Should a Decent Society become Liberal?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/imre.32605Keywords:
Rawls, The Law of Peoples, Liberalism, Decent societies, IranAbstract
In a particular view, John Rawls’ theory has two components. First is “Political Liberalism” which applies to western societies that over the past centuries have established a democratic structure and adhere to the rule of law. However, this theory is not a “comprehensive conception” and not for every society, but it is associated with them in the second component of Rawls’ theory. This is presented in The Law of Peoples. In this book Rawls elaborates his theory regarding societies which lack a democratic heritage, yet are regarded as “Decent Societies” and have the potential to become liberal societies. In his view, by accepting a non-liberal societies into the Society of People, the non-liberal society will be encouraged to become liberal. In this article we consider the theory proposed in The Law of Peoples with reference to Iranian society.
References
Chukwudi Eze, Emmanuel. 1997. Race and the Enlightenment: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.
Dabashi, Hamid. 1378 [1999]. “Naghdi bar nazarieh libralism John Rawls” [A review of John Rawls’ theory of liberalism]. Kian 48: 44?51.
Davari Ardekani, Reza. 1988 [2009]. John Rawls, Nzarieh edalat [A Theory of Justice], translated by M. Bohrani and S. M. K.Sarvarian. Tehran: Pajoheshkadeh motleat farhangi va ejtemaei.
Hollenbach, David. 1994. “Public Reason/Private Religion? A Response to Paul J. Weithman.” The Journal of Religious Ethics 22(1): 3?28.
Rawls, John. 1995. Libéralisme politique, Translated by C. Audard, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
———. 2002. The Law of Peoples: with The Idea of Public Reason Revisited. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———. 2005. A Theory of Justice: Original Edition. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
———. 2005b. Political Liberalism: Expanded Edition. New York: Columbia University Press.
Salbi, Zainab. 2015. Four Simple Reasons for the Ongoing Divide between Sunni and Shia Muslims. https://womenintheworld.com/2015/06/17/4-simple-reasons-for-the-ongoing-divide-between-sunni-and-shia-muslims/
Sandel, Michael J. 1984. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Soroush, Abdulkarim. 1374 [1995]. “Ma’na va mabna-e secularism” [Meaning and Foundation of Secularism]. Kian 26: 4?13.
———. 1386 [2007]. Militant Secularism. http://www.drsoroush.com/English/On_DrSoroush/E-CMO-2007-Militant%20Secularism.html
———. 1385 [2006]. Farbehtar az ideology [Bigger than ideology]. Tehran: Serat.
Vaezi, Ahmad. 1386 [2007]. John Rawls; az nazariyeh edalat ta liberalism siyasi [John Rawls: From a Theory of Justice to Political Liberalism]. Qom: Bustan ketab. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198717133.013.38
———. 1386 [2007a]. “Edalat dar goftgo ba Ahmad Vaezi.” [Justice, Interview with Ahmad Vaezi]. Hamshahri. www.hamshahrionline.ir/news/32073/
Vaezi, Ahmad. 1388 [2009]. Naghd va barresi nazariyehae edalat [Review and Evaluation of Theories of Justice]. Qom: Moasseseh amouzeshi va pajoheshi Imam Khomeini.
Weithman, Paul J. 1994. “Rawlsian Liberalism and the Privatization of Religion: Three Theological Objections Considered.” The Journal of Religious Ethics. 22 (1): 3?28. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316551646.004
