‘She called me a name that I didn’t like’
Remorse, responsibility and rehabilitation in Winston Moseley’s parole hearings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.24219Keywords:
parole hearings, apologies, corpus, transitivity, Kitty GenoveseAbstract
In parole hearings, prison inmates are questioned to ascertain whether they can be considered rehabilitated and return to the community or whether they still pose a danger and should remain incarcerated. As such, parole hearings are complex discursive events in which the prisoner must negotiate their identity in conversation with parole officers. The data for this study comprises 17 transcripts of the parole hearings of Winston Moseley, one of the longest-serving inmates in the state of New York. The analysis aims to highlight how Moseley represents his responsibility in the crimes he committed, how he expresses remorse, insight and apologies, and how he portrays his rehabilitated self. The study shows that, even though Moseley’s focus is on the change and development of his personality, the linguistic strategies he uses to talk about his responsibility and how he expresses remorse remain obscure.
References
Ainsworth, J. (2008) You have the right to remain silent… but only if you ask for it just so. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 15(1): 1–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v15i1.1
Alexander, M. (2011) The new Jim Crow. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 9: 7–26.
Alper, M. (2016) By the numbers: parole release and revocation across 50 states. Retrieved from https://robinainstitute.umn.edu/sites/robinainstitute.umn.edu/files/2022-02/parole_by_the_numbers_updated.pdf
Anthony, L. (2022) AntConc. Waseda University. Retrieved from https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software/antconc/
Atkinson, J. and Drew. P. (1979) Order in Court. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Baker, P. (2006) Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.
Bronnimann, N. (2020) Remorse in parole hearings: an elusive concept with concrete consequences. Missouri Law Review 85(2): 321–356.
Butler, J. (1988) Performative acts and gender constitution. Theatre Journal 40(4): 519–531. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3207893
Cannato, V. (2018) ‘No one helped’: Kitty Genovese, New York City, and the myth of urban apathy. Italian American Review 8(1): 98–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.5406/italamerrevi.8.1.0098
Canning, P. (2021) Writing up or writing off crimes of domestic violence? A transitivity analysis of police reports. Language and Law / Linguagem e Direito 8(2): 48–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.21747/21833745/lanlaw8_2a3
Caplan, J. (2007) What factors affect parole: a review of empirical research. Federal Probation 71(1): 16–19.
Chaemsaithong, K. and Kim, Y. (2018) ‘It was him’: representational strategies, identity, and legitimization in the Boston Marathon bombing trial narratives. Language and Literature 27(4): 286–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947018794095
Clemmer, D. (1940) The Prison Community. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Cook, K. (2014) Kitty Genovese: The Murder, the Bystanders, the Crime that Changed America. New York: Norton & Co.
Cornell Law School. (2022) Indeterminate Sentence. Retrieved from https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/indeterminate_sentence
Duranti, A. (2004) Agency in language. In A. Duranti (ed.) A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology 451-474. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Eades, D. (2010) Sociolinguistics and the Legal Process. Bristol: MM Textbooks.
Ehrlich, S. (2001) Representing Rape: Language and Sexual Consent. London and New York: Routledge.
Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish. New York: Vintage Books.
Fraser, H. (2018) Forensic transcription: how confident false beliefs about language and speech threaten the right to a fair trial in Australia. Australian Journal of Linguistics 38(4): 586–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2018.1510760
Fraser, H. and Stevenson, B. (2014) The power and persistence of contextual priming. International Journal of Evidence & Proof 18(3): 205–229. https://doi.org/10.1350/IJEP.2014.18.3.453
Garber, R. and Maslach, C. (1977) The parole hearing: decision or justification? Law and Human Behavior 1(3): 261–281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01066627
Goatly, A. and Hiradhar, P. (2016) Critical Reading and Writing in the Digital Age. London: Routledge.
Greene, J. and Dalke, I. (2021) ‘You’re still an angry man’: parole boards and logics of criminalized masculinity. Theoretical Criminology 25(4): 639–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480620910222
Gruber, M. C. (2014) ‘I’m Sorry for What I’ve Done.’ Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Halliday, M. (1994) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Hodder Arnold.
Halliday, M. (2014) Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Routledge.
Halliday, M. and Matthiesen, C. (2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Hodder Arnold.
Hanan, M. (2008) Remorse bias. Missouri Law Review 83(2): 301–358.
Henley, N., Miller, M. and Beazly, J. (1995) Syntax, semantics, and sexual violence: agency and the passive voice. Society of Experimental Social Psychology 14(2): 60–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261927x95141004
Hinton, E. and Cook, D. (2021) The mass criminalization of Black Americans: a historical overview. Annual Review of Criminology 4: 261–286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-060520-033306
Hochul, K. and Annucci, A. (n.d.). Parole board and presumptive release dispositions. Retrieved from https://doccs.ny.gov/system/files/documents/2023/01/2022-the-parole-board-and-presumptive-releases-dispositions.pdf
Hyland, K. (2019) Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Kassin, S. (2017) The killing of Kitty Genovese: what else does this case tell us? Perspectives on Psychological Science 12(3): 374–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616679465
Kelly, L., McIvor, G. and Richard, K. (2020) Prisoners’ understanding and experiences of parole. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health 30: 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.2178
Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubícek, M., Kovár, V., Michelfeit, J., Rychlý, P. and Suchomel, V. (2014) The Sketch Engine: ten years on. Lexicography 1: 7–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9
Komter, M. (1998) Dilemmas in the Courtroom: A Study of Trials of Violent Crime in the Netherlands. New York: Psychology Press.
Kross, E. and Ayduk, O. (2011) Making meaning out of negative experiences by self-distancing. Current Directions in Psychological Science 20(3): 187–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411408883
Lacombe, D. (2013) ‘Mr. S., you do have sexual fantasies?’ The parole hearing and prison treatment of a sex offender at the turn of the 21st century. Canadian Journal of Sociology 38(1): 33–63. https://doi.org/10.2307/canajsocicahican.38.1.33
LaFrance, M. and Hahn, G. (1994) The disappearing agent: gender stereotypes, interpersonal verbs and implicit causality. In C. Roman, S. Juhasz and C. Miller (eds) The Women and Language Debate: A Sourcebook 348–362. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Lavin-Loucks, D. and Levan, K. (2018) Identity, discourse, and rehabilitation in parole hearings in the United States. Journal of Prison Education and Reentry 5(1): 18–40. https://doi.org/10.25771/byad-k017
Martel, J. (2010) Remorse and the production of truth. Punishment and Society 12(4): 414–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474510376139
Matoesian, G. (2001) Law and the Language of Identity: Discourse in the William Kennedy Smith Rape Trial. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Maynard, D. (1984) Inside Plea Bargaining. New York: Springer.
McFadden, R. (2015) Winston Moseley, who killed Kitty Genovese, dies in prison at 81. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/05/nyregion/winston-moseley-81-killer-of-kitty-genovese-dies-in-prison.html
Medwed, D. (2008) The innocent prisoner’s dilemma: consequences of failing to admit guilt at parole hearings. Iowa Law Review 93(2): 491–557.
New Yorkers United for Justice (2021) Parole in New York: Broken, Costly, and Unjust. Retrieved from https://nyuj.org/resources/parole-in-new-york-broken-costly-and-unjust/
Nook, E., Vidal Bustamante, C., Cho, H. Y. and Somerville, L. (2020) Use of linguistic distancing and cognitive reappraisal strategies during emotion regulation in children, adolescents, and young adults. Emotion 20(4): 525–540. https://doi.org/10.1037/EMO0000570
NPR. (2016) Winston Moseley dies at 81: his crime spurred adoption of the 911 system. Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/2016/04/05/473057061/winston-moseley-dies-at-81-his-crime-spurred-adoption-of-the-911-system?t=1659352595184
O’Connor, P. (1995) Speaking of crime: ‘I don’t know what made me do it’. Discourse & Society 6(3): 429–456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926595006003008
Paratore, L. (2016) ‘Insight’ into Life Crimes. Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law 21(1): 95–125.
Park, J., Ayduk, Ö. and Kross, E. (2015) Stepping back to move forward. Emotion 16(3): 349–364. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000121
Pittner, K. (2016) Einführung in die germanistische Linguistik. Darmstadt: WBG.
Proeve, M. and Tudor, S. (2010) Remorse: Psychological and Jurisprudential Perspectives. London and New York: Routledge.
Rachlinski, J., Guthrie, C. and Wistrich, A. (2013) Contrition in the courtroom: do apologies affect adjudication? Cornell Law Review 98(5): 1189–1244. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2295033
Radelet, M. and Roberts, L. (2016) Parole interviews of sex offenders: the role of impression management. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 12(2): 140–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098303983012002002
Shahane, A. and Denny, B. (2019) Predicting emotional health indicators from linguistic evidence of psychological distancing. Stress and Health 35(2): 200–210. https://doi.org/10.1002/SMI.2855
Shammas, V. (2019) The perils of parole hearings: California lifers, performative disadvantage, and the ideology of insight. Political and Legal Anthropology Review 42(1): 142–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/plar.12275
Silverstein, M. (2001) The ties that bind: family surveillance of Canadian parolees. Sociological Quarterly 42(3): 395–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1533-8525.2001.TB02407.X
Silverstein, M. (2006) Justice in genderland: through a parole looking glass. Symbolic Interaction 29(3): 393–410. https://doi.org/10.1525/SI.2006.29.3.393
US Department of Justice (2015) Parole Hearings. Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov/uspc/parole-hearings
van Leeuwen, T. (2007) Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse & Communication 1(1): 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986
VERBI Software (2022) MAXQDA 2022. Retrieved from https://www.maxqda.com/
Wacquant, L. (2001) Deadly symbiosis: when ghetto and prison meet and mesh. Punishment & Society 3(1): 95–133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14624740122228276
Watson, C. (1982) The presentation of self and the new institutional inmate: an analysis of prisoners’ responses to assessment for release. Symbolic Interaction 5(2): 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1525/SI.1982.5.2.243
Weil, M. (2016) Winston Moseley, convicted in Kitty Genovese murder, dies at 81. Washington Post, 5 April. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/winston-moseley-convicted-in-kitty-genovese-murder-dies-at-81/2016/04/05/925f0aae-fae1-11e5-886f-a037dba38301_story.html
Weisman, R. (2009) Being and doing: the judicial use of remorse to construct character and community. Social and Legal Studies 18(1): 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663908100333
Western, B. (2007) The prison boom and the decline of American citizenship. Society 44: 30–36.
Wodak, R. (2009) Discourse analysis and courtroom interaction. Discourse Processes 3(4): 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538009544498
Wright, R. (2014) Identities, education and reentry (part one of two): identities and performative spaces. Journal of Prison Education and Reentry 1(1): 32–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.15845/jper.v1i1.609
Young, K., Mukamal, D. and Favre-Bulle, T. (2016) predicting parole grants: an analysis of suitability hearings for California’s lifer inmates. Federal Sentencing Reporter 28(4): 268–277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2016.28.4.268
