Religious Freedom in Global Context

Authors

  • Jessica Giles The Open University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/imre.38617

Keywords:

human rights, religious freedom, universalism, theological rationale

Abstract

This article examines the concept of universalism as it relates to the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion (FoRB). To this end it explores the extent to which the refinement of the jurisprudence surrounding FoRB in Western Liberal democracies may threaten the conceptualisation of religious freedom as a universal right, when compared to the understanding of the concept outside Western contexts. Having identified a gap between Western and other contexts, it questions whether FoRB can still be considered, aspirationally at least, as a universal fundamental right. It considers whether the more recent international religious freedom accords stemming from the Muslim world provide the tools to bolster a core understanding of FoRB such that its claim to universalism might be supported on an ongoing basis.

Author Biography

Jessica Giles, The Open University

Jessica Giles, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.

References

Ahdar, R. and Leigh I. 2005. Religious Freedom in the Liberal State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Aid to the Church in Need. 2018. Global Religious Freedom in the World Report: https://acninternational.org/special-reports/acns-global-religious-freedom-in-the-world-report/

Annicchino, P. 2014. “Coherence (and Constistency) or Organised Hypocrisy? Religious Freedom in the Law of the European Union”, in Foblets, M-C; Alidadi, Katayoun; Nielsen, Jørgen S and; Yanasmayan, Zeynep (eds). 2014. Belief, Law and Politics, What Future for a Secular Europe? Farnham: Ashgate. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0956618x17000102

Bakhshizadeh M. 2018. “An Analysis of the Possibility of Fulfilling Gender Equality Within the Legal System of the Islamic Republic of Iran.” In Law, Religion and Tradition, edited by J. Giles, A. Pin, and F. S. Ravitch. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96749-3_3

Bali, A. U. and Lerner, H. eds. 2017. Constitution Writing, Religion and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Beirut Declaration. 2017. “Faith for Rights.” 28–29 March. Beirut, Lebanon. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Press/21451/BeirutDeclarationonFaithforRights.pdf

Bielefeldt, H., Ghanea N. and Wiener, M. 2016. Freedom of Religion or Belief. An International Law Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor. n.d. IRF Report and Countries of Particular Concern. https://www.state.gov/j/drl/irf/c13003.htm

———. 2017. International Religious Freedom Report. https://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/irf/religiousfreedom/index.htm#wrapper

Bussey, B. 2018. “Trinity Western University v. The Law Society of Upper Canada: 2018 SCC 33.” Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 7(3): 570–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwy048

Cairo Declaration on Human Rights. 1990. 5 August. https://www.fmreview.org/sites/fmr/files/FMRdownloads/en/FMRpdfs/Human-Rights/cairo.pdf

Chaplin, J. 2011. Herman Dooyeweerd. Christian Philosopher of State and Civil Society. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press. https://doi.org/10.1163/22116117-90000533

Cochran, R. and Calo, Z. 2017. Agape, Justice and Law: How might Christian love shape law? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316796931

D’Costa, G. Evans, M. Modood, T. and Rivers, J. 2013. Religion in a Liberal State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Decimo, L. 2016. “‘Inclusive Citizenship’: the necessity to establish an interfaith dialogue in modern Islamic Society.” In The Marrackech Declaration. A Bridge to Religious Freedom in Muslim Countries? edited by Fuccillo, Antonio, 73–88. Napoli, Italy: Scientifica.

Doe, N. 2011. Law and Religion in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Durham, W. C. Jr. and Scharffs, B. 2018. Law and Religion. National, International and Comparative Perspectives. Second Edition. Aspen Case book series. New York: Wolters Kluwer Legal Education.

Durham, W. C. Jr. and Thayer, D., eds. 2019. Religion, Pluralism and Reconciling Difference. Abingdon: Routledge.

European Court of Human Rights. 2017. ECHR Overview 1959–2017 . https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Overview_19592017_ENG.pdf

———. 2018. Guide to Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Freedom of thought conscience and religion. https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Guide_Art_9_ENG.pdf

Fiss J. and Getgen Kestenbaum J. 2017. “Respecting Rights? Measuring the World’s Blasphemy Laws” https://www.uscirf.gov/news-room/press-releases/uscirf-releases-report-measuring-blasphemy-laws-compliance-human-rights

Finnis, J. 2011. Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ghanea, N. Women and Religious Freedom: Synergies and Opportunities.

https://www.uscirf.gov/reports-briefs/special-reports/women-and-religious-freedom-synergies-and-opportunities

Garahan, S. 2016. “A right to Discrinimate? Widening the Scope for Interference with Religious Rights in Ebrahimian v France”. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 5(2): 352–358. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rww009

George, R. P. 1999. In Defense of Natural Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Giles, J. 2017. “A Hoped-for Coherent and Permissive Religious Freedom Policy: the Bougnaoui and Achbita Cases” PILARs CC 1: http://law-school.open.ac.uk/research/research-clusters/law-and-religion/case-comments

Giles, J. 2018a. “Neutrality in the Business Sphere – An Encroachment on Rights Protection and State Sovereignty”. Ox J Law Religion 7(2): 339–346. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwy026

———. 2018b. “Tradition as a Peacebuilding Tool.” In Law, Religion and Tradition, edited by J. Giles, A. Pin, and F. S. Ravtich, 153–191. Berlin: Springer.

Glenn, P. H. 2014. Legal Traditions of the World, Sustainable Diversity in Law. Fifth Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Government of the United States of America. 2018. Helsinki Commission Report. 2018. 6 February. https://www.csce.gov/sites/helsinkicommission.house.gov/files/Religious%20Freedom%20in%20the%20NSS%20Design%20Final_0.pdf

Hauerwas, S. 2015 “How to Think Theologically about Rights,” Journal of Law and Religion 30(3): 402–413. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2015.28

Human Rights Report Centre. 2015. Keeping the Faith. A Study of Freedom of Thought, Conscience, and Religion in ASEAN. http://hrrca.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Book-of-Keeping-the-Faith_web.pdf

Inoguchi, T. and Newman, E. 1997. “‘Asian values’ and democracy in Asia.” First Shizuoka Asia-Pacfici Forum. Jamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan. http://www.unu.edu/unupress/asian-values.html

Khong, C.O. 1997. “Asian values: the debate revisited.” First Shizuoka Asia-Pacfici Forum. Jamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan. http://www.unu.edu/unupress/asian-values.html

Künkler, M., Lerner, H. and Shankar, S. 2016. “Constitutionalism in Rough Seas. Balancing Religious Accommodation and Human Rights in, through, and despite, the Law.” American Behavioral Scientist 60(8): 911–918. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764216643806

Lerner, H. 2011. Making Constitutions in Deeply Divided Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8129.2012.00557_7.x

Marrakech Declaration. 2016. “The Rights of Religious Miniroties in Predominantly Muslim Communities: Legal Framework and a Call to Action.” 25–27 January. Marrakech, Morocco. http://www.marrakeshdeclaration.org/marrakesh-declaration.html

McIlroy, D. 2009. A Trinitarian Theology of Law: in conversation with Jürgen Moltmann, O’Donovan and Thomas Aquinas. Eugene, Oregon. Wipf & Stock. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9418.2009.00523.x

McCrudden, C. 2015. “Benedict’s Legacy: Human Rights, Human Dignity and the Possibility of Dialogue.” In Pope Benedict IV’s Legal Thought: A Dialogue on the Foundation of Law, edited by M. Cartabia and A. Simoncini, 165–184. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316106303.012

Marshall, P. 2002. God and the Constitution. Christianity and American Politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Open doors. 2019. “Paying the Price Twice: How Religious Persecution Exacerbates the Vulnerabilities of Marginalised Groups.” World Watch List Report. https://www.opendoorsuk.org/persecution/resources/wwl-advocacy-report-2019.pdf

Pew Research Centre. 2016. Pew-Templeton Global Religious Future Project: Explore the Data. http://www.globalreligiousfutures.org/explorer#/?subtopic=15&chartType=pie&year=2010&data_type=number&religious_affiliation=all&destination=to&countries=Worldwide&age_group=all&gender=all&pdfMode=false

———. 2018. Key Findings on the Global Rise in Religious Restrictions. Factank News in Numbers. 21 June. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/06/21/key-findings-on-the-global-rise-in-religious-restrictions/

Philippe, P. 2017. Religion and the EU’s External Policies. Increasing Engagement: In-depth Analysis. European Parliamentary Research Service. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_IDA%282017%29614612

Pin, A. 2014. “Religion, National Identities, and the Universality of Human Rights”. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 3(3): 419–439. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwu038

Putnam, R. D. and D. E. Campbell. 2010. American Grace. How Religion Divides and Unites Us. New York: Simon & Schuster. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381612000771

Qureshi, M.A. 2018. “The Blasphemy Laws of Pakistan: Experimenting with History and Tradition.” In Law, Religion and Tradition, edited by J. Giles, A. Pin, and F. S. Ravitch, 29–42. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96749-3_2

Reed, E. 2013. Theology for International Law. London and New York: Bloomsbury and T&T Clark.

Robbers, G. ed. 2019. Encyclopedia of Law and Religion Online. Leiden: Brill. https://referenceworks.brillonline.com/browse/encyclopedia-of-law-and-religion

Sandberg, R. 2012. Law and Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sen, A. 1997. “Human rights and Asian values”. The New Republic. 14–21 July.

https://www.scribd.com/document/245530276/Human-Rights-and-Asian-Values-pdf

Stopler, G. 2003. “Countenancing the Oppression of Women: How Liberals Tolerate Religious and Cultural Practices that Discriminate Against Women.” Columbia Journal of Gender and Law 12(154): 154–221.

Swiss Federal Constitution. 2000. Bern: The Swiss Parliament. https://www.parlament.ch/en/über-das-parlament/how-does-the-swiss-parliament-work/Rules-governing-parliamentary-procedures/federal-constitution

United Nations. 2015. Report of the Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief. Human Rights Council. Thirty-First Session. Agenda item 3. http://ap.ohchr.org/documents/dpage_e.aspx?si=A/HRC/31/18

United Nations. 2016. Religion and Religious Freedom in International Diplomacy Workshop. Summary Brief 22. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Religion/WorkshopReligion.pdf

United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees UK. 2018. Figures at a Glance. 19 June. http://www.unhcr.org/uk/figures-at-a-glance.html

United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner. 2013. Between Free Speech and Hate Speech: The Rabat Plan of Action, A Practical Tool to Combat Incitement of Hatred. 21 February. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/TheRabatPlanofAction.aspx

United Nations Office on Genocide Prevention and the Responsibility to Protect. 2017 [2015]. The Fez Process and the Fez Plan of Action on the Role of Religious Leaders in Preventing Incitement to Violence that Could Lead to Atrocity Crimes. http://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/Plan%20of%20Action%20Advanced%20Copy.pdf

United States Commission on International Religious Freedom. 2018. Annual Report Key findings and Recommendations. https://www.uscirf.gov/sites/default/files/USCIRF2018AnnualReport_abb_wlinks.pdf

Valcke, C. 2018. Comparing Law: Comparative Law as Reconstruction of Collective Commitments Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108555852

Vanoni, L. P. and Ragone, G. 2018. “From the Secularisation Theory to the Pluralistic Approach: Reconciling Religious Traditions and Modernity in Italian Case-Law.” In Law, Religion and Tradition, edited by J. Giles, A. Pin, and F. S. Ravtich. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96749-3_1

Watkins, D. and M. Burton, eds. 2018. Research Methods in Law. Second Edition. Routledge: Abingdon.

Witte, J. 2007. The Reformation of Rights: Law, Religion and Human Rights in Early Modern Calvinism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511819377

Weiler, J. 2017. “Je Suis Achbita”. European Journal of International Law 28(4): 989–1018.

Published

2019-05-08

How to Cite

Giles, J. (2019). Religious Freedom in Global Context. Implicit Religion, 21(3), 239–270. https://doi.org/10.1558/imre.38617

Issue

Section

Articles