Using appraisal theory and the texts of Michelle Carter to assist in developing a means of analysing evidence in encouraged suicide cases
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.21783Keywords:
appraisal analysis, encouraged suicide, coerced suicide, forensic linguistics, applied linguisticsAbstract
On 13 July 2014, 18-year-old Conrad Henri Roy III committed suicide by carbon monoxide poisoning. Conrad’s girlfriend, Michelle Carter, was accused of encouraging his suicide through a series of text messages and a phone call insisting Conrad ‘get back in the car’ which was filling with carbon monoxide; she was eventually found guilty on charges of involuntary manslaughter, a charge which sparked discussion around the lack of encouraged suicide legislation. This article examines the text messages between Michelle Carter and Conrad Roy and asks what we can learn from them for the purpose of designing analytical frameworks for courtroom evidence in cases of encouraged suicide. Using the attitude sub-system of appraisal analysis, Carter’s evaluation of emotive states, judgement of Roy’s character and level of value awarded to certain concepts are considered alongside how these appraisals may have been employed to elicit a persuasion response.
References
Bednarek, M. (2006) Evaluation in Media Discourse: Analysis of a Newspaper Corpus. New York: Continuum. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513516041.
Bednarek, M. (2008) Emotion Talk across Corpora. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230285712
Black, S. (1993) Comparing genuine and simulated suicide notes: a new perspective. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 61(4): 699–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.61.4.699
Bloom, K. (2011) Sentiment analysis based on appraisal theory and functional local grammars. PhD thesis, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago.
Cotter, S. (2020) Inyoung You manslaughter-by-texting defense wants to fight back in the press. Boston Herald 21 January [online]. https://www.bostonherald.com/2020/01/21/inyoung-you- manslaughter-by-texting-defense-wants-to-fight-back-in-the-press/ Accessed 16 August 2021.
Dillard, J. P. and Seo, K. (2012) Affect and persuasion. In J. P. Dillard and L. Shen (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Persuasion: Developments in Theory and Practice (2nd ed.) 150–166. London: SAGE Publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452218410
Donaghue, E. (2019) ‘I’ll go die like you want’: disturbing texts read in court as woman arraigned in boyfriend’s suicide. CBS News 22 November [online]. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/inyoung-you-accused-of-texting-boyfriend-alexander-urtula-to-commit-suicide-pleads-not-guilty-today-2019-11-22/ Accessed 2 August 2021.
du Bois, J. W. (2007) The stance triangle. In R. Englebretson (ed.) Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction 139–182. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Co. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.02eng
Gales, T. (2020) ‘Prison has been a proper punishment’: investigating stance in forensic and legal contexts. In M. Coulthard, A. May and R. Sousa-Silva (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics 675–693. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429030581
Grundlingh, L. (2018) Exploring the possibility of using appraisal theory to determine the legitimacy of suicide notes. Lingua 214: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2018.07.004
Halliday, M. A. K. (1970) Language structure and language function. In J. Lyons (ed.) New Horizons in Linguistics 140–165. Harmondsworth: Penguin. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700003716
Halliday, M. A. K. (1973) Explorations in the Functions of Language. London: Edward Arnold. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008413100008203
Hanlon, P. (2020) Second coerced suicide case adds pressure to Conrad’s Law passage. New England Psychologist 5 January [online]. https://www.nepsy.com/articles/second-coerced-suicide-case-adds-urgency-to-conrads-law-passage/ Accessed 16 May 2021.
Iedema, R., Feez, S. and White, P. (1994) Media Literacy (Write it Right Literacy in Industry Project: Stage Two). Sydney: Metropolitan East Region’s disadvantaged schools program.
Leech, G. (1980) Explorations in Semantics and Pragmatics. London: John Benjamins Publishing Co. https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.i.5
Leech, G. (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London and New York: Longman. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315835976
Lowie, W. and Seton, B. (2013) Essential Statistics for Applied Linguistics. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Martin, J. R. (2003) Beyond exchange: appraisal systems in English. In S. Hunston and G. Thompson (eds) Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse 142–175. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Martin, J. R. and Rose, D. (2003) Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause. London: Continuum.
Martin, J. R. and Rose, D. (2007) Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause (2nd ed.). London and New York: Continuum.
Martin, J. R. and White, P. R. (2005) The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Page, R. E. (2003) An analysis of APPRAISAL in childbirth narratives with special consideration of gender and storytelling style. Text 23(2): 211–237. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2003.009
Painter, C. (2003) Developing attitude: an ontogenetic perspective on APPRAISAL’. Text 23(2): 183–209. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2003.008
Wilson, R. (2011) Appraisal theory as a linguistic tool for the analysis of market research interview data. PhD thesis, University of Leeds, UK.
Cases
Commonwealth v. Carter, 52 N.E.3d 1054 (Mass. 2016
