Some Ideas about the Persistence of Rituals

Authors

  • M.B. ter Borg University of Leiden, Netherlands

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/imre.v11i1.39

Keywords:

rituals, secularisation

Abstract

In this essay, one particular function of rituals is explored: that of ritual as markers. It is the social importance function as marker that often lends rituals a religious nature, and consequently the religious aspects do not disappear entirely in the course of the process of secularisation, but remain in existence, explicitly at times, and at times also implicitly.

Author Biography

M.B. ter Borg, University of Leiden, Netherlands

University of Leiden, Netherlands P.O. Box 9515 2300 RA Leiden, Netherlands

References

Bell, C. 1997. Ritual: Perspectives and Dimensions. New York: Oxford University Press.

Boyer, P. 2002. Religion explained. New York: Basic Books.

Gennep, A. van. 1960. The Rites of Passage. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity.

Goffman, Erving. 1975. Frame Analysis. New York: Harmondsworth: Penquin Books.

Grimes, R.L. 1996. (ed.). Readings in Ritual Studies. London: Prentice Hall.

Harvey, G., (ed.). 2005. Ritual and Religious Belief: a Reader. London: Equinox.

Laeyendecker, L. 1972. Religion in the Netherlands. In H. Moll, ed., Western Religion, 325–363. The Hague: mouton de Gruyter.

Published

2008-09-05

How to Cite

Borg, M. ter. (2008). Some Ideas about the Persistence of Rituals. Implicit Religion, 11(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1558/imre.v11i1.39

Issue

Section

Articles