Dilemmas with Disciplinary Hierarchies and Ideals of Scientific Research in the Study of Religion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/imre.23314Keywords:
scientificity, scientific study of religion, comparative religion, interdisciplinarityAbstract
While strictly conceptual matters have dominated much of the discussion concerning religion as an object of scientific research, different understandings of the scientific character of the study of religion have also always had a significant role in the scholarly self-understanding. Here two significant conceptualizations of this scientific character—that of the so-called new scientificity (as advocated mostly by scholars from the cognitive science of religion) as well as that of the comparative history of religion—are described in detail and then thoroughly analyzed and criticized. It will be shown how both conceptualizations face problems, but those of the new scientificity are significantly more serious. Lastly, some more general reflections will be offered concerning the significance of these matters for the study of religion overall.
References
Ambasciano, Leonardo. 2020. An Unnatural History of Religions: Academia, Post-truth and the Quest for Scientific Knowledge. London: Bloomsbury.
Anttonen, Veikko. 2016. “Theories as Borders: Sites of Entry and Exit in Comparative Religion.” In Contemporary Views on Comparative Religion: In Celebration of Tim Jensen’s 65th Birthday, edited by Peter Antes, Armin W. Geertz, and Mikael Rothstein, 165–178. Sheffield: Equinox.
Asad, Talal. 1983. “Anthropological Conceptions of Religion: Reflections on Geertz.” Man 18(2): 237–259. https://doi.org/10.2307/2801433
Barrett, Justin L. 1999. “Theological Correctness: Cognitive Constraint and the Study of Religion.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 11(4): 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006899X00078
———. 2011. “Cognitive Science of Religion: Looking Back, Looking Forward.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 50(2): 229–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2011.01564.
Bering, Jesse M. 2011. The Belief Instinct: The Psychology of Souls. New York: WW Norton & Company.
Bulbulia, Joseph. 2007. “The Evolution of Religion.” In Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, edited by Robin Dunbar and Louise Barrett, 622–635. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2013. “The Arts Transform the Cognitive Science of Religion.” Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion 1(2): 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1558/jcsr.v1i2.141
Bulbulia, Joseph, and Edward Slingerland. 2012. “Religious Studies as a Life Science.” Numen 59(5–6): 564–613. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685276-12341240
Bulbulia, Joseph, Marc Stewart Wilson, and Chris G. Sibley. 2014. “Thin and Thinner: Hypothesis-Driven Research and the Study of Humans.” Numen 61(2–3): 166–181. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685276-12341314.
Cho, Francisca, and Richard K. Squier. 2008. “‘He Blinded Me With Science’: Science Chauvinism in the Study of Religion.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 76 (2): 420–448.
Cleland, Carol E. 2001. “Historical Science, Experimental Science, and the Scientific Method.” Geology 29(11): 987–990.
———. 2002. “Methodological and Epistemic Differences between Historical Science and Experimental Science.” Philosophy of Science 69(3): 474–496. https://doi.org/10.1086/342455
Dubuisson, Daniel. 2016. “Critical Thinking and Comparative Analysis in Religious Studies.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 28(1): 26–30. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341349
Engler, Steven. 2004. “Constructionism versus What?” Religion 34(4): 291–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.religion.2004.09.001
Fitzgerald, Timothy. 1997. “A Critique of ‘Religion’ as a Cross-Cultural Category.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 9(2): 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006897X00070
———. 2000. The Ideology of Religious Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Franek, Juraj. 2021. Naturalism and Protectionism in the Study of Religion. London: Bloomsbury.
Gardiner, Mark Quentin, and Steven Engler. 2010. “Charting the Map Metaphor in Theories of Religion.” Religion 40(1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.religion.2009.08.010
Geertz, Armin W. 1999. “Definition as Analytical Strategy in the Study of Religion.” Historical Reflections/Reflexions Historiques, 445–475.
Gelders, Raf, and S. N. Balagangadhara. 2011. “Rethinking Orientalism: Colonialism and the Study of Indian Traditions.” History of Religions 51(2): 101–128. https://doi.org/10.1086/660928
Gilhus, Ingvild Saelid. 2011. “Hermeneutics.” In The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in the Study of Religion, edited by Michael Stausberg and Steven Engler, 275–284. New York: Routledge.
Gothóni, René. 2011. Words Matter: Hermeneutics in the Study of Religions. Bern: Peter Lang.
Halvorson, Hans. 2016. “Why Methodological Naturalism?” In The Blackwell Companion to Naturalism, edited by Kelly James Clark, 136–149. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118657775.ch10
Hanegraaff, Wouter J. 1995. “Empirical Method in the Study of Esotericism.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 7(2): 99–129. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006895X00342
James, E. O. 1954. “The History, Science and Comparative Study of Religion.” Numen 1(2): 91–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/3269469
Jensen, Jeppe Sinding. 1993. “Is a Phenomenology of Religion Possible? On the Ideas of a Human and Social Science of Religion.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 5(2): 109–133. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006893X00092
———. 2001. “Universals, General Terms and the Comparative Study of Religion.” Numen 48(3): 238–266. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852701752245550
———. 2009. “Conceptual Models in the Study of Religion.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Religion, edited by Peter B. Clarke, 245–262. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2011. “Epistemology.” In The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in the Study of Religion, edited by Michael Stausberg and Steven Engler, 40–53. New York: Routledge.
———. 2016. “History of Religions Without an Object? Comparing Theoretical Objects in the History of Religions and in Anthropology.” In Contemporary Views on Comparative Religion: In Celebration of Tim Jensen’s 65th Birthday, edited by Peter Antes, Armin W. Geertz, and Mikael Rothstein, 103–114. Sheffield, Bristol.
Johnson, Dominic D. P. 2005. “God’s Punishment and Public Goods: A Test of the Supernatural Punishment Hypothesis in 186 World Cultures.” Human Nature 16(4): 410–446.
Josephson, Jason Ananda. 2011. “The Invention of Japanese Religions.” Religion Compass 5(10): 589–597.
Joy, Morny. 2000. “Beyond Essence and Intuition: A Reconsideration of Understanding in Religious Studies.” In Secular Theories on Religion: Current Perspectives, edited by Tim Jensen and Mikael Rothstein, 69–86. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.
King, Richard. 1999. “Orientalism and the Modern Myth of ‘Hinduism.’” Numen 46(2): 146–185. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568527991517950
Kippenberg, Hans Gerhard. 1984. “Introduction: Symbols of Conflicts.” In Struggles of Gods: Papers of the Groningen Work Group for the Study of the History of Religions, edited by Hendrik Jan Willem Drijvers, Yme Kuiper, and Hans Gerhard Kippenberg, 1–6. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Lawson, E. Thomas, and Robert N. McCauley. 1990. Rethinking Religion: Connecting Cognition and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lease, Gary. 2000. “Follow the Genes: Religion as a Survival Strategy.” In Secular Theories on Religion: Current Perspectives, edited by Mikael Rothstein and Tim Jensen, 107–116. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.
Long, Charles H. 1978. “Human Centers: An Essay on Method in the History of Religions.” Soundings 61(3): 400–414.
———. 1985. “A Look at the Chicago Tradition in the History of Religions: Retrospect and Future.” In The History of Religions: Retrospect and Prospect, edited by Joseph M. Kitagawa, 87–104. New York: Macmillan.
Lopez, Donald S. Jr. 1998. “Belief.” In Critical Terms for Religious Studies, edited by Mark C. Taylor, 21–35. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Martin, Luther H. 2008. “The Uses (and Abuse) of the Cognitive Sciences for the Study of Religion.” CSSR Bulletin 37(4): 95–98.
———. 2012. “The Future of the Past: The History of Religions and Cognitive Historiography.” Religio 2: 155–171.
Martin, Luther H., and Ilkka Pyysiäinen. 2014. “Moving towards a New Science of Religion; or, Have We Already Arrived?” In Mental Culture: Classical Social Theory and the Cognitive Science of Religion, edited by Dimitris Xygalatas and William W. McCorkle Jr, 213–226. London, New York: Routledge.
Martin, Luther H., and Donald Wiebe. 2012a. “Religious Studies as a Scientific Discipline: The Persistence of a Delusion.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 80(3): 587–597. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfs030
———. 2012b. “Why the Possible Is Not Impossible but Is Unlikely: A Response to Our Colleagues.” Religio 20(1): 63–72.
———. 2013. “The Scientific Study of Religion: Two Case Studies, One Response.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 25(4–5): 478–485. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341310
McCauley, Robert N. 2014. “Explanatory Pluralism and the Cognitive Science of Religion: Why Scholars in Religious Studies Should Stop Worrying about Reductionism.” In Mental Culture: Classical Social Theory and the Cognitive Science of Religion, edited by Dimitris Xygalatas and William W. McCorkle Jr, 11–32. London: Routledge.
McCorkle, William W., and Dimitris Xygalatas. 2012. “Past, Present, and Future in the Scientific Study of Religion: Introduction.” Religio 2: 149–154.
———. 2014. “Social Minds, Mental Cultures—Weaving Together Cognition and Culture in the Study of Religion.” In Mental Culture: Classical Social Theory and the Cognitive Science of Religion, edited by Dimitris Xygalatas and William W. McCorkle, 1–10. London, New York: Routledge.
McCutcheon, Russell T. 2017. “Afterword: Feast and Famine in the Study of Religion.” In Theory in a Time of Excess: Beyond Reflection and Explanation in Religious Studies Scholarship, edited by Aaron W. Hughes, 191–202. Sheffield: Equinox.
Molendijk, Arie L. 2005. The Emergence of the Science of Religion in the Netherlands. Leiden: Brill.
Müller, Max. 1882. Introduction to the Science of Religion: Four Lectures Delivered at the Royal Institution in February and May, 1870. Oxford: Longmans, Green.
Müller, Max. 1895. Chips from a German Workshop. Volume 1: Essays on the Science of Religion. New York: Charles Schribner’s sons.
Norenzayan, Ara. 2015. “Big Questions about Big Gods: Response and Discussion.” Religion, Brain & Behavior 5(4): 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2014.928359
Peedu, Indrek. 2018. “What Game Are We Playing?: A New Look at the Identity and Beginning of the Study of Religion.” Numen 65(1): 88–108. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685276-12341488
Pummer, Reinhard. 1972. „Religionswissenschaft or Religiology?“ Numen 19 (Fasc. 2/3): 91–127. https://doi.org/10.2307/3269740
Pyysiäinen, Ilkka. 2004. Magic, Miracles, and Religion: A Scientist’s Perspective. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.
Rudolph, Kurt. 1981. “Basic Positions of Religionswissenschaft.” Religion 11(2): 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-721X(81)80011-5
Schilbrack, Kevin. 2010. “Religions: Are There Any?” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 78(4): 1112–1138. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfq086
———. 2012. “The Social Construction of ‘Religion’ and Its Limits: A Critical Reading of Timothy Fitzgerald.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 24(2): 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006812X634872
Seiwert, Hubert. 2012. “The Study of Religion as a Scientific Discipline: A Comment on Luther Martin and Donald Wiebe’s Paper.” Religio 20(1): 27–38.
———. 2020. “Theory of Religion and Historical Research. A Critical Realist Perspective on the Study of Religion as an Empirical Discipline.” Zeitschrift für Religionswissenschaft 28(2): 207–236. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfr-2020-0001
Sharpe, Eric J. 1986. Comparative Religion: A History. London: Duckworth.
Slingerland, Edward. 2008. “Response to Cho and Squier.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 76(2): 449–454. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfn002
———. 2014. “Toward a Second Wave of Consilience in the Cognitive Scientific Study of Religion.” Journal of Cognitive Historiography 1(1): 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1558/jch.v1i1.121
Slingerland, Edward, and Joseph Bulbulia. 2011. “Introductory Essay: Evolutionary Science and the Study of Religion.” Religion 41(3): 307–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2011.604513
Smart, Ninian. 1973. The Science of Religion and the Sociology of Knowledge: Some Methodological Questions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Smith, Jonathan Z. 1996. “A Matter of Class: Taxonomies of Religion.” Harvard Theological Review 89(4): 387–403. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017816000006118
———. 1998. “Religion, Religions, Religious.” In Critical Terms for Religious Studies, edited by Mark C. Taylor, 269–284. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Sørensen, Jesper. 2005. “Religion in Mind: A Review Article of the Cognitive Science of Religion.” Numen 52(4): 465–494. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852705775219974
Sosis, Richard. 2019. “Why Cultural Evolutionary Models of Religion Need a Systemic Approach.” In Evolution, Cognition, and the History of Religion: A New Synthesis, edited by Anders Klostergaard Petersen, Ingvild Sælid Gilhus, Luther H. Martin, Jeppe Sinding Jensen, and Jesper Sørensen, 45–61. Leiden: Brill.
———. 2020. “Four Advantages of a Systemic Approach to the Study of Religion.” Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 42(1): 142–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0084672420905019
Stausberg, Michael, and Steven Engler. 2011. “Introduction: Research Methods in the Study of Religions.” In The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in the Study of Religion, edited by Michael Stausberg and Steven Engler, 3–20. New York: Routledge.
Taves, Ann. 2012. “A Response to Martin and Wiebe.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 80(3): 601–604. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfs032
Tworuschka, Udo. 2015. Einführung in die Geschichte der Religionswissenschaft. Darmstadt: WBG, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Valk, Ülo. 2017. “‘Religion’: On the Concept and Its Uses.” Forum for Anthropology and Culture 13: 108–112.
Waardenburg, Jacques. 1997. “The Emergence of Science of Religion: Explanatory Theory and Hermeneutics.” Religio 5(2): 107–116.
Wach, Joachim. 1967. “The Meaning and Task of the History of Religions.” In The History of Religions: Essays on the Problem of Understanding, edited by Joseph M. Kitagawa, Mircea Eliade, and Charles H. Long, 1–19. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
———. 1988. Introduction to the History of Religions. London: Macmillan.
Whitehouse, Harvey. 2004. “Modes of Religiosity and the Cognitive Science of Religion.” Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 16(3): 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1163/1570068042652310
Wiebe, Donald. 1984. “The Failure of Nerve in the Academic Study of Religion.” Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses 13(4): 401–422.
———. 1997. “Dissolving Rationality: The Anti-Science Phenomenon and Its Implications for the Study of Religion.” In Rationality and the Study of Religion, edited by Jeppe Sinding Jensen and Luther H. Martin, 167–183. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
———. 2000. “‘Why the Academic Study of Religon?’ Motive and Method in the Study of Religion.” In Secular Theories on Religion: Current Perspectives, edited by Tim Jensen and Mikael Rothstein, 261–280. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.
———. 2012. “It’s Never Been Better: Comments on the Current State of the Science of Religion.” Religio, 173–192.
Wierzbicka, Anna. 2010. Experience, Evidence, and Sense. The Hidden Cultural Legacy of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2011. “Defining ‘the humanities’.” Culture & Psychology 17(1): 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X10388841
Wildman, Wesley J., Richard Sosis, and Patrick McNamara. 2012. “The Politics of Field Names.” Religion, Brain & Behavior 2(2): 101–104.
Wilson, David Sloan. 2005. “Testing Major Evolutionary Hypotheses about Religion with a Random Sample.” Human Nature 16(4): 382–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-005-1016-1
Xygalatas, Dimitris. 2010. “Can the Study of Religion Be Scientific?” In Chasing Down Religion: In the Sights of History and the Cognitive Sciences, edited by Panayotis Pachis and Donald Wiebe, 459–471. Sheffield: Equinox.
Xygalatas, Dimitris, and William McCorkle, eds. 2014. Mental Culture: Classical Social Theory and the Cognitive Science of Religion. London: Routledge.
