The Relevance of Fitzgerald’s Critical Approach to the Study of Religions in Asia

Authors

  • Ilaria Vecchi Leeds Trinity University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/imre.41105

Keywords:

Fitzgerald, critical religion, ideology, Japan, Itako, visual anthropology

Abstract

During my doctoral research, I looked at a specific type of medium who lives in the north of Japan. Although many of these figures are categorised as religious, the activity and role they cover in their communities goes beyond the “religious” function. In light of this consideration, I became interested in the use of the term religion, as its application in this context limited the capacity to understand these mediums. As I began questioning the category of religion, I was introduced by my supervisor to The Ideology of Religious Studies by Fitzgerald. The book quickly became a relevant source to understand the development of the discourse on the study of religion and in my specific region of research: Asia, and more specifically, Japan. Since then, I have applied his critical approach to the study of religion to my methodology of research, coupling it with visual ethnographic methods, “giving a body” to Fitzgerald’s observations in his critique of religion in Asia. This paper will explore the use of the critical religion approach in the analysis of the use of the concept in Japan and, more specifically, in the study of the Itako mediums of Nord Tohoku. This work will also be related to the visual ethnographic work moulded on the critique of religion as conceived by Fitzgerald.

References

Banks, Marcus and Ruby, Jay. 2011. Made to Be Seen: Perspectives on the History of Visual Anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226036632.001.0001

Connor, Linda; Ash, Patsy and Ash, Timothy (eds). 1983. Jero Tapakan: Balinese Healer. An Ethnographic Film Monograph. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Dutton, Edwin. 2010. “Anthropology-Lite: An Education Perspective on the Ideology of Religious Studies.” Religion & Education 37(2): 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/15507394.2010.486368

Eliade, M. 1964. Shamanism, Archaic Techniques of Ecstasy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Fanon, Franz. 1967. Black Skin, White Mask. New York: Grove.

Fitzgerald, Timothy. 2000. The Ideology of Religious Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Goulet, Nicole. 2011. “Postcolonialism and the Study of Religion: Dissecting Orientalism, Nationalism, and Gender Using Postcolonial Theory.” Religion Compass 5(10): 631–637. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8171.2011.00306.x

Isomae, Jinichi. 2012. “The Conceptual Formation of The Category “Religion” in Modern Japan: Religion, State, Shinto.” Journal of Religion in Japan 1: 226–245. https://doi.org/10.1163/22118349-12341236

Ivy, Merilyn. 1995. Discourses of the Vanishing: Modernity, Phantasm, Japan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226388342.001.0001

Liu, David. 2015. “The Ancestral, The Religiopolitical.” In Religion as a Category of Governance and Sovereignty, edited by Trevor Stack, Naomi Goldenberg, and Timothy Fitzgerald, 143–181. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004290594_008

Parliament of Italy. 2012 [1948]. Articolo 7. La Constituzione. Rome: Senato della Republica. https://www.senato.it/1025?sezione=118&articolo_numero_articolo=7

Pink, Sarah. 2013. Doing Visual Ethnography. London: Sage.

Vecchi, Ilaria. 2019. “Itako on the Screen: The Use of Visual Ethnography for Understanding How These Japanese Shamans are Adapting to Modern Japan”. Journal of British Association for the Study of Religions 21: 79–91. https://doi.org/10.18792/jbasr.v21i0.41

Published

2020-08-04

How to Cite

Vecchi, I. (2020). The Relevance of Fitzgerald’s Critical Approach to the Study of Religions in Asia. Implicit Religion, 22(3-4), 429–438. https://doi.org/10.1558/imre.41105