The End of Religious Studies (as we knew it)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/imre.41526Keywords:
religious studies, phenomenology, realism, critical religionAbstract
Fitzgerald’s The Ideology of Religious Studies was published the year before I started my Master’s degree at the University of Edinburgh and was brought to my attention by James Cox, my supervisor. It led me to question everything I had learned as a Religious Studies undergraduate and sparked my first essay (in 2001), titled “Religious Studies: What is it?” In it, I had seen the problem of “what is it?” as a methodological issue as well as a definitional one and predicted an expansion of Religious Studies along phenomenological lines. Today, while still recognising colleagues’ fears that Fitzgerald’s book undermines the study of religion, I rather see his critique as making the study of religion more important than ever, though not in the way I had described in my 2001 essay. My paper will revisit those early responses to the book (mine and others’), asking if we are indeed seeing the end of Religious Studies (as we knew it), and show how Fitzgerald’s critique has instead opened up and transformed the study of religion, at least in my own research and teaching.
References
llen, Charlotte. 1996. “Is nothing sacred? Casting Out the Gods from Religious Studies.” Lingua Franca 6(7): 30–40.
Arnal, William E. 2000. “Definition.” In Guide to the Study of Religion, edited by Willi Braun and Russell T. McCutcheon, 21–34. London: Cassell.
Brennan, Zoe. 2010. “Pagans are on the march – but are they harmless eccentrics or a dangerous cult?” The Daily Mail. 12 November. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1328968/Pagans-march--harmless-eccentrics-dangerous-cult.html
Cotter, Christopher R. 2020. The Critical Study of Non-Religion. London: Bloomsbury.
Fitzgerald, Timothy. 1999. “The Ideology of Religious Studies.” Council of Societies for the Study of Religion Bulletin 28(2): 39–41.
Fitzgerald, Timothy. 2000. The Ideology of Religious Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fitzgerald, Timothy. 2007. Discourse on Civility and Barbarity: A Critical History of Religion and Related Categories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2007b. “Introduction.” In Timothy Fitzgerald, ed. Religion and the Secular: Historical and Colonial Formations, 1–24. Sheffield: Equinox.
———. 2013. “A response to Kevin Schilbrack.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 25: 101–101. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-12341256
Goldenberg, Naomi. 2019. “‘Religion’ and its Limits – Reflections on Discursive Borders and Boundaries.” Journal of the British Association for the Study of Religions 21 and Journal of the Irish Society for the Academic Study of Religions. Special Edition: Borders and Boundaries: “Religion” on the Periphery 7: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.18792/jbasr.v21i0.37
Griffiths, Paul J. 2000. “The Very Idea of Religion.” First Things May: 30–35.
Long, Jeffrey D. 2001. “The Ideology of Religious Studies. Timothy Fitzgerald.” Book Review. The Journal of Religion 81(3): 494–496. https://doi.org/10.1086/490912
McCutcheon, Russell T. 1997. Manufacturing Religion: The Discourse on Sui generis Religion and the Politics of Nostalgia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2000. “A Brief Response from a Fortunate Man.” Culture and Religion 1(1): 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/01438300008567147
———. 2001. Critics Not Caretakers: Redescribing the Public Study of Religion. Albany: State University of New York Press.
———. 2018. “Religion” in Theory and Practice: Demystifying the Field for Burgeoning Academics. Sheffield: Equinox.
Owen, Suzanne. 2008. The Appropriation of Native American Spirituality. London: Continuum.
———. 2018. “The Problem with Paganism in Charity Registration in England and Wales.” Implicit Religion 21(3): 271–284. https://doi.org/10.1558/imre.38296
Owen, Suzanne and Teemu Taira. 2015. “The Category of ‘Religion’ in Public Classification: Charity Registration of The Druid Network in England and Wales.” In Religion as a Category of Governance and Sovereignty, edited by Trevor Stack, Naomi Goldenberg, and Timothy Fitzgerald 90–114. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004290594_006
Paper, Jordan. 1991. “Religious Studies: Time to Move from a Eurocentric Bias?” In Religious Studies: Issues, Prospects and Proposals, edited by Klaus K. Klostermaier and Larry W. Hurtado, 73–84. Atlanta, GA: Scholars.
Pye, Michael. 1991. “Religious Studies in Europe.” In Religious Studies: Issues, Prospects and Proposals, edited by Klaus K. Klostermaier and Larry W. Hurtado, 39–56. Atlanta, GA: Scholars.
Robertson, David G. 2016. UFOs, Conspiracy Theories and the New Age Millennial Conspiracism. London: Bloomsbury.
Said, Edward W. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon.
Saler, Benson. 2001. “The Ideology of Religious Studies: Some Reflections on Fitzgerald’s thesis.” Religious Studies Review 27(2): 103–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-0922.2001.tb00367.x
Schilbrack, Kevin. 2012. “The Social Construction of ‘Religion’ and Its Limits A Critical Reading of Timothy Fitzgerald.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 24: 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006812X634872
———. 2013. “After We Deconstruct ‘Religion,’ Then What? A Case for Critical Realism.” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 25: 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006812X634872
Smith, Jonathan Z. 1998. “Religion, Religions, Religious.” In Critical Terms for Religious Studies, edited by Mark C. Taylor, 269–284. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Strenski, Ivan. 1998. “On ‘Religion’ and Its Despisers.” In What is Religion? Origins, Definitions, and Explanations, edited by Thomas A. Idinopulos and Brian C. Wilson, 113–132. Leiden: Brill.
van der Leeuw, Gerardus. 1963. Religion in Essence and Manifestation. New York: Harper & Row.
