Implicit Beliefs, Explicit Practices?

How International Human Rights Law Manages Religion

Authors

  • Helge Årsheim University of Oslo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/imre.37955

Keywords:

implicit religion, lived religion, religious freedom, human rights, European Court of Human Rights

Abstract

In this article, I discuss how international human rights law (IHRL) interacts with the notions of "implicit" and "lived" religion. More specifically, I examine the capability of Article 9 on the freedom of thought, conscience and religion in the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) to provide protection for rights claims that derive from "implicit" and "lived" forms of religion. I develop this argument in three steps: First, I provide a working definition of "implicit" and "lived" religion. Second, I assess the provisions on the freedom of thought, conscience and religion in the ECHR, asking what kinds of "religion" are most likely to gain protections under this instrument. Third, I review some recent cases to come before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), which monitors the ECHR, gauging which forms of religion have been recognized by the court.

Author Biography

Helge Årsheim, University of Oslo

Helge Årsheim, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

References

Agrama, Hussein Ali. 2010. “Secularism, Sovereignty, Indeterminacy: Is Egypt a Secular or a Religious State?” Comparative Studies in Society and History 52(3): 495–523. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0010417510000289

Ammerman, Nancy T. 2016. “Lived Religion as an Emerging Field: An Assessment of Its Contours and Frontiers.” Nordic Journal of Religion and Society 29(2): 83–99. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1890-7008-2016-02-01

Årsheim, Helge and Pamela Slotte. 2017. “The Juridification of Religion?” Brill Research Perspectives on Law and Religion 1(2): 1–89. https://doi.org/10.1163/24682993-12340002

Bailey, Edward. 1990. “The Implicit Religion of Contemporary Society: Some Studies and Reflections.” Social Compass 37(4): 483–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/003776890037004006

———. 2009. “Implicit Religion.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Religion, edited by Peter B. Clarke, 801–815. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199279791.003.0045

Beaman, Lori. 2012. “Is Religious Freedom Impossible in Canada?” Law, Culture and the Humanities 8(2): 266–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/1743872110366653

Bhuta, N. 2014. “Two Concepts of Religious Freedom in the European Court of Human Rights.” South Atlantic Quarterly 113 (1): 9–35. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-2390410

Danchin, Peter G. 2011. “Islam in the Secular Nomos of the European Court of Human Rights.” Michigan Journal of International Law 32: 663–747.

Davis, Murray S. 1986. “‘That’s Classic!’ The Phenomenology and Rhetoric of Successful Social Theories.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 16(3): 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/004839318601600301

Dressler, Markus. 2008. “Religio-Secular Metamorphoses: The Re-Making of Turkish Alevism.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 76 (2): 280–311. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfn033

Gorski, Philip S. 2000. “Historicizing the Secularization Debate: Church, State, and Society in Late Medieval and Early Modern Europe ca. 1300 to 1700.” American Sociological Review 65(1): 138–167. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657295

Gorski, Philip S. and Ate? Alt?nordu. 2008. “After Secularization?” Annual Review of Sociology 34(1): 55–85. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134740

Hanson, Sharon. 2007. “The Sacred Paradox of English Law.” Implicit Religion 10(1): 8–37.

Hurd, Elizabeth Shakman. 2015. Beyond Religious Freedom: The New Global Politics of Religion. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsr.12754

Itzcovich, G. 2013. “One, None and One Hundred Thousand Margins of Appreciations: The Lautsi Case.” Human Rights Law Review 13(2): 287–308. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngs038

Martínez-Torrón, Javier. 2018. “Strasbourg’ s Approach to Religion in the Pluralist Democracies of Europe.” In Magna Carta, Religion and the Rule of Law, edited by R. Griffith-Jones and M. Hill, 281–300. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316178164.017

McIvor, Méadhbh. 2015. “Carnal Exhibitions: Material Religion and the European Court of Human Rights.” Ecclesiastical Law Journal 17(1): 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0956618x14000866

Pelkmans, Mathijs. 2014. “Paradoxes of Religious Freedom and Repression in (Post-) Soviet Contexts.” Journal of Law and Religion 29 (3): 436–446. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2014.23

Su, Anna. 2016. “Judging Religious Sincerity.” Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 5(1): 28–48.

Sullivan, Winnifred Fallers. 2005. The Impossibility of Religious Freedom. Oxford: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0009640700101805

Taylor, Paul M. 2005. Freedom of Religion: UN and European Human Rights Law and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Published

2019-05-08

How to Cite

Årsheim, H. (2019). Implicit Beliefs, Explicit Practices? How International Human Rights Law Manages Religion. Implicit Religion, 21(3), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1558/imre.37955

Issue

Section

Articles