Let Modesty Be Her Raiment
The Classical Context of Ancient-Christian Veiling
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/imre.v16i4.493Keywords:
veil, modesty, Greek, Roman, early-Christianity, PaulAbstract
Our societal obsession with hair and how it looks seems to know no bounds. Consumers are bombarded with innovative advertisements telling us that our hair is always in need of a miraculous product that can change our lives forever. Contrastingly, sensationalized media reports, which accomplish little else than instilling fear of the “Other,” have no shortage of images of presumably oppressed and unhappy Muslim women, who are almost always veiled in a chador, burqa, or even simply the hijab. Often seen as the most poignant characteristic of the Islamic civilization, the veil is consistently portrayed as a symbol of repression, patriarchal tyranny, barbarism, and even anti-western sentiment (Heath 2008, 18). However, veiling also has a crucial place in the main religious tradition of the Western world, Christianity. In this article, I argue that early Christian women often understood this practice as indicating modesty and respectability. For many Christians, women’s veiling was an important part of their religious identity and moral values. As modesty was the dominant justification for women’s veiling in the Greek and Roman worlds, Christians who observed and promoted the veil were building on the values and practices of their cultural environment. Eventually, however, the Christian veil was reserved for consecrated virgins, and the Latin Church fathers wrote copiously to instill its observance. This article will examine the practice of veiling in antiquity, beginning with Greco-Roman cultural norms, followed by Paul’s instructions to Corinthian women, and concluding with Ambrose of Milan’s treatment of the subject in relation to consecrated virgins. This trajectory will demonstrate that the practice of veiling evolved these three periods; however, its core purpose of safeguarding modesty, remained embedded during each of them.References
Ambrose. Ambrose: Select Works and Letters. Edited by Phillip Schaff.
“Concerning Repentence” http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf210.html. Accessed 20 April 2009.
“Concerning Virgins” http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf210.html. Accessed April 20, 2009.
Baskin, Judith Reesa. 2002. Midrashic Women: Formations of the Feminine in Rabbinic Literature. Hanover: University of New England for Brandeis University Press.
Brown, Peter. 1988. The Body and Society: Men, Women and Sexual Renunciation in Early Christianity. New York: Columbia University Press.
Burrus, Virginia.1994. “Word and Flesh: The Bodies and Sexuality of Ascetic Women in Christian Antiquity.” Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 10(1), (Spr 1994): 27–51.
Carson, Anne. 1991. “Putting her in her Place: Woman, Dirt and Desire.” In Before Sexuality: the Construction of Erotic Experience in the Ancient Greek World, edited by David M. Halperin, John J. Winkler, and Froma I. Zeitlin, 135–169. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Clark, E. A. 1995. “Antifamilial Tendencies in Ancient Christianity.” Journal of the History of Sexuality 5: 356–380.
Cohen, Shaye, J.D. 1999. The Beginnings of Jewishness: Boundaries, Varieties, Uncertainties. Berkeley: University of California Press.
D’Angelo, Mary Rose. 1995. “Veils, Virgins and the Tongues of Men and Angels: Women’s Heads in Early Christianity.” In Off with her head!: The Denial of Women’s Identity in Myth, Religion, and Culture, edited by Howard Eilberg-Schwartz and Wendy Doniger, 131–163. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Evans, Roger Steven. 2003. Sex and Salvation: Virginity as a Soteriological Paradigm in Ancient Christianity. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Heath, Jennifer. 2008. “Introduction.” In The Veil: Women Writers on its History, Lore and Politics, edited by Jennifer Heath, 1–26. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Hunter, David G. 1999. “Clerical Celibacy and the Veiling of Virgins: New Boundaries in late Ancient Christianity.” In Limits of Ancient Christianity, 139–152. Ann Arbor: Univiversity of Michigan Press.
Jensen, Anne.1996. God’s Self-Confident Daughters: Early Christianity and the Liberation of Women. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press.
Langlands, Rebecca. 2006. Sexual Morality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511482823
Llewellyn-Jones, Lloyd. 2003. Aphrodite’s Tortoise: The Veiled Women of Ancient Greece. Swansea, Wales: The Classical Press of Wales.
Martin, Troy W. 2004. “Paul’s Argument from Nature for the Veil in 1 Corinthians 11:13-15: A Testicle Instead of a Head Covering.” Journal of Biblical Literature 123(1): 75–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3268550
Olson, Kelly. 2008. Dress and the Roman Woman: Self-presentation and Society. London: Routledge,
Schreiber, Lynne. 2003. “Halachot of Hair.” In Hide and Seek: Jewish Women and Hair Covering, edited by Lynne Schreiber, 197–209. New York: Urim.
Scott, Joan Wallach. 2007. The Politics of the Veil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Thompson, Cynthia L. 1988.“Hairstyles, Head-coverings, and St Paul: Portraits from Roman Corinth.” Biblical Archaeologist 51(2): 99–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3210030
Winter, W. Bruce. 2001. After Paul Left Corinth: The Influence of Secular Ethics and Social Change. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.