The Emergence of Post-dogmatic Religion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/imre.v15i4.423Keywords:
post-dogmatic, religious doctrines, religious emotions, autonomization, democratization, religious socializationAbstract
Historically, religion in Western Europe has tended to be defined by churches which distinguish themselves doctrinally. Therefore, religion is commonly thought of in doctrinal, cognitive terms. However, since the Second World War ended by affirming democracy and human rights, the pedagogical system has been subject to a silent revolution, and consequently, religion has been subject to a subtle change. New generations have been taught to question authorities, including religious ones. Religion has become regarded less as allegiance to doctrines and more as an emotional affiliation. This post-dogmatic stance is not implicitly superficial, volatile or egocentric. It may be intense, integrated and social. It is however related to other types of networks and media than those of the traditional churches, and therefore is more difficult to trace sociologically.References
Allchin, Arthur Macdonald. 1997. N.F.S. Grundtvig : an introduction to his life and work. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
Argyle, Michael, and Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi. 1975. The Social Psychology of Religion. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Balsnes, Anne and Ole Riis. Forthcoming. “Bach’s Passion Music in a Late Modern Context.” Journal of Contemporary Religion.
Barker, Eileen et al, eds. 1993. Secularization, Rationalism and Sectarianism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Berger, Peter. 1967. The Sacred Canopy. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
———, et al. 2008. Religious America, Secular Europe? A Theme and Variations. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Bruce, Steve, ed. 2001. Religion and Modernization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Day, Abby. 2011. Believing in Belonging. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199577873.001.0001
Dobbelaere, Karel. 2002. Secularization: An Analysis at three Levels. Bruxelles: P.I.E.-Peter Lang.
——— and Ole Riis. 2002. “Religious and Moral Pluralism: Theories, Research, Questions, and Design.” In Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion 13: 159–172.
———, Luigi Tomasi and Liliane Voyé. 2002. “Religious Synchretism.” Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion 13: 205–220.
Durkheim, Émile. 1954. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Ellwood, Robert. 2008. Introducing Japanese Religion. New York: Routledge.
Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gustafsson, Göran and Thorlief Pettersson, eds. Folkkyrkor och religiös pluralism – den nordiske religiöse modellen. [Folk Churches and Religious Pluralism, the Nordic Model of Religion]. Stockholm: Verbum.
Halman, Loek and Ole Riis. 2002. Religion in Secularizing Society. Brill: Leiden.
Hervieu-Léger, Daniéle 1993. La Religion pour Mémoire. Paris: Cerf.
Luckmann, Thomas. 1967. The Invisible Religion. New York: Macmillan.
Norris, Pippa and Ron Inglehart. 2004. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. Cambrige: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791017
Riis, Ole and Linda Woodhead. 2010. A Sociology of Religious Emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567607.001.0001
Smart, Ninian. 1997. Dimensions of the Sacred. Fontana: London.
Simmel, Georg. 1997. Essays on Religion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
