Contemporary Tibetan Monastic Business and the Corporate Form

Authors

  • Jane Caple University of Manchester

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/imre.27491

Keywords:

corporate form, Geluk, Tibetan Buddhism, business, monastic

Abstract

In early twenty-first century Tibet, many Geluk monasteries established capital funds that they invested in small businesses—the Geluk being one of the main Tibetan Buddhist traditions. Drawing on fieldwork in northeast Tibet, this article examines debates surrounding this monastic engagement in business, asking why it proved contentious despite historical and canonical precedent. I approach this question by thinking about monastic business engagement in relation to Geluk monasticism as a distinctive corporate form. Foregrounding how monks made sense of what they were doing as corporate actors, I examine common rationales, concerns, 
and questions of legitimacy at the heart of arguments both for and against monastic business development, and how these related to the monastic corporation’s core concern with preservation and continuity. The article concludes with some broader reflections on what these debates can tell us about the ongoing process of corporation-making, suggesting some possible avenues for future research.

References

Anello, Giancarlo, Mohamed A. Arafa, and Sergio Alberto Gramitto Ricci. 2021. “Sacred corporate law.” Seattle University Law Review 45: 413–461. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4197184

Aoki, Masahiko. 2010. Corporations in evolving diversity: Cognition, governance, and institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199218530.001.0001

Bakan, Joel. 2005 [2004]. The corporation: The pathological pursuit of profit and power. London: Constable.

Baars, Gretje, and Andre Spicer, eds. 2017. The corporation: A critical, multidisciplinary handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139681025

BEIS. 2016. Corporate governance reform: green paper. Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy, UK Government. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/584013/corporate-governance-reform-green-paper.pdf

Brox, Trine, and Elizabeth Williams-Oerberg. 2020. Buddhist and business: Merit, material wealth, and morality in the global market economy. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.

Brumann, Christoph, Saskia Abrahms-Kavunenko, and Beata Switek, eds. 2021. Monks, money, and morality: The balancing act of contemporary Buddhism. London: Bloomsbury

Caiwang Naoru, 2009. “Qing dajia jingti mosheng de ‘song’ tangkazhe.” http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4bc909050100bpl8.html (page discontinued).

Caple, Jane. 2019. Morality and monastic revival in post-Mao Tibet. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv7r42r5

———. 2021a. “Monastic business expansion in post-Mao Tibet: Risk, trust, and perception.” In Monks, money, and morality: The balancing act of contemporary Buddhism, edited by Christoph Brumann, Saskia Abrahms-Kavunenko, and Beata Switek, 159–178. London: Bloomsbury.

———. 2021b. “Feeling apart: Relations of Belonging in Tibetan Buddhist Lay-Monastic Communities.” Numen (5–6): 463–487.

Caple, Jane and Sarah Roddy. 2022. “Histories of religious fundraising: Religion, economy, and value in global perspective: introduction.” Journal of Cultural Economy 16(5): 655–664.

Catanese, Alex John. 2019. Buddha in the marketplace: The commodification of Buddhist objects in Tibet. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.

Ciepley, David. 2019. “The neoliberal corporation.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Corporation, edited by Thomas Clarke et al., 274–296. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198737063.013.14

Clarke, Thomas, Justin O'Brien, and Charles R. T. O’Kelley. 2019. “The evolving corporation: Economy, law, and society.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Corporation, edited by Thomas Clarke et al., 1–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198737063.013.1

Davoudi, Leonardo, Christopher McKenna, and Rowena Olegario. 2018. “The historical role of the corporation in society.” The Journal of the British Academy 6(s1): 17–47. https://doi.org/10.5871/jba/006s1.017

Dewey, William K. 2020. “The Samgha and the taxman: A Tibetan regent’s economic reforms and the ethics of rulership.” Journal of Buddhist Ethics 27: 123–159. https://blogs.dickinson.edu/buddhistethics/2020/04/26/a-tibetan-regents-economic-reforms-and-the-ethics-of-rulership/

Dhondup, Yangdon, Ulrich Pagel, and Geoffrey Samuel, eds. 2013. Monastic and lay traditions in northeast Tibet. Leiden: Brill.

Dreyfus, Georges. 2003. The sound of two hands clapping: The education of a Tibetan Buddhist monk. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Ellingson, Ter. 1990. “Tibetan monastic constitutions: The bca’ yig.” In Reflections on Tibetan culture: Essays in memory of Turrell V. Wylie, edited by Lawrence Epstein and Richard F. Sherburne, 205–229. Lewiston, NY: Edward Mellen Press.

Fischer, Andrew. 2008. “The Muslim cook, the Tibetan client, his lama and their boycott: modern religious discourses of anti-Muslim economic activism in Amdo.” In Conflict and social order in Tibet and Inner Asia, edited by Fernanda Pirie and Toni Huber, 159–192. Leiden: Brill.

Foster, Robert J. 2017. “The corporation in anthropology.” In The corporation: A critical, multidisciplinary handbook, edited by Gretje Baars and Andre Spicer, 111–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139681025.006

French, Rebecca, and Mark Nathan. 2014. “Introducing Buddhism and law.” In Buddhism and law: An introduction, edited by Rebecca French and Mark Nathan, 1–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139044134.002

Gurung, Kalsang Norbu. 2021. “Measuring income inequality in Tibetan society: Understanding the different amounts of offerings and the status of Tibetan officials.” Revue d’Etudes Tibétaines 57 (Janvier): 193–215. https://himalaya.socanth.cam.ac.uk/collections/journals/ret/pdf/ret_57_09.pdf

Hartley, Lauren R. 2002. “‘Inventing modernity’ in Amdo: Views on the role of traditional Tibetan culture in a developing society.” In Amdo Tibetans in transition: Society and culture in the post-Mao era, Toni Huber (ed), 1–26. Leiden: Brill.

Ium, Michael. 2022. “Tsongkhapa as a Mahasiddha: A Reevaluation of the Patronage of the Gelukpa in Tibet.” Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 45: 73-117.

Ium, Michael. 2023. “The Early History of Ganden Monastery and the Construction of the Geluk Tradition.” PhD diss., University of California, Santa Barbara.

Jansen, Berthe. 2018. The monastery rules: Buddhist monastic organization in pre-modern Tibet. Berkeley: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/luminos.56

———. 2021. “From sacred commodity to religio-economic conundrum: Tracing the Tibetan term dkor.” Revue d’Etudes Tibétaines 57: 162–192. https://himalaya.socanth.cam.ac.uk/collections/journals/ret/pdf/ret_57_08.pdf

———. 2023. “Tibetan Buddhist monastic constitutional law and governmental constitutional law: Mutual influences?” In Tom Ginsburg

and Benjamin Schonthal, eds. Buddhism and comparative constitutional law, 124–140. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009286022.009

Kilby, Christina A. 2015. “Epistolary Buddhism: Letter writing and the growth of Geluk Buddhism in early modern Asia.” PhD diss., University of Virginia.

Liyanarachchi Gregory, A. 2009. “Accounting in ancient Sri Lanka: Some evidence of the accounting and auditing practices of Buddhist monasteries during 815–1017 AD.” Accounting History 14(1–2): 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/1032373208098554

McLaughlin, Levi. 2019. Soka Gakkai’s human revolution: The rise of a mimetic nation in modern Japan. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.

McLaughlin, Levi, Aike P. Rots, Joylon Baraka Thomas, and Chika Watanabe. 2020. “Why scholars of religion must investigate the corporate form.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 88(3): 693–725. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfaa041

Miller, Beatrice, D. 1961. “The web of Tibetan monasticism.” Journal of Asian Studies 20(2): 197–203. https://doi.org/10.2307/2050483

Nietupski, Paul. 2011. Labrang monastery: A Tibetan Buddhist community on the Inner Asian borderlands, 1709–1958. Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books.

Porterfield, Amanda. 2018. Corporate spirit: Religion and the rise of the modern corporation. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199372652.001.0001

Schopen, Gregory. 2004. Buddhist monks and business matters: Still more papers on monastic Buddhism in India. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvvn22s

———. 2019. “The business model of a Buddhist monasticism: Acquiring productive assets.” Hualin International Journal of Buddhist Studies 2(2): 217–249. https://dx.doi.org/10.15239/hijbs.02.02.08

Schweiger, Peter. 2021. “Lenders and borrowers in Tibetan society.” Revue d’Etudes Tibétaines 57 (Janvier): 20–32. https://himalaya.socanth.cam.ac.uk/collections/journals/ret/pdf/ret_57_02.pdf

Shabkar Tsogdruk Rangdrol. 2001. The life of Shabkar. Trans. Matthieu Ricard and Padmakara Translation Group. Ithaca: Snow Lion Publications.

Stern, Philip J. 2017. “The corporation in history.” In The corporation: A critical, multidisciplinary handbook, edited by Gretje Baars and Andre Spicer, 21–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139681025.002

Sullivan, Brenton. 2021. Building a religious empire: Tibetan Buddhism, bureaucracy, and the rise of the Gelukpa. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812297676

Welker, Marina. 2017. “Articulating and disarticulating corporation and community.” In The corporation: A critical, multidisciplinary handbook, edited by Gretje Baars and Andre Spicer, 449–456. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139681025.032

Published

2024-10-30

How to Cite

Caple, J. (2024). Contemporary Tibetan Monastic Business and the Corporate Form. Implicit Religion, 25(3-4), 355–375. https://doi.org/10.1558/imre.27491