Implicit Religion from Below

Authors

  • Phillip E Hammond University of California, Santa Barbara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/imre2007.v10i3.281

Keywords:

implicit religion, civil religion, belief-action distinction, Cantwell v. Connecticut

Abstract

As I was writing this paper, I realized that a better title than ‘Implicit Religion from Below’ would have been ‘The Birth and Development of Implicit Religion’. The fact is that little has been written on this topic. Why? Because implicit religions illustrate wonderfully well that aphorism that religion is not created but encountered. Of course, this is the perspective of the believer or practitioner, not that of the scholar of religion. However, even the founder denies making up the doctrine and ethics that he promulgates; instead he ‘receives’ this knowledge; he is only a ‘messenger’.

Author Biography

  • Phillip E Hammond, University of California, Santa Barbara
    Department of Religious Studies, University of California at Santa Barbara, USA

Published

2008-08-21

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Hammond, P. E. (2008). Implicit Religion from Below. Implicit Religion, 10(3), 281-289. https://doi.org/10.1558/imre2007.v10i3.281