Is There Such a Thing as Religious Belief?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/imre.24309Keywords:
Brian Clack, empiricism, religious belief, Ludwig WittgensteinAbstract
Whether there is such a thing as religious belief has been queried by philosophers who think the attitudes that get called religious beliefs are radically different from standard types of belief. It is sometimes claimed that so-called religious beliefs are, for example, resistant to experiential evidence in ways that genuine types of belief are not. A recent proponent of this contention, Brian Clack (2016), has argued that the lack of connection between religious attitudes and the world of everyday experience entails that these attitudes should be classified as “belief-like imaginings” rather than as bona fide beliefs. While admitting that contentions such as this prompt useful reflection upon the specificities of religious belief, I argue that the view that what are ordinarily called religious beliefs are not really beliefs amounts to an unwarranted linguistic stipulation. The concept of belief has a diversity of applications rather than being restricted to the narrow subset which dubious empiricist assumptions might lead us to privilege.
References
“The Apostles’ Creed.” 1970. In Prayers We Have in Common: Agreed Liturgical Texts Proposed by the International Consultation on English Texts, 9–10. London: Chapman.
Austin, J. L. 1975. How to Do Things with Words, 2nd edition, edited by J. O. Urmson and Marina Sbisà. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bivins, Jason C. 2012. “Ubiquity Scorned: Belief’s Strange Survivals.” Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 24(1): 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006812X632883
Blackburn, Simon. 2005. Truth: A Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clack, Brian R. 2016. “Wittgenstein and the Peculiarities of Religious ‘Belief’.” In Wittgenstein and Normative Inquiry, edited by Mark Bevir and Andrius Gališanka, 192–216. Leiden: Brill.
Currie, Gregory, and Ian Ravenscroft. 2002. Recreative Minds: Imagination in Philosophy and Psychology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Davidson, Donald. 1975. “Thought and Talk.” In Mind and Language, edited by Samuel D. Guttenplan, 7–23. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 1982. “Rational Animals.” Dialectica 36(4): 317–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.1982.tb01546.x
Diamond, Cora. 1991. “Realism and the Realistic Spirit.” In her The Realistic Spirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind, 39–72. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
———. 1996. “Wittgenstein, Mathematics, and Ethics: Resisting the Attractions of Realism.” In The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein, edited by Hans Sluga and David G. Stern, 226–260. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Glock, Hans-Johann. 2010. “Can Animals Judge?” Dialectica 64(1): 11–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.2010.01227.x
Heiphetz, Larisa, Casey Lee Landers and Neil Van Leeuwen. 2021. “Does ‘Think’ Mean the Same Thing as ‘Believe’? Linguistic Insights into Religious Cognition.” Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 13(3): 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000238
Jenson, J. Christopher. 2016. “The Belief Illusion.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67(4): 965–995. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1093/bjps/axv006
Lash, Nicholas. 1992. Believing Three Ways in One God: A Reading of the Apostles’ Creed. London: SCM Press.
Leach, Edmund. 1967. “Virgin Birth.” Proceedings of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Northern Ireland for 1966: 39–49. https://doi.org/10.2307/3031713
Lewis, C. S. 1966 [1961]. A Grief Observed. London: Faber and Faber.
Lincoln, Bruce. 2003. Holy Terrors: Thinking about Religion after September 11. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lopez Jr, Donald S. 1998. “Belief.” In Critical Terms for Religious Studies, edited by Mark C. Taylor, 21–35. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
MacIntosh, J. J. 1994. “Belief-In Revisited: A Reply to Williams.” Religious Studies 30(4): 487–503. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500023131
Misak, C. J. 1995. Verificationism: Its History and Prospects. London: Routledge.
Needham, Rodney. 1972. Belief, Language, and Experience. Oxford: Blackwell.
Orsi, Robert A. 1996. Thank You, St. Jude: Women’s Devotion to the Patron Saint of Hopeless Causes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Price, H. H. 1965. “Belief ‘In’ and Belief ‘That’.” Religious Studies 1(1): 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500002304
Rees, Frank D. 2001. Wrestling with Doubt: Theological Reflections on the Journey of Faith. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press.
Routley, Richard. 1981. “Alleged Problems in Attributing Beliefs, and Intentionality, to Animals.” Inquiry 24(4): 385–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201748108601945
Ryan, Sharon. 2010. “Doxastic Voluntarism.” In A Companion to Epistemology, 2nd ed., edited by Jonathan Dancy, Ernest Sosa and Matthias Steup, 322–325. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Schilbrack, Kevin. 2014. Philosophy and the Study of Religions: A Manifesto. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Smith, Wilfred Cantwell. 1979. Faith and Belief. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Van Leeuwen, Neil. 2014. “Religious Credence Is Not Factual Belief.” Cognition 133(3): 698–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.015
———. 2017. “Do Religious ‘Beliefs’ Respond to Evidence?” Philosophical Explorations 20(S1): S52–S72. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13869795.2017.1287294
Van Leeuwen, Neil, Kara Weisman and Tanya Marie Luhrmann. 2021. “To Believe Is Not to Think: A Cross-Cultural Finding.” Open Mind: Discoveries in Cognitive Science 5: 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00044
Williams, Bernard. 1973. “Deciding to Believe.” In his Problems of the Self: Philosophical Papers, 1956–1972, 136–151. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1958. Philosophical Investigations, translated by G. E. M. Anscombe, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
———. 1966. Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief, edited by Cyril Barrett. Oxford: Blackwell.
———. 1978. Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics, edited by G. H. von Wright, R. Rhees and G. E. M. Anscombe, translated by G. E. M. Anscombe, 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
———. 1979. Remarks on Frazer’s “Golden Bough,” edited by Rush Rhees, translated by A. C. Miles, revised by Rush Rhees. Retford: Brynmill.
———. 1993. “Remarks on Frazer’s Golden Bough.” In Philosophical Occasions, 1912–1951, edited by James C. Klagge and Alfred Nordmann, 115–155. Indianapolis: Hackett.
———. 1998. Culture and Value: A Selection from the Posthumous Remains, edited by Georg Henrik von Wright and Heikki Nyman, revised by Alois Pichler, translated by Peter Winch. Oxford: Blackwell.
———. 2009. Philosophical Investigations, translated by G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker and Joachim Schulte, 4th ed. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
