"Spirituality" as Privatized Experience-Oriented Religion
Empirical and Conceptual Perspectives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/imre.v14i4.433Keywords:
spirituality, mysticism, religion, James, Schleiermacher, Weber, TroeltschAbstract
Recent empirical studies demonstrate that a growing number of people contrast “spirituality” and “religion,” self-identifying as “spiritual, but not religious” or as “more spiritual than religious.” This shift in everyday semantic preference, from “religion” to “spirituality,” has also affected the terminology of the scientific study of religion, producing some uncertainty and ambivalence regarding the conceptualization of spirituality. This is critically discussed. To inspire reflection, the article refers to some classics in philosophy, psychology and sociology of religion. The aim is twofold: first, to take the self-description “spiritual” very seriously, and inspire more thoroughgoing and sophisticated research; second, to call into question the necessity of conceptualizing ‘spirituality’ and to suggest that the concept of ‘religion’ is sufficient, because “spirituality” can be understood as privatized, experience-oriented religion.References
Bailey, E.I. 1997. Implicit Religion in Contemporary Society. Kampen: Kok.
Bellah, R.N., R. Madsen, W.M. Sullivan, A. Swidler and S. M. Tipton, eds. 1985. Habits of the Heart, revised ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bouyer, L. 1980. “Mysticism: An Essay in the History of the Word.” In Understanding Mysticism, edited by R. Woods, 42–55. Garden City, NY: Image.
Comte-Sponville, A. 2007. The Little Book of Atheist Spirituality. Translated by Nancy Huston. New York: Viking Press.
Daiber, K.-F. 2002. “Mysticism: Troeltsch’s Third Type of Religious Collectivities.” Social Compass 49(3): 329–341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0037768602049003002
Day, J.M. 1991. “Narrative, Psychology and Moral Education.” Journal of the American Psychological Association 46: 167–178.
———. 1994. “Moral Development, Belief and Unbelief: Young Adult Accounts of Religion in the Process of Moral Growth.” In Belief and Unbelief. Psychological Perspectives, edited by J. Corveleyn and D. Hutsebaut, 155–173. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi.
Elkins, D.N. 2001. “Beyond Religion: Toward a Humanistic Spirituality.” In The Handbook of Humanistic Psychology: Leading Edges in Theory, Research and Practice, edited by K.J. Schneider, J.T. Bugental and J.F. Pierson, 201–212. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Emmons, R.A. and C.A. Crumpler. 1999. “Religion and Spirituality? The Roles of Sanctification and the Concept of God.” The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 9(1): 17–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr0901_3
Exline, J.J. and A. Martin. 2005. “Anger Toward God: A New Frontier in Forgiveness Research.” In Handbook of Forgiveness, edited by E.I. Worthington, 73–88. New York and London: The Guilford Press.
Gorsuch, R.L. and W.R. Miller. 1999. “Assessing Spirituality.” In Integrating Spirituality Into Treatment: Resources for Practitioners, edited by W.R. Miller, 47–64. Washington: APA. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10327-003
Hathaway, W.I., R.W. Hood, L. Miler, R.F. Paloutzian, K.I. Pargament and C.L. Park. 2004. Discussion: Psychology of Religion or Psychology of Religion and Spirituality? Should the Division Include Spirituality in Its Name? Paper for the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto.
Hill, P.C., K.I. Pargament, R.W. Hood, M.E. McCullough, J.P. Swyers, D.B. Larson, et al. 2000. “Conceptualizing Religion and Spirituality: Points of Commonality, Points of Departure.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 30: 51–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-5914.00119
Hood, R.W. 1975. “The Construction and Preliminary Validation of a Measure of Reported Mystical Experience.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 14: 29–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1384454
———. 1995. “The Soulful Self of William James.” In The Struggle for Life: A Companion of William James’ The Varieties of Religious Experience, edited by D.W. Capps and J.L. Jacobs, 209–219. West Lafayette, IN: Society for the Scientific Study of Religion.
———. 2003a. “Conceptual and Empirical Consequences of the Unity Thesis.” In Mysticism: A Variety of Psychological Perspectives, edited by J.A. Belzen and A. Geels, 17–54. New York: Rodopi.
———. 2003b. “Spirituality and Religion.” In Religion: Critical Approaches to Drawing Boundaries between Sacred and Secular, edited by A.L. Greil and D.G. Bromley, 241–264. Amsterdam: Elsevier. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1061-5210(03)10014-X
———. 2006. “The Common Core Thesis in the Study of Mysticism.” In Where God and Science Meet: How Brain and Evolutionary Studies Alter our Understanding of Religion, Vol. 3, edited by P. McNamara, 119–138. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
Hood, R.W., P.C. Hill and B. Spilka. 2009. The Psychology of Religion: An Empirical Approach, 4th ed. New York: Guilford Press.
Houtman, D. and S. Aupers. 2007. “The Spiritual Turn and the Decline of Tradition: The Spread of Post-Christian Spirituality in 14 Western Countries, 1981–2000.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 46: 305–320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2007.00360.x
James, W. 1902. 1944. The Varieties of Religious Experience. A Study in Human Nature. New York: Random House.
Kalton, M.C. 2000. “Green Spirituality: Horizontal Transcendence.” In The Psychology of Mature Spirituality: Integrity, Wisdom, Transcendence, edited by P. Young-Eisendrath and M.E. Miller, 187–200. London: Routledge.
Katz, S.T. 1983. Mysticism and Religious Traditions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Keysar, A. 2007. “Who are America’s Atheists and Agnostics?” In Secularism and Secularity. Contemporary International Perspectives, edited by B.A. Kosmin and A. Keysar, 33–39. Hartford, CT: Institute for the Study of Secularism in Society and Culture, Trinity College.
Kosmin, B.A. and A. Keysar. 2007. Secularism and Secularity. Contemporary International Perspectives, online at: http://prog.trincoll.edu/ISSSC/Book/Chapters.asp.
Luckmann, T. 1967. The Invisible Religion: The Problem of Religion in Modern Society. New York: Macmillan.
Marler, P.L. and C.K. Hadaway. 2002. “ ‘Being Religious’ or ‘Being Spiritual’ in America: A Zero-Sum Proposition?” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 41: 289–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-5906.00117
Miller, W.R. and C.E. Thoresen. 2003. “Spirituality, Religion and Health—An Emerging Research Field.” American Psychologist 58: 24–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.1.24
Pargament, K.I. 1999a. “The Psychology of Religion and Spirituality? Response to Stifoss-Hanssen, Emmons and Crumpler.” The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 99: 35–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr0901_5
———. 1999b. “The Psychology of Religion and Spirituality? Yes and No.” The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 99: 3–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr0901_2
Parsons, W. B. 1999. The Enigma of the Oceanic Feeling: Revisioning the Psychoanalytic Theory of Mysticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pasquale, F. L. 2007. “The ‘Nonreligious’ in the American Northwest.” Online at: http://prog.trincoll.edu/ISSSC/Book/Chapters.asp, 2008-9-3.
Roof, W.C. 1993. A Generation of Seekers: The Spiritual Journeys of the Baby Boom Generation. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
———. 1999. Spiritual Marketplace: Baby Boomers and the Remaking of American Religion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Schleiermacher, F. 1799. On Religion. Speeches to its Cultured Despisers. Translated and edited by Richard Crouter. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Schnell, T. 2008. “Implizite Religiosität: Vielfalt von Lebensbedeutungen in religiösen Ausdrucksformen. “In Individualisierung—Spiritualität—Religion: Transformationsprozesse auf dem religiösen Feld in interdisziplinärer Perspektive, edited by W. Gräb and L. Charbonnier, 83–107. Münster: Lit Verlag,
———. 2009. “The Sources of Meaning and Meaning in Life Questionnaire (SoMe): Relations to Demographics and Well-being.” The Journal of Positive Psychology 4: 483–499.
Schnell, T. and W.J.F. Keenan. 2010. “A Trace of Spiritual Atheism.” Paper for the First International Conference of the British Association for the Study of Spirituality, Windsor, May 2010.
———. 2011. “Meaning-Making in an Atheist World.” Archive for the Psychology of Religion/Archiv für Religionspsychologie 33: 55–78.
Shafranske, E.P. 1996. “Religious Beliefs, Practices and Affiliations of Clinical Psychologists.” In Religion and the Clinical Practice of Psychology, edited by E.P. Shafranske, 149–164. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10199-005
Simmel, G. 1911. Verhandlungen des Ersten Deutschen Soziologentages vom 19-22. Oktober 1910 in Frankfurt a.M. Tübingen: Schriften der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie, I. Serie, Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
Streib, H. 2005. “Research on Life Style, Spirituality and Religious Orientation of Adolescents in Germany.” In Religion, Education and Adolescence: International and Empirical Perspectives, edited by L. J. Francis, M. Robbins and J. Astley, 131–163. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
———. 2008. “More Spiritual than Religious: Changes in the Religious Field Require New Approaches.” In Lived Religion: conceptual, empirical and practical-theological approaches, edited by H. Streib, A. Dinter and K. Söderblom, 53–67. Leiden: Brill. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004163775.i-404.30
———. 2011 (in press). “Deconversion.” In Oxford Handbook on Religious Conversion, edited by L.R. Rambo and C.E. Farhadian, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Streib, H., R.W. Wood, B. Keller, R.–M. Csöff and C. Silver. 2009. Deconversion. Qualitative and Quantitative Results from Cross-Cultural Research in Germany and the United States of America. Research in Contemporary Religion 5. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.
Streib, H. and C. Klein. 2011. The Spirituality of Atheists, Agnostics and Deconverts. Paper for the Conference of the International Association for the Psychology of Religion (IAPR), Bari, Italy August 2011.
Thomas, G. 2001. Implizite Religion. Theoriegeschichtliche und theoretische Untersuchungen zum Problem ihrer Identifikation. Religion in der Gesellschaft 7. Würzburg: Ergon.
Troeltsch, E. 1912. The Social Teaching of the Christian Churches, Vol. 2. London and New York: George Allen and Unwin; MacMillan 1956.
———. 1911. Das stoisch-christliche Naturrecht und das moderne profane Naturrecht. In Verhandlungen des Ersten Deutschen Soziologentages vom 19-22. Oktober 1910 in Frankfurt a.M., 166–214. Tübingen: Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
Weber, M. 1921. Wirtschaft und Gesellschafft. Grundriß der verstehenden Soziologie, vol 2, chapter 5, “Religionssoziologie,” 245–381. Tübingen: J.C.B.Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
Whiteley, J. and Loxley, J. 1980. “A Curriculum for the Development of Character and Community in College Students.” In Developmental Counseling and Teaching, edited by L. Erickson and J. Whiteley, 262–297. Monterey: Brooks/Cole.
Yamane, D. 2007. “Introduction: Habits of the Heart at 20.” Sociology of Religion 68: 179–187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/socrel/68.2.179
Zinnbauer, B.J. and K.I. Pargament. 2005. “Religiousness and Spirituality.” In Handbook of the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, edited by R.F. Paloutzian and C.L. Park, 21–42. New York, London: The Guilford Press.
Zinnbauer, B.J., K.I. Pargament, B. Cole, M.S. Rye, E.M. Butter, T.G. Belavich, et al. 1997. “Religion and Spirituality: Unfuzzying the Fuzzy.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 36: 549–564. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1387689
