The Feeling of Believing
The Importance of Affectivity in the Rehabilitation of Belief
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/imre.24340Keywords:
Affectivity, Enactivism, Kevin Schilbrack, Power, belief, philosophy of religionAbstract
The last half-century of religious studies scholarship has seen the diminishing importance of belief as a concept of analysis. The putative inaccessibility of beliefs and the concept’s Western Christian provenance has led many scholars of religion to reject the concept. Recent years have seen attempts to rehabilitate the concept of belief, including Kevin Schilbrack’s 2014 Philosophy and the Study of Religions. Schilbrack proposes that by engaging with contemporary philosophical reflection on belief—specifically dispositionalist and interpretationist theories—the traditional critiques of belief can be overcome. The purpose of this paper is to further develop this approach by proposing an additional, currently overlooked, element of belief—its affectivity. This approach builds on current research from enactivist cognitive science and avoids the objections traditionally levelled at belief, while enabling a more sophisticated analysis of power dynamics in religion
References
Ahmed, Arif. 2020. “Belief and Religious ‘Belief’.” Religious Studies 56(1): 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412519000234
Asad, Talal. 1993. Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.
Bae, Bosco B. 2017. “Belief and Acceptance for the Study of Religion.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 29(1): 57–87. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341374
Bell, Catherine. 1992. Ritual Theory, Ritual Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Blum, Jason N. 2018. “Belief: Problems and Pseudo-Problems.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 86(3): 642–664. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfy001
Bransford, John D. and Marcia K. Johnson. 1972. “Contextual Prerequisites for Understanding: Some Investigations of Comprehension and Recall.” Journal of Visual Learning and Verbal Behaviour 11(6): 717–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80006-9
Burton, Robert A. 2008. On Being Certain: Believing You Are Right Even When You’re Not. New York: St Martin’s Press.
Colombetti, Giovanna. 2017. “Enactive Affectivity, Extended.” Topoi 36(3): 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-015-9335-2
Colombetti, Giovana and Tom Roberts. 2015. “Extending the Extended Mind: The Case for Extended Affectivity.” Philosophical Studies 172(5): 1243–1263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-014-0347-3
Colombetti, Giovanna and Evan Thompson. 2008. “The Feeling Body: Towards an Enactive Approach to Emotion.” In Developmental Perspectives on Embodiment and Consciousness, edited by W. F. Overton, U. Müller, and J. Newman, 45–68. New York: Erlbaum.
Damasio, Antonio. 2006. Descartes’ Error. Revised edition. London: Vintage Books.
Day, Abby. 2013. “Varieties of Belief over Time: Reflections from a Longitudinal Study of Youth and Belief.” Journal of Contemporary Religion 28(2): 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537903.2013.783339
De Jaegher, Hanne and Ezequiel Di Paolo. 2007. “Participatory Sense-Making: An Enactive Approach to Social Cognition.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6(4): 485–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-007-9076-9
de Sousa, Ronald. 2008. “Really, What Else Is There?: Emotions, Value and Morality.” Critical Quarterly 50(4): 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8705.2008.00852.x
Descartes, René. 1985. “The Passions of the Soul.” In The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Translated by John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff and Dugald Murdoch. Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805042
Di Paolo, Ezequiel. 2005. “Autopoiesis, Adaptivity, Teleology, Agency.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4(4): 429–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-005-9002-y
Duncan, Seth and Lisa Feldman Barrett. 2007. “Affect is a Form of Cognition: A Neurobiological Analysis.” Cognition and Emotion 21(6): 1184–1211.
Fernando, Mayanthi L. 2012. “Belief and/in the Law.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 24(1): 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006812X634520
Fitzgerald, Timothy. 2000. The Ideology of Religious Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gallagher, Shaun. 2005. How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199271941.001.0001
———. 2008. “Direct Perception in the Intersubjective Context.” Consciousness and Cognition 17(2): 535–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.003
Hahl, Oliver, Minjae Kim and Ezra W. Zuckerman Sivan. 2018. “The Authentic Appeal of of the Lying Demagogue: Proclaiming the Deeper Truth about Political Illegitimacy.” American Sociological Review 83(1): 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122417749632
Hume, David. 2007. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by Peter Millican. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/owc/9780199549900.001.0001
Kalmykova, Elena. 2019. “Holding Doctrinal Belief as an Artefact.” Religious Studies 57(2): 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412519000143
Krueger, Joel. 2021. “Enactivism, Other Minds, and Mental Disorders.” Synthese 198(suppl 1): 365–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02133-9
Kyselo, Miriam. 2014. “The Body Social: An Enactive Approach to the Self.” Frontiers in Psychology 5: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00986
Lincoln, Bruce. 2005. “Responsa Miniscula.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 17(1): 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1163/1570068053429884
———. 2006. Holy Terrors: Thinking about Religion after September 11. Second edition. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Lofton, Kathryn. 2012. “Introduction to the Yale Roundtable on Belief.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 24(1): 51–54. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006812X632874
Lopez Jr., Donald S. 1998. “Belief.” In Critical Terms for Religious Studies, edited by Mark C. Taylor, 21–35. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Maiese, Michelle. 2016. Embodied Selves and Divided Minds. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199689231.001.0001
Martin, Craig. 2017. “‘Yes, ... but ...’: The Neo-Perennialists.” 29(4–5): 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341396
Masuzawa, Tomoko. 2005. The Invention of World Religions. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226922621.001.0001
McCutcheon, Russell T. 2012. “I Have a Hunch.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 24(1): 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006812X632892
Miller, Daniel. 2022. “American Christian Nationalism and the Meaning of ‘Religion’.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 34(1–2): 64–85. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341533
Mitchell, Jon P. and Hildi J. Mitchell. 2008. “Embodiment and Immanence in Catholicism and Mormonism.” Social Analysis 52(1): 79–94. https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2008.520105
Newen, Albert, Leon De Bruin and Shaun Gallagher. 2018. “4E Cognition: Historical Roots, Key Concepts, and Central Issues.” In The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition, edited by Albert Newen, Shaun Gallagher, and Leon De Bruin, 3–16. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxford-hb/9780198735410.013.1
Nikkel, David. 2019. “A Theory of the Embodied Nature of Religion.” The Journal of Religion 99(2): 137–172. https://doi.org/10.1086/702240
Nussbaum, Martha. 2001. Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840715
Protevi, John. 2010. “Adding Deleuze to the Mix.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9: 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-010-9171-1
Rubenstein, Mary-Jane. 2012. “The Twilight of the Doxai: Or, How to Philosophize with a Whac-A-MoleTM Mallet.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 24(1): 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006812X634511
Ryle, Gilbert. 1949. The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson & Co.
Schaefer, Donovan. 2015. Religious Affects: Animality, Evolution, and Power. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822374909
———. 2022. Wild Experiment: Feeling Science and Secularism after Darwin. Durham, NC. Duke University Press.
Schilbrack, Kevin. 2014. Philosophy and the Study of Religions: A Manifesto. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
———. 2017. “The Place of Subjectivity in the Study of Religion: A Response to Craig Martin.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 29(4–5): 327–333. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341397
Schwitzgebel, Eric. 2002. “A Phenomenal, Dispositional Account of Belief.” Noûs 36(2): 249–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0068.00370
Sharf, Robert H. 1998. “Experience.” In Critical Terms for Religious Studies, edited by Mark C. Taylor, 94–116. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Shargel, Daniel and Jesse Prinz. 2018. “An Enavtivist Theory of Emotional Content.” In The Ontology of Emotions, edited by Hichem Naar and Fabrice Teroni, 110–129. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316275221.007
Smith, Jonathan Z. 1998. “Religion, Religions, Religious.” In Critical Terms for Religious Studies, edited by Mark C. Taylor, 269–284. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Smith, Wilfred Cantwell. 1977. Belief and History. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
Spinoza, Baruch de. 2009. The Ethics. Project Gutenberg. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/3800/3800-h/3800-h.htm
Thompson, Evan. 2007. Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Thompson, Evan and Diego Cosmelli. 2011. “Brain in a Vat or Body in a World?: Brainbound Versus Enactive Views of Experience.” Philosophical Topics 39(1): 163–180. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics201139119
Varela, Francisco J. 1991. “Organism: A Meshwork of Selfless Selves.” In Organism and the Origins of the Self, edited by Alfred I. Tauber, 79–107. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3406-4_5
Varela, Francisco J., Evan Thompson and Eleanor Rosch. 1991. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6730.001.0001
Ward, Dave, David Silverman and Mario Villalobos. 2017. “Introduction: The Varieties of Enaction.” Topoi 36(3): 365–375.
Weber, Andreas and Francisco J. Varela. 2002. “Life After Kant: Natural Purposes and the Autopoietic Foundations of Biological Individuality.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1(2): 97–125. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020368120174
Wynn, Mark. 2009. Faith and Place: An Essay in Embodied Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199560387.001.0001
———. 2018. “Aesthetic Goods and the Nature of Religious Understanding.” In New Models of Religious Understanding, edited by Fiona Ellis, 116–133. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
