Patterns of Secularization and Religious Rationalization in Emile Durkheim and Max Weber
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/imre.v12i2.135Keywords:
secularization, rationalization, Max Weber, Emile Durkheim, sociology of religion, dialectiAbstract
Emile Durkheim’s and Max Weber’s sociologies of religion contain three different patterns of secularization and religious rationalization: the unilinear, the dialectical, and the nonlinear (which includes the paradoxical). Based on an analysis of Durkheim’s and Weber’s writings on religion, this paper argues that the process of religious rationalization and secularization is not always linear but can also take place in a dialectical or paradoxical manner. Whereas in the unilinear and dialectical theories of religious rationalization and secularization there is a progressive development, in the nonlinear or paradoxical theory, development is arrested. While the unilinear and dialectical theories are associated with the Occidental development to modernity, the paradoxical nature of theoretical religious rationalization was characteristic of the “arrested” development of the Orient, while the paradoxical aspects of secularization are associated with unresolved contradictions of modernity (the postmodern).References
Bauman, Zygmunt. 1992. Intimations of Postmodernity. London: Routledge.
_______. 1998. “Postmodern Religion?” In Religion, Modernity and Postmodernity, edited by Paul Heelas, 55–78. Oxford: Blackwell.
Beckford, James. 1985. “Religious Organizations.” In The Sacred in a Secular Age, edited by Philip Hammond, 125–138. Berkeley: University of California Press.
_______. 1989. Religion and Advanced Industrial Society. London: Unwin Hyman.
Bellah, Robert. 1973. “Introduction.” In Emile Durkheim, On Morality and Society, edited by Robert Bellah, ix–lv. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
_______. 1975. The Broken Covenant, American Civil Religion in Time of Trial. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Bendix, Reinhard. 1960. Max Weber, An Intellectual Portrait. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Berger, Peter. 1967. The Sacred Canopy, Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion. New York: Anchor.
Best, Steven and Douglas Kellner. 1997. The Postmodern Turn. New York: The Guilford Press.
Bloch, Ernst. 1995. The Principle of Hope. 3 vols. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Breuer, Stefan. 1988. „Der okzidentale Feudalismus in Max Webers Gesellschaftsgeschichte.“ In Max Webers Sicht des Okzidentalen Christentums, Interpretation und Kritik, edited by Wolfgang Schluchter, 432–475. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Bynum, Caroline Walker. 1988. “Mystik und Askese im Leben mittelalterlicher Frauen, Einige Bemerkungen zu den Typologien von Max Weber und Ernst Troeltsch.” In Max Webers Sicht des Okzidentalen Christentums, Interpretation und Kritik, edited by Wolfgang Schluchter, 355–382. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Casanova, José. 1994. Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Caplow, Theodore, Howard M. Bahr and Bruce A. Chadwick. 1983. All Faithful People, Change and Continuity in Middletown’s Religion. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Coleman, James. 1990. The Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Demerath, Nicholas J. III. 2001. “Secularization Extended, From Religious ‘Myth’ to Cultural Commonplace.” In The Blackwell Companion to Sociology of Religion, edited by Richard K Fenn, 210–228. Oxford: Blackwell.
Dobbelaere, Karel. 1999. “Towards an Integrated Perspective of the Processes Related to the Descriptive Concept of Secularization.” Sociology of Religion 60(3): 229–247.
_______. 1981. Secularization, A Multi-Dimensional Concept. Current Sociology 29(2). London: Sage Publications.
Durkheim, Emile. 1951. Suicide, A Study in Sociology. New York: Free Press.
_______. 1974. Sociology and Philosophy. New York: Free Press.
_______. 1984. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press.
_______. 1994. Durkheim on Religion, edited by W.S.F. Pickering. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press.
_______. 1995. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: Free Press.
Elvin, Mark. 1983. “Warum hat das vormoderne China keinen industriellen Kapitalismus entwickelt? Eine Auseinandersetzung mit Max Webers Ansatz.” In Max Webers Studie über Konfuzianismus und Taoismus, Interpretation und Kritik, edited by Wolfgang Schluchter, 114–133. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Eisenstadt, S.N. 1983. “Innerweltliche Transzendenz und die Strukturierung der Welt. Max Webers Studie über China und die Gestalt der chinesischen Zivilisation.” In Max Webers Studie über Konfuzianismus und Taoismus, Interpretation und Kritik, edited by Wolfgang Schluchter, 363–411, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
_______. 1984. “Die Paradoxie von Zivilisationen mit außerweltlischen Orientierungen, Überlegungen zu Max Webers Studie über Hinduismus und Buddhismus.” In Max Webers Studie über Hinduismus und Buddhismus, edited by Wolfgang Schluchter, 333–362. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
_______. 1985. “This Worldly Transcendentalism, Weber’s ‘Religion of China’ and the Format of Chinese History and Civilization.” Journal of Developing Societies 1: 168–186.
_______. ed., 2002. Multiple Modernities. New Brunswick and London: Transaction.
Fenn, Richard. 1972. “Toward a New Sociology of Religion.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 11: 16–32. doi:10.2307/1384295
Gorksi, Philips S. 2000. “Historicising the Secularization Debate: Church, State, and Society in Late Medieval and Early Modern Europe, ca. 1300 to 1700.” American Sociological Review 65(1):138–167. doi:10.2307/2657295
Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. Theory of Communicative Action, Volume One: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hadden, Jeffrey. 1989. “Desacralizing Secularization Theory.” In Secularization and Fundamentalism Reconsidered, Religion and the Political Order, vol. 3, 3–26. New York: Paragon.
Kalberg, Stephen. 1980. “Max Weber’s Types of Rationality: Cornerstones for the Analysis of Rationalization Processes of History.” American Journal of Sociology 85: 1145–1179. doi:10.1086/227128
_______. 1990. “The Rationalization of Action in Max Weber’s Sociology of Religion.” Sociological Theory 8: 58–84. doi:10.2307/202195
Lechner, Frank J. 1997. “The ‘New Paradigm’ in the Sociology of Religion, Comment on Warner.” American Journal of Sociology 103: 182–192. doi:10.1086/231175
Lyotard, Jean-François. 1984. The Postmodern Condition, A Report On Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Marsh, Robert. 2000. “Weber’s Misunderstanding of Traditional Chinese Law.” American Journal of Sociology 106: 281–302. doi:10.1086/316966
Martin, David. 2005. On Secularization: Towards a Revised General Theory. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Mehta, Pratap Bhanu. 2001. “The Ethical Irrationality of the World, Weber and Hindu Ethics.” Critical Horizons 2: 203–225. doi:10.1163/156851601100412685
Mommsen, Wolfgang. 1974. The Age of Bureaucracy: Perspectives on the Political Sociology of Max Weber. New York: Harper and Row.
Nelson, Benjamin. 1973. “Weber’s Protestant Ethic: Its Origins, Wanderings, and Foreseeable Futures.” In Beyond The Classics, Essays in the Scientific Study of Religion, edited by Charles Glock and Phillip Hammond, 71–130. New York: Harper and Row.
Obeyesekere, Gannanath. 1984. “Exemplarische Prophetie oder ethisch geleitete Askese? Überlegungen zur früh buddhistischen Reform. In Max Webers Studie über Hinduismus und Buddhismus,” edited by Wolfgang Schluchter, 247–273. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
O’Toole, Roger. 1984. Religion, Classic Sociological Approaches. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
Parsons, Talcott. 1937. The Structure of Social Action. New York: Free Press.
_______. 1951. The Social System. New York: Free Press.
_______. 1963. “Introduction,” in Max Weber, The Sociology of Religion. Boston: Beacon.
Pickering, W.S.F. 1984. Durkheim’s Sociology of Religion: Themes and Theories. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Robertson, Roland. 1978. Meaning and Change: Explorations in the Cultural Sociology of Modern Societies. New York: New York University Press.
Rodinson, Maxime. 1974. Islam and Capitalism. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Rosenwein, Barbara. 1988. “Reformmönchtum und der Aufsteig Clunys, Webers Bedeutung für die Forschung heute.” In Max Webers Sicht des Okzidentalen Christentums, Interpretation und Kritik, edited by Wolfgang Schluchter, 276–311. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Said, Edward. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Vintage.
Schluchter, Wolfgang. 1976. “Die Paradoxie der Rationalisierung.” Zeitschrift für Soziologie 5: 256–284.
_______. 1981. The Rise of Western Rationalism: Max Weber’s Developmental History. Berkeley: University of California Press.
_______. 1983. “Einleitung. Max Webers Konfuzianismusstudie-Versuch einer Einordnung.” In Max Webers Studie über Konfuzianismus und Taoismus, Interpretation und Kritik, edited by Wolfgang Schluther, 11–54. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
_______. 1984. “Weltflüchtiges Erlösungsstreben und organische Sozialethik. Überlegungen zu Max Webers Analysen der indischen Kulturreligionen.” In Max Webers Studie über Hinduismus und Buddhismus, edited by Wolfgang Schluchter, 11–71. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
_______. 1988a. Religion und Lebensführung. Band 1. Studien zu Max Weber Kultur und Wertheorie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
_______. 1988b. Religion und Lebensführung. Band 2. Studien zu Max Weber s Religions und Herrschaftsoziologie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
_______. 1988c. “Einleitung. Religion, politische Herrschaft, Wirtschaft und bürgerliche Lebensführung, Die okzidentale Sonderentwicklung.” In Max Webers Sicht des Okzidentalen Christentums, Interpretation und Kritik, edited by Wolfgang Schluchter, 112–128. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
_______. 1989. Rationalism, Religion, and Domination: A Weberian Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.
_______. 1999. “Hindrances to Modernity: Max Weber on Islam.” In Max Weber and Islam, edited by Toby Huff and Wolfgang Schluchter, 53–138. New Brunswick: Transaction.
Sica, Alan. 1988. Weber, Irrationality and Social Order. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Siebert, Rudolf. 2005. “The Critical Theory of Society: The Longing for the Totally Other.” Critical Sociology 31: 57–113. doi:10.1163/1569163053084270
Sorenson, Roy. 2003. A Brief History of the Paradox: Philosophy and the Labyrinths of the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stark, Rodney. 1999. “Secularization, R.I.P.” Sociology of Religion 60(3): 249–273. doi:10.2307/3711936
Stock, Brian. 1988. “Schriftgebrauch und Rationalität im Mittelalter.” In Max Webers Sicht des Okzidentalen Christentums, Interpretation und Kritik, edited by Wolfgang Schluchter. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 165–183.
Tambiah, Stanley. 1984. “Max Webers Untersuchung des frühen Buddhismus, Eine Kritik.” In Max Webers Studie über Hinduismus und Buddhismus, edited by Wolfgang Schluchter, 202–246. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Tenbruck, Friedrich. 1980. “The Problem of thematic unity in the works of Max Weber.” British Journal of Sociology 31: 316–351. doi:10.2307/589370
Tibi, Bessam. 1998. The Challenge of Fundamentalism: Political Islam and the New World Disorder. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Tschannen, Oliver. 1991. “The Secularization Paradigm: A Systematization.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 30: 395–415. doi:10.2307/1387276
Turner, Bryan S. 1974. Weber and Islam: A Critical Study. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Warner, R. Stephen. 1993. “Work in Progress toward a new Paradigm for the Sociological Study of Religion in the United States.” American Journal of Sociology 98: 1044–1093. doi:10.1086/230139
Weber, Max. 1930. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Translated by Talcott Parsons. London: Routledge.
_______. 1946. From Max Weber, Essays in Sociology. Edited by H.H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
_______. 1951. The Religion of China. New York: Free Press.
_______. 1952. Ancient Judaism. New York: Free Press.
_______. 1963. The Sociology of Religion. Boston, MA: Beacon.
_______. 1978. Economy and Society. 2 vols., edited by Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. Berkeley: University of California Press.
_______. 1988a. Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie II. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.
_______. 1988b. Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie III. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.
_______. 1996. The Religion of India, The Sociology of Hinduism and Buddhism. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.
_______. 2002. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Translated by Stephen Kalberg. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
Yamane, David. 1997. “Secularization on Trial, In Defense of Neosecularization Paradigm.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 36(1): 109–122. doi:10.2307/1387887
