Commentary on A. P. A. Broeders (1999) ‘Some observations on the use of probability scales in forensic identification’, Forensic Linguistics 6(2): 228–41

Authors

  • Christophe Champod The Forensic Science Service
  • Ian W. Evett The Forensic Science Service

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v7i2.239

Abstract

We thank Ton Broeders for inviting us to comment on the question of whether or not forensic experts should draw conclusions about the probability (or certainty) of a hypothesis. We cannot over-emphasize the importance of carefully considering this issue because the terminology used to describe the strength of evidence is intimately connected with the logical structure of forensic inference.

Published

2000-08-19

Issue

Section

Commentaries/Responses

How to Cite

Champod, C., & Evett, I. W. (2000). Commentary on A. P. A. Broeders (1999) ‘Some observations on the use of probability scales in forensic identification’, Forensic Linguistics 6(2): 228–41. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 7(2), 239-243. https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v7i2.239