A Framework for the Study of Implicit Religion
The Psychological Theory of Implicit Religiosity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/imre.v6i2.86Keywords:
implicit religion, myth, ritual, transcendent experienceAbstract
A basic, inter-disciplinarily developed theory of implicit religiosity is introduced. Three structures common to all explicit religions are identified: they are myth, ritual, and experience of transcendence. Independent of a content, they can be viewed as patterns of thinking (myth), acting (rituals) and feeling (experiences of transcendence) underlying all kinds of—implicitly or explicitly—religious conduct. Only when associated with personally meaningful contents, do these structures become representatives of implicit religiosity: they turn into ‘personal myth’, ‘personal rituals’ and subjectively accessible transcendent experiences. A qualitative empirical study of contents of implicit religiosity and related ultimate meanings is described. Results are displayed to demonstrate the functional equivalence of implicit and explicit religiosity. An inventory of ultimate meanings as well as a list of contents frequently associated with implicit religion are documented. Finally, the theory of implicit religiosity is used as a framework for the comparison of applications of implicit religion. A synopsis of applications, subdivided into myth, ritual, and transcendent experience, helps to integrate existing research in the field, to determine the scope of the applications, and to display the religious state of contemporary societies.
References
Adler K. (2000) Entzauberung führt zur Erprobung neuer Formen, Das Parlament—Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 19-20. http.//www.dasparlament.de/2000/19_20/Thema/200019200161156.html (19.11.2002). [English translation: TS]
ALLBUS (2000) Allgemeine Bevölkerungsumfrage der Sozialwissenschaften [General Public-Opininion Poll of the Social Sciences], Köln: Zentralarchiv.
Allcock J. B. (2002) Infinite Justice: Implicitly Religious Responses to the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. Paper at the Denton Conference of the Network for the Study of Implicit Religion, May 2002, Yorkshire (UK).
Atlas ti (1997) Visual Qualitative Data Analysis—Management—Model Building, Berlin: Thomas Muhr, Scientific Software Development.
Barz H. (1995) Meine Religion mach ich mir selbst!, Psychologie Heute 7: 20–26.
Bruner J. (1990) Acts of Meaning, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Deutsche Shell (2000) Jugend 2000.13. Shell Jugendstudie, Opladen: Leske+Budrich.
Douglas M. (1974) Ritual, Tabu und Körpersymbolik. Sozialanthropologische Studien in Industriegesellschaft und Stammeskultur, Frankfurt/Main: Fischer.
Driver T.F. (1991) The Magic of Ritual: Our Need for Liberation Rites that Transform our Lives and our Communities, San Francisco: Harper.
Ebertz M.N. (1998) Erosion der Gnadenanstalt. Zum Wandel der Sozialgestalt von Kirche, Frankfurt: Knecht.
Eliade M. (1990) Das Heilige und das Profane, Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp [1957].
Focus (1999) Woran glauben die Deutschen?, Focus 14, 03.04.1999: 118–31.
Glock Ch.Y. (1962) On the Study of Religious Commitment, Religious Education, Research Supplement 57.4: 98–110.
Hartung T. (2000) Soul Sports, Der Zukunftsletter 11: 8.
Kopp E. (1997) Was glauben die Deutschen? DS—Das Sonntagsblatt 25. (http.//www. sonntagsblatt.de/ 1997/25/25-s1.htm (19.11.2002).
Lam P.-Y. (2001) May the Force of the Operating System Be With You: Macintosh Devotion as Implicit Religion, Sociology of Religion 62 (2): 243–62.
Luckmann Th. (1967) The Invisible Religion: The Problem of Religion in Modern Society, New York: Macmillan.
Lütz M. (2002) Gesundheit statt Gottheit, Die Welt, Gastkommentar, 13.03.2002.
Maslow A.H. (1962) Lessons From The Peak-Experiences, Journal of Humanistic Psychology 2: 9–18.
McAdams D. (1993) The Stories We Live By: Personal Myths and the Making of the Self, New York: William Morrow and Co., Inc.
Nathanson P. (1999) I feel, therefore I am: The Princess of Passion and The Implicit Religion Of Our Time, Implicit Religion 2.2: 59–87.
Radcliffe-Brown A.R. (1965) Structure and Function in Primitive Society, Glenco, IL: The Free Press.
Reynolds T. J. and Gutmann, J. (1988) Laddering Theory, Method, Analysis, and Interpretation, Journal of Advertising Research 28(1): 11–31.
Scheppach J. (2001) Der virtuelle Glaube, Der Zukunftsletter 2: 2–3.
Schnell T. (2000) I Believe in Love, Implicit Religion 3.2: 111–22.
—(2002a) Implicit Religiosity—A Psychological Theory of Implicitly Religious Cognition, Behaviour and Experience, With Empirical Data. Paper at the Denton Conference of the Network for the Study of Implicit Religion, May 2002, Yorkshire (UK).
Schnell T. (2002b) Implicit Religiosity and Personality. Poster, European Conference on Personality Psychology (ECP11), July 2002, Jena.
Schnell T. (2002c) Fragebogen zu Lebensbedeutungen (LEBE), unpublished.
Schnell T. (2002d) Fragebogen zur Impliziten Religiosität (FIRE), unpublished.
Schulze G. (1997) The Experience Society, London: Sage.
Sundermeier Th. (1999) Was ist Religion?, Gütersloh: Kaiser, Gütersloher Verlagshaus.
Ter Borg M. (2002) Implicit Religion, Work Ethics and Management. Paper at the Denton Conference of the Network for the Study of Implicit Religion, May 2002, Yorkshire (UK).
Turner V. (1982) Vom Ritual zum Theater: Der Ernst des menschlichen Spiels, Frankfurt/Main: Fischer.
Wirtz U. and Zöbeli, J. (1995) Hunger nach Sinn, Zürich: Kreuz Verlag.
Wulff D. M. (1997) Psychology of Religion: Classic and Contemporary, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
