Zombies Roaming Around the Pantheon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/imre.24338Keywords:
Belief, Cognition, Consciousness, Orthopraxy, Philosophical Zombies, Roman HistoryAbstract
The present contribution explores how the field of Roman History has formalized and justified the absence of “belief”—and religious belief in particular—as part of its standard research programme. In positing an unbridgeable gap between ancient Romans and modern human beings mainly based on the idea that “belief” and “faith” are modern Protestant concepts, Roman History inadvertently transmogrified its subjects of study into a legion of zombies incapable of holding meta-representations of their own religious (and non-religious) beliefs. While Roman History might have been an outlier in its staunch commitment to this exclusionary approach, the post-1970s move towards the abandonment of “belief” insofar as the study of ancient religion(s) is concerned was part of a widespread paradigm shift within the Humanities, which only very recently has been questioned. The history of the concept of “belief” in both Roman History and anthropology, as well as its rejection from the former’s disciplinary toolbox, are tackled, while the peculiar disciplinary concepts of Roman “orthopraxy” and “demythicization” (sometimes hailed as explananda or replacements for the absence of “belief” in Roman antiquity) are also explained. Finally, a cognitive rebuttal of this absence is provided through a reappraisal of David Chalmers’ “philosophical zombies” mental experiment.
References
Ambasciano, L. 2016. “Mind the (Unbridgeable) Gaps: A Cautionary Tale about Pseudoscientific Distortions and Scientific Misconceptions in the Study of Religion.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion (28)2: 141-225. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341372
———. 2017. “What Is Cognitive Historiography, Anyway? Method, Theory, and a Cross-Disciplinary Decalogue.” Journal of Cognitive Historiography 4(2): 136–150. https://doi.org/10.1558/jch.38759
———. 2019. An Unnatural History of Religions: Academia, Post-truth and the Quest for Scientific Knowledge. London and New York: Bloomsbury.
———. 2022. “Who is the Damiatrix? Roman Women, the Political Negotiation of Psychotropic Experiences, and the Cults of Bona Dea”. In Cognitive Approaches to Ancient Religious Experience, edited by E. Eidinow, A. W. Geertz, and J. North, 167–192. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ambasciano, L. and P. Pachis. 2017. “Strangers in a Strange Land No More: Introducing the Book Review Symposium section and Jennifer Larson’s Understanding Greek Religion (2016).” Journal of Cognitive Historiography 4(1): 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1558/jch.36257
Ando, C. 2009. “Evidence and Orthopraxy.” The Journal of Roman Studies 99: 171–181. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40599745
Barrett, J. L. and J. A. Lanman. 2008. “The Science of Religious Beliefs.” Religion 38(2): 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.religion.2008.01.007
Beard, M., J. North and S. Price. 1998. Religions of Rome. Volume 1: A History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beard, M. 2015. SPQR. A History of Ancient Rome. London: Profile Books.
Bettini, M. 2012. “Missing Cosmogonies: The Roman Case?” Archiv für Religionsgeschichte 13(1): 69-92. https://doi.org/10.1515/afgs.2012.69
Boyer, P. 2000. “Functional Origins of Religious Concepts: Conceptual and Strategic Selection in Evolved Minds.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 6(2): 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.00012
Bowden, H. 2022. “A Cognitive Approach to Ancient Greek Animal Sacrifice.” In Cognitive Approaches to Ancient Religious Experience, edited by E. Eidinow, A. W. Geertz and J. North, 19–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brandt, T. and D. Huppert. 2021. “Brain Beats Heart: A Cross-cultural Reflection.” Brain 144(6): 1617–1620. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awab080
Bultmann, R. 1953. Kerygma and Myth: A Theological Debate. Edited by H. W. Bartsch. Transl. by R. H. Fuller. London: SPCK. Originally published in 1951 as volume 1 of Kerygma und Mythos. Ein theologisches Gespräch. Hamburg: Herbert Reich Evangelischer Verlag.
Caldwell-Harris, C., C. F. Murphy, T. Velazquez and P. P. McNamara. 2011. “Religious Belief Systems of Persons with High Functioning Autism.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 33. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6zh3j3pr [Last Accessed 15 July 2022].
Chalmers, D. J. 1995. “Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 2(3): 200–219.
———. 2014. “How Do You Explain Consciousness?” TED Talks, March. https://www.ted.com/talks/david_chalmers_how_do_you_explain_consciousness/transcript [Last Accessed 15 July 2022].
Chalmers, D. J. and K. J. McQueen. 2022. “Consciousness and the Collapse of the Wave Function.” In Consciousness and Quantum Mechanics, edited by S. Gao, 11–63. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chalupa, A. 2010. “Why Did Greeks and Romans Pray Aloud? Anthropomorphism, Dumb Gods and Human Cognition.” In Chasing Down Religion. In the Sights of History and the Cognitive Sciences: Essays in Honor of Luther H. Martin, edited by P. Pachis and D. Wiebe, 69–78. Sheffield: Equinox.
Coleman, T. J., K. Sevinç, R. W. Hood Jr. and J. Jong. 2019. “An Atheist Perspective on Self-Esteem and Meaning Making while under Death Awareness.” Secular Studies 1(2): 204–228. https://doi.org/10.1163/25892525-00102002
Crivellato, E. and D. Ribatti. 2007. “Soul, Mind, Brain: Greek Philosophy and the Birth of Neuroscience.” Brain Research Bulletin 71(4): 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2006.09.020
Cumont, F. 1906. Les religions orientales dans le paganisme romaine. Paris: Leroux.
Davies, J. P. 2011. “Believing the Evidence.” In Evidence, Inference and Enquiry. Proceedings of the British Academy 171, edited by P. Dawid, W. Twining and M. Vasilaki, 395–434. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De Sanctis, G. 2021. Roma prima di Roma. Miti e fondazioni della città eterna. Rome: Salerno.
De Waal, F. 2016. Are We Smart Enough to Know How Smart Animals Are? London: Granta.
Dennett, D. C. 2013. Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking. London: Penguin.
Dunbar, R. 2014. Human Evolution. London: Penguin.
Eidinow, E., A. W. Geertz, and J. North, eds. 2022. Cognitive Approaches to Ancient Religious Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Frith, C. D. 2012. “The Role of Metacognition in Human Social Interactions.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 367(1599): 2213–2223. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0123
Gabba, E. 1996. Dionigi e la storia di Roma arcaica. Bari: Edipuglia. Originally published in 1991 as Dionysius and the History of Ancient Rome. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Geertz, A. W. 2013. “Whence Religion? How the Brain Constructs the World and What This Might Tell Us about the Origins of Religion, Cognition and Culture.” In Origins of Religion, Cognition and Culture, edited by A. W. Geertz, 17–70. London: Routledge.
Gordon, R., A. P. Lyons and H. D. Lyons. 2011. Fifty Key Anthropologists. London: Routledge.
Gregory, R. L. 1997. Eye and Brain: The Psychology of Seeing. Fifth Edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hublin, J.-J., A. Ben-Ncer, S. E. Bailey, S. E. Freidline, S. Neubauer, M. M. Skinner, I. Bergmann, A. Le Cabec, S. Benazzi, K. Harvati and P. Gunz. 2017. “New Fossils from Jebel Irhoud, Morocco and the Pan-African Origin of Homo sapiens.” Nature 546(7657): 289–292. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22336
Jablonka, E. and S. Ginsburg. 2021. The Evolution of the Sensitive Soul: Learning and the Origins of Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Jacob, P. 2019. “Intentionality.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2019 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/intentionality/ [Last accessed 15 July 2022].
Jardine, N. 2004. “Etics and Emics (Not to Mention Anemics and Emetics) in the History of the Sciences.” History of Science 42(3): 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/007327530404200301
Johnston, S. I., ed. 2004. Religions of the Ancient World: A Guide. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
King, C. W. 2020. The Ancient Roman Afterlife: Di Manes, Beliefs, and the Cult of the Dead. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Kirk, R. 2021. “Zombies.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2021 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/zombies/ [Last Accessed 15 July 2022].
Koryat, A. 2007. “Metacognition and Consciousness.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Consciousness, edited by P. D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch and E. Thompson, 289–325. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816789.012
Larson, J. 2016. Understanding Greek Religion. London: Routledge.
Lincoln, B. 1998. “Dumézil, Ideology, and the Indo-Europeans.” Zeitschrift fur Religionswissenschaft 6(2): 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1515/0029.221
López Austin, A. 2004 [1980]. Cuerpo humano e ideología: las concepciones de los antiguos Nahuas. Volume 1. Ciudad de México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México/Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas.
Mackey, J. L. 2022. Belief and Cult: Rethinking Roman Religion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Majid, A. 2012. “A Guide to Stimulus-Based Elicitation for Semantic Categories.” In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Fieldwork, edited by N. Thieberger, 54–71. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McDonald, A. 2020. “Emotions.” In UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology, edited by A. Austin and W. Wendrich. University of California Los Angeles. http://digital2.library.ucla.edu/viewItem.do?ark=21198/zz002kj9sj [Last Accessed 15 July 2022].
Miller, J. L., ed. 2013. Royal Hittite Instructions and Related Administrative Texts. Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature.
Minois, G. 1998. Histoire de l’athéisme. Paris: Fayard.
Mommsen, T. 1862–1866. The History of Rome (4 vols., trans. W. P. Dickson). London: R. Bentley and Son. Originally published in 1854–1856 as Römische Geschichte [3 vols.], Leipzig: Weidmann.
Needham, R. 1972. Belief, Language, and Experience. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press/Oxford: Blackwell & Mott.
———. 1990. Review of Veyne, P. 1988. Did the Greeks Believe in Their Myths? An Essay on the Constitutive Imagination. Translated by P. Wissing. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. Man. New Series 25(1): 157–158. https://doi.org/10.2307/2804131
Nock, A. D. 1934. “Religious Developments from the Close of the Republic to the Death of Nero.” In The Cambridge Ancient History. Vol. 10, edited by S. A. Cook, 465–511. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nummenmaa, L., E. Glerean, R. Hari and J. K. Hietanen. 2013. “Bodily Maps of Emotions.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(2): 646–651. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1321664111
Oxford Dictionary 2022. “Hangry.” UK Dictionary, Oxford University Press. https://www.lexico.com/definition/hangry [Last accessed 22 June 2022].
Pigliucci, M. 2013. “What Hard Problem?” Philosophy Now 99. https://philpapers.org/archive/PIGWHP.pdf [Last Accessed 15 July 2022].
Price, S.R.F. 1984. Rituals and Power: The Roman Imperial Cult in Asia Minor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Robertson, D. 2011. The Philosophy of Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy (CBT): Stoic Philosophy as Rational and Cognitive Psychotherapy. London: Karnac Books.
Riggs, C. 2010. “Body.” In UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology, edited by Elizabeth Frood and Willeke Wendrich. University of California Los Angeles. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8f21r7sj
Rüpke, J. 2018. Pantheon: A New History of Roman Religion. Translated by David M. B. Richardson. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Originally published in 2016 as Pantheon. München: Verlag C. H. Beck.
Rutherford, I. 2020. Hittite Texts and Greek Religion: Contact, Interaction, and Comparison. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Saler, B. 1974. Review of Needham, Rodney. 1972. Belief, Language, and Experience. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press/Oxford: Blackwell and Mott. American Anthropologist 76(4): 861–866. https://www.jstor.org/stable/674317
Segal, R. A. 2004. Myth: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scheid, J. 2004. “Religions in Contact.” In Religions of the Ancient World: A Guide, edited by S. I. Johnston, 112–126. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
———. 2005. Quand faire c’est croire. Les rites sacrificiels des Romains. Paris: Flammarion.
Smith, J. Z. 1987. To Take Place: Toward Theory in Ritual. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Spiro, M. 1966. “Religion: Problems of Definition and Explanation.” In Anthropological Approaches to the Study of Religion, edited by M. Banton, 85–126. London: Tavistock.
Stavrakopoulou, F. 2021. God: An Anatomy. London: Picador-MacMillan.
Swami, V., S. Hochstöger, E. Kargl and S. Stieger. 2022. “Hangry in the Field: An Experience Sampling Study on the Impact of Hunger on Anger, Irritability, and Affect.” PLoS ONE 17(7): e0269629. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269629
Turcan, R. 2000. The Gods of Ancient Rome: Religion in Everyday Life from Archaic to Imperial Times. Transl. by A. Neville. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Originally published in 1998 as Les Dieux de Rome. Paris: Hachette Littératures.
Young, E., A. Ananthaswamy and D. Robson. 2021. “Consciousness Expanded.” New Scientist 3342: 34–41.
Watts, G. and S. Mosurinjohn. 2022. “Can Critical Religion Play by Its Own Rules? Why There Must Be More Ways to Be ‘Critical’ in the Study of Religion.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 90(2): 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfac045
White, C. 2021. An Introduction to the Cognitive Science of Religion: Connecting Evolution, Brain, Cognition, and Culture. London: Routledge.
Whitmarsh, T. 2016. Battling the Gods: Atheism in the Ancient World. London: Faber & Faber.
Wiebe, D. 2016. “Claims for a Plurality of Knowledge in the Comparative Study of Religions.” In Contemporary Views on Comparative Religion in Celebration of Tim Jensen’s 65th Birthday, edited by P. Antes, A. W. Geertz and M. Rothstein, 181–192. Sheffield: Equinox.
Wilson, N. G., ed. 2003. Pietro Bembo. Oratio pro litteris graecis. Quaderni di filologia medievale e umanistica, 5. Messina: Centro Interdipartimentale di Studi Umanistici.
