in Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, edited by Paul Weingartner and Gerhard Schurz, 205–207. Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky Verlag.

Kamppinen, Matti. 2010. Intentional Systems Theory as a Conceptual Framework for Religious Studies. Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press.

Kamppinen, Matti. 2012. Methodological Issues in Religious Studies. Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press.

Karlsson, Hasse and Matti Kamppinen. 1995. “Biological Psychiatry and Reductionism: Empirical Findings and Philosophy.” The British Journal of Psychiatry 167: 434–438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.167.4.434

McCauley, Robert, ed. 1996. The Churchlands and Their Critics. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.

Stich, Stephen. 1983. From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science: A Case Against Belief. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Published

2016-05-03

How to Cite

Kamppinen, M. (2016). The Only Way to Get Hold of Philosophical Assumptions in CSR Is to Analyze Them. Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion, 3(1), 63–67. https://doi.org/10.1558/jcsr.v3i1.29554

Issue

Section

Commentary/Responses