Religious and Scientific Forces of Commoditization of Implicit Religion with Their Custodians as “Entrepreneurs”

Authors

  • Sonali Bhattacharya Associate Professor, Symbiosis Centre for Management and Human Resource Development (SCMHRD), Symbiosis International University, [email protected]
  • Shubhasheesh Bhattacharya Symbiosis Institute of International Business (SIIB)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/imre.v17i3.275

Keywords:

Religion, Science, Entrepreneurs, Rationalism, Mysticism

Abstract

In this article we take a fresh look, in the context of implicit religion (characterized by commitment, integrating foci and intensive concerns with extensive effects), at some contemporary explicit religious phenomena, and suggest that there is little significant difference between them and certain phenomena in natural science that have a welfare motive. Examples have been drawn from India to depict how different versions of explicit religion have been commoditized by their advocates, acting almost as entrepreneurs, and how the success or failure of such organizations depends, at least in part, on their relative compliance with, or deviation from, their welfare motive, suggesting that it is the motivation (best understood as implicit religion) lying behind the entrepreneurialism, that can unite both gurus and scientists.

References

ABP News Bureau. 2012. STAR News Exclusive: Hard Facts About Nirmal Baba, 12th April.

Alter, Joseph S. 1997. “Seminal Truth: a Modern Science of Male Celibacy in North India.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 11(3): 275–298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/maq.1997.11.3.275

Bailey, Edward. 2012. “‘Implicit Religion?’: What Might That Be?.” Implicit Religion 15(2): 9–22 .

CNN.com. 2003. “Doubt Over Mother Teresa’s Miracle”, 17th October. http://edition.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/europe/10/17/vatican.teresa/

Colebrooke, Henry Thomas. 1977. Essays on History, Literature, and Religions of Ancient India: Miscellaneous Essays, vol. 1. New Delhi: Peace Cosmo Publications.

Copeman, Jacob and Aya Ikegame. 2012. “Guru Logics.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2(1): 289–336. http://dx.doi.org/10.14318/hau2.1.014

Culliton, James W. 1949. “Business and Religion.” Harvard Business Review 27(3): 265–271.

———. 1959. “A Marketing Analysis of Religion: Can Businesslike Methods Improve the ‘Sales’ of Religion?” Business Horizons 2(1): 85–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(59)90046-1

Ghosh, Prabir. 2006. “The Mystery of Mother Teresa and Sainthood.” www.uniqueebook.com/freee-books/Mother_Teresa_Preview.pdf

Güleç, C. 2002. “Kültür ve Psikiyatri Yazilari.” Ankara: HYB Yayincilik .

Honer, Stanley M., Thomas C. Hunt, and Dennis L. Okholm. 1982. Invitation to Philosophy: Issues and Options. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Karanth, R. V. 2006. “Astrology and Science.” Current Science Bangalore 91(5): 567.

Miller, Jon D. 1983. “Scientific Literacy: A Conceptual and Empirical Review.” Daedalus 112(2): 29–48.

———. 2004. “Public Understanding of, and Attitudes toward, Scientific Research: What We Know and What We Need to Know.” Public Understanding of Science 13(3): 273–294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963662504044908

Nanda, Meera. 2011. The God Market: How Globalization Is Making India More Hindu. New York: New York University Press.

———. 2006. “How Modern Are We? Cultural Contradictions of India’s Modernity.” Economic and Political Weekly 41(6): 491–496.

Narlikar, Jayant V., Sudhakar Kunte, Narendra Dabholkar, and Prakash Ghatpande. 2009. “A Statistical Test of Astrology.” Current Science 96(5): 641–643.

Nautiyal, C. M. 2008. “A Look at S&T Awareness-Enhancements in India.” Journal of Science Communication 7(2): 1–10.

NDTV. 2013. “After Rationalist Narendra Dabholkar’s Killing, Maharashtra Govt Clears Anti-superstition Ordinance,” 21st August.

Oliver, Henry M. 1958. “Trends toward a New Moral Philosophy for Business.” Business Horizons 1(2): 33–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(58)90037-5

Open Magazine. 2013. “Dark Side of Asaram Bapu.” 9th February.

Prasad, Ajit. 2005. “Jesus Was Born a Jew!: Strategy, Religion and the Product Life Cycle.” Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective 9(1): 37–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/097226290500900105

Raina, Dhruv. 1990. “Commoditized Science or Science for consumption?” Economic and Political Weekly 25(40), October 6: 2245–2247.

Ramachandran, T. 2013. Why Kedarnath Happened? Frontline, 26th July.

Russ, A. 2011. “ Deadwood” and “John From Cincinnati”: Societies of Faith and the Incognito God. Estudios interdisciplinarios sobre la ficción televisiva en la Tercera Edad de Oro de la Televisión, 265–278.

Sahlins, Marshall. 1994. “Cosmologies of Capitalism: The Trans-Pacific Sector of ‘The World System.’” In Culture/power/history: A Reader in Contemporary Social Theory, edited by Nicholas B. Dirks, Geoff Eley and Sherry B. Ortner, 412–455. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Sharp, Lesley A. 2000. “The Commodification of the Body and its Parts.” Annual Review of Anthropology 29: 287–328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.287

Singh, Khushwant. 2003. Gods and Godmen of India. Noida, Uttar Pradesh: HarperCollins.

Siddhantalankar, S. 1983. From Old Age to Youth Through Yoga (with Homeopathic and Other Treatments). New Delhi: Chandravati Lakhanpal Trust Society.

Shukla, R. 2005. India Science Report: Science Education, Human Resources and Public Attitude Towards Science and Technology (No. 22137). East Asian Bureau of Economic Research. www.eaber.org/sites/default/files/documents/ncaer_shukla_2005.pdf

Tan, S. 1990. “Religion in Clinical Practice: Implicit and Explicit Integration.” Religion 27(1): 365–387.

Trevors, Jack T. and Milton H. Saier Jr. 2012. “Mysticism and Science: Two Products of the Human Imagination,” Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 5(1): 25–28

Urban, Hugh B. 2003. Tantra: Sex, Secrecy, Politics, and Power in the Study of Religion. London: University of California Press.

Yogeshwaranand. 1985. First Steps to Higher Yoga. Delhi: Yoga Niketan Trust.

Published

2014-12-01

How to Cite

Bhattacharya, S., & Bhattacharya, S. (2014). Religious and Scientific Forces of Commoditization of Implicit Religion with Their Custodians as “Entrepreneurs”. Implicit Religion, 17(3), 275–295. https://doi.org/10.1558/imre.v17i3.275

Issue

Section

Articles