Toward a Study of ‘Scientologies’
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/imre.41879Keywords:
Scientology, scientologies, Free Zone, New ReligionsAbstract
Scientology, the New Religious Movement founded by L. Ron Hubbard in the 1950s, is currently experiencing growing levels of interest from the academic community. Recent scholarly publications point to an array of academic approaches to Scientology, in addition to potential avenues for future research. In this reflective article, the author proposes that studies of contemporary Scientology would be enriched by a greater emphasis on the notion of ‘Scientologies’ (different types of Scientology across both Church of Scientology and Free Zone spaces). This approach, which addresses a wider scope of the Scientologist landscape, can benefit from the increasing number of researchers studying Scientology, and raises the potential for cross-collaboration across a network of interdisciplinary scholars. To this end, the author considers recent developments in the academic study of Scientology, and how a focus on ‘Scientologies’ can enable scholars to explore the complexities of increasingly diverse Scientologist communities.
References
Chryssides, George D. 2017. ‘Changing Your Story: Assessing Ex-Member Narratives.’ http://www.religiousstudiesproject.com/podcast/changing-your-story-assessing-ex-member-narratives/
Cotter, Christopher R., and David G. Robertson. 2016. ‘Introduction: The World Religions Paradigm in Contemporary Religious Studies.’ In After World Religions: Reconstructing Religious Studies, edited by Christopher R. Cotter and David G. Robertson, 1–20. Milton Park, UK: Routledge.
Donovan, Peter. 1999. ‘Neutrality in Religious Studies.’ In The Insider/Outsider Problem in the Study of Religion: A Reader, edited by R T McCutcheon, 235–247. London: Cassell.
Gregg, Stephen E. and George D. Chryssides. 2017. ‘‘The Silent Majority?’ Understanding Apostate Testimony Beyond ‘Insider / Outsider’ Binaries in the Study of New Religions.’ In Visioning New and Minority Religions: Projecting the Future, edited by E. V. Gallagher, 20–32. Milton Park, UK: Routledge.
Gregg, Stephen E. and Aled J. Ll. Thomas. 2019. ‘Scientology Inside Out: Complex Religious Belonging in the Church of Scientology and the Free Zone.’ In The Insider/Outsider Debate: New Perspectives in the Study of Religion, edited by George D Chryssides and Stephen E Gregg, 350–370. Sheffield: Equinox.
Hellesøy, Kjersti. 2016. ‘Scientology Schismatics.’ In Handbook of Scientology, edited by James R. Lewis and Kjersti Hellesøy, 448–461. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004330542_021
Jolly, Don. 2016. ‘Sexuality in Three Ex-Scientology Narratives.’ In Handbook of Scientology, edited by James R. Lewis and Kjersti Hellesøy, 411–420. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004330542_019
Lewis, James R. 2013. ‘Free Zone Scientology and Other Movement Milieus: A Preliminary Characterization.’ Temenos: Nordic Journal of Comparative Religion 49(2):255–276. https://doi.org/10.33356/temenos.8203
———. 2016. ‘The Dror Center Schism, The Cook Letter and Scientology’s Legitimation Crisis.’ In Handbook of Scientology, edited by James R Lewis and K Hellesøy, 462–484. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004330542_022
Lewis, James R. and Kjersti Hellesøy, eds. 2016. Handbook of Scientology. Leiden: Brill.
Rothstein, M. 2009. ‘‘His Name was Xenu. He Used Renegades…,’ Aspects of Scientology’s Founding Myth.’ In Scientology, edited by James R. Lewis, 365–387. Oxford : Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331493.003.0020
Schorey, Shannon T. 2016. ‘‘LRH4ALL!’: The Negotiation of Information in the Church of Scientology and the Open Source Scientology Movement.’ In Handbook of Scientology, edited by James R. Lewis and Kjersti Hellesøy, 341–359. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004330542_015
Thomas, Aled J. Ll. Forthcoming: 2021. Free Zone Scientology: Contesting the Boundaries of a New Religion. London: Bloomsbury.
Westbrook, Donald A. 2019. Among the Scientologists: History, Theology, and Praxis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190664978.001.0001
