Critical Thinking Begins at Home
On Making a Shift in the Study of Religion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/imre.41110Keywords:
critical religion, internationalization, professionalization, University of AlabamAbstract
Using as the starting point experiences gained at the University of Alabama, this paper discusses the context and goals of developing and implementing what Tim Fitzgerald and others have called a critical study of religion program (both undergraduate and graduate) within a modern research university – an initiative that played a key role in our department’s successful reinvention, one that has been taking place over the past twenty years.
References
Bayart, Jean-François 2005 [1996]. The Illusion of Cultural Identity. Translated by Steven Rendall, Janet Roitman, Cynthia Schoch, and Jonathan Derrick. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Coward, Harold, Eva Dargyay, and Ron Neufeldt eds. 1988. Readings in Eastern Religions. Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
Dubuisson, Daniel. 2007. The Western Construction of Religion: Myths, Knowledge, and Ideology. Translated by William Sayers. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
———. 2019. The Invention of Religions. Translated by Martha Cunningham. Sheffield,: Equinox.
Fish, Stanley. 1982. Is There a Text in this Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fitzgerald, Timothy. 1990. “Hinduism and the World Religions Fallacy.” Religion 20(2): 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-721X(90)90099-R
———. 2000. The Ideology of Religious Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———, ed. 2007. Religion and the Secular: Historical and Colonial Formations. Sheffield: Equinox.
Jordan, Louis Henry. 1905. Comparative Religion: Its Genesis and Growth. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.
———. 1908. “Comparative religion: Its method and scope: A paper read (in part) at the third international congress of the history of religions, Oxford, September 17, 1908.” Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Krech, Volkhard. 2020. “Relational Religion: Manifesto for a Synthesis in the Study of Religion.” Religion 50(1): 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2019.1686847
Lessa, William A. and Evon Z. Vogt, eds. 1979. Reader in Comparative Religion: An Anthropological Approach. Fourth edition. New York: HarperCollins.
Martin, Craig. 2019. “‘The Thing Itself Always Steals Away’: Scholars and the Constitution of Their Objects.” In Constructing “Data” in Religious Studies: The Architecture of the Academy, edited by Leslie Dorrough Smith, 151–174. Sheffield: Equinox.
McCutcheon, Russell T. 1997. Manufacturing Religion: The Discourse on Sui Generis Religion and the Politics of Nostalgia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2003. The Discipline of Religion: Structure, Meaning, Rhetoric. Abingdon: Routledge.
———. 2015. “Afterword: Reinventing the Study of Religion in Alabama.” In Writing Religion: The Case for the Critical Study of Religion, edited by Steven W. Ramey, 208–222. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
———. 2016a. “A Baker’s Dozen of Choices in the Introductory Class.” Forum: Crafting the Introductory Course in Religious Studies (plus four responses). Teaching Theology & Religion 19(1): 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/teth.12323
———. 2016b. “Growth, Identity, and Branding in the Department of Religious Studies at the University of Alabama.” Religious Studies Review. 24 March. http://rsn.aarweb.org/articles/growth-identity-and-branding-department-religious-studies-university-alabama
———. 2018a. Fabricating Religion: Fanfare for the common e.g. Berlin: de Gruyter.
———. 2018b. Studying Religion: An Introduction. Second edition. Abingdon: Routledge.
———. 2019. “The Enduring Presence of our Pre-critical Past or, Same as it ever was, Same as it ever was…” Paper presented to the November 2019 San Diego annual meeting of the North American Association for the Study of Religion (NAASR).
———. 2020. “Learning to Code: Digital Pebbles and Institutional Ripples.” Accepted for publication in Introduction to Digital Humanities: Research Methods in the Study of Religion, edited by Christopher Cantwell & Kristian Petersen. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Ramey, Steven W., ed. 2015. Writing Religion: The Case for the Critical Study of Religion. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
Richards, I. A. 1929. Practical Criticism: A Study of Literary Judgment. New York: Harcourt Brace.
Schmeiser, Peggy. 2019. “Governance and Public Policy as Critical Objects of Investigation in the Study of Religion.” In Constructing “Data” in Religious Studies: Examining the Architecture of the Academy, edited by Leslie Dorrough Smith, 127–135. Sheffield: Equinox.
Smart, Ninian and Richard Hecht. 1982. Sacred Texts of the World: A Universal Anthology. New York: Crossroad. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-05927-0
Smith, Jonathan Z. Imagining Religion: From Babylon to Jonestown. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
———. 1990. Drudgery Divine: On the Comparison of Early Christianities and the Religions of Late Antiquity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Smith, Wilfred Cantwell. 1963. The Meaning and End of Religion: A New Approach to the Religious Traditions of Mankind. New York: Macmillan.
Staal, Frits. 1979. “The Meaninglessness of Ritual.” Numen 26(1): 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852779X00244
