Global interest meets new perspectives
A report on the 15th Biennial Conference of the IAFL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.21387Keywords:
15th Biennial Conference of the IAFLAbstract
Report of the 15th Biennial Conference of the International Association of Forensic Linguists, hosted by the Aston Institute for Forensic Linguistics, Aston University, UK
References
British Association for Applied Linguistics (2021) Recommendations on Good Practice in Applied Linguistics 2021, 4th edition. British Association for Applied Linguistics. Retrieved on 12 October 2021 from https://www.baal.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/BAAL-Good-Practice-Guidelines-2021.pdf
Giménez, R., Elstein, S. and Queralt, S. (2020) The pandemic and the forensic linguistics caseworker’s wellbeing: effects and recommendations. International Journal of Speech Language and the Law 27(2). Retrieved on 12 October 2021 from
https://journals.equinoxpub.com/IJSLL/article/view/42989
Bolck, A. and Stamouli, A. (2017) Likelihood Ratios for categorical evidence; comparison of LR models applied to gunshot residue data. Law, Probability and Risk 16(2-3): 71--90. Retrieved on 12 October 2021 from https://academic.oup.com/lpr/article/16/2-3/71/3861702
Brümmer, N. and du Preez, J. (2006) Application-independent evaluation of speaker detection. Computer Speech & Language 20(2-3): 230--275. Retrieved on 12 October 2021 from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885230805000483
Carne, M. and Ishihara, S. (2020) Feature-Based Forensic Text Comparison Using a Poisson Model for Likelihood Ratio Estimation. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual Workshop of the Australasian language Technology Association 32--42. Retrieved on 12 October 2021 from https://aclanthology.org/2020.alta-1.4/
Fairclough, N. and Wodak, R. (1997) Critical Discourse Analysis. In T. van Dijk (ed.) Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction 258--284. London: Sage.
Grant, T. (2013) TXT 4N6: method, consistency, and distinctiveness in the analysis of sms text messages. Journal of Law and Policy 21(2): 467--494. Retrieved on 12 October 2021 from https://publications.aston.ac.uk/id/eprint/40092/1/2013_Grant_TXT_4N6_Journal_of_Law_and_policy.pdf
Grant, T., Atkins, S., Busso, L. and Petykó, M. (2021) Forensic Linguistic Databank (FoLD). Aston Institute for Forensic Linguistics, Aston University, electronic dataset, Retrieved on 18 January from http://fold.aston.ac.uk/
Halvani, O., Winter, C. and Graner, L. (2017) On the usefulness of compression models for authorship verification. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security 1--10. Retrieved on 12 October 2021 from https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3098954.3104050
Heydon, G. (2005) The Language of Police Interviewing: A Critical Analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Morrison, F. A. (2013) Data correlation for drag coefficient for sphere. Department of Chemical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, 49931. Retrieved on 12 October 2021 from https://pages.mtu.edu/~fmorriso/DataCorrelationForSphereDrag2016.pdf
Mosteller, F. and Wallace, D. L. (1963) Inference in an authorship problem: A comparative study of discrimination methods applied to the authorship of the disputed Federalist Papers. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58(302): 275--309. Retrieved on 12 October 2021 from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01621459.1963.10500849
Stokoe, E. and Edwards, D. (2008) ‘“Did you have permission to smash your neighbour’s door?” Silly questions and their answers in police-suspect interrogations’. Discourse Studies 10(1): 89--111. Retrieved on 5 October 2021 from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1461445607085592
Stringer, R. (2016) Reflection from the field: Trigger warnings in university teaching. Women’s Studies Journal 30(2): 62--66. Retrieved on 12 October 2021 from http://www.wsanz.org.nz/journal/docs/WSANZ302Stringer62-66.pdf
