Effect of a verbatim instruction on earwitness recall
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.21348Keywords:
conversation recall, memory for conversation, verbatim memory, earwitness testimony, fuzzy-trace theoryAbstract
When tasked with recalling a heard conversation, most individuals are unable to remember specific details. In this study, we tested the effect of Verbatim Recall Instruction (VRI) at recall. Drawing on fuzzy-trace theory, we hypothesised that the use of VRI would lead earwitnesses to use their verbatim mnesic trace to produce a more detailed recall. We compared the quantity and the quality of 42 recalls from participants who had received the VRI or the Free Recall Instruction (FRI). We analysed the level of detail of participants’ recall along a fuzzy to verbatim continuum. Results showed that participants having received a VRI recalled information that was more correct and closer to the original phrasing. However, differences in procedure make the VRI difficult to compare with other studies. Methodological differences are accordingly discussed. Findings suggest that VRI encourages the recollection of verbatim traces, in turn benefiting the recall of detailed elements of a conversation. These findings support fuzzy-trace theory.
References
Alonso-Quecuty, M., Hernández-Fernaud, E. and Campos, L. (1997) Child witnesses: Lying about something heard. In S. Redondo, V. Garrido, J. Pérez and R. Barberet (eds) Advances in Psychology and Law: International Contributions 129–135. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110801163.129
Bekerian, D. A. and Dennett, J. L. (1993) The cognitive interview technique: Reviving the issues. Applied Cognitive Psychology 7(4): 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350070403
Benia, L. R., Hauck-Filho, N., Dillenburg, M. and Stein, L. M. (2015) The NICHD investigative interview protocol: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse 24(3): 259–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2015.1006749
Boon, R., Milne, R., Rosloot, E. and Heinsbroek, J. (2020) Demonstrating detail in investigative interviews: An examination of the DeMo technique. Applied Cognitive Psychology 34: 1133–1142. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3700
Brainerd, C. J. and Kingma, J. (1985) On the independence of short-term memory and working memory in cognitive development. Cognitive Psychology 17(2): 210–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(85)90008-8
Brainerd, C. J. and Reyna, V. F. (1988) Generic resources, reconstructive processing, and children’s mental arithmetic. Developmental Psychology 24: 324–334. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.24.3.324
Brainerd, C. J. and Reyna, V. F. (1990) Gist is the grist: Fuzzy-trace theory and the new intuitionism. Developmental Review 10(1): 3–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/02732297(90)90003-M
Brainerd, C. J. and Reyna, V. F. (2002) Fuzzy-trace theory and false memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science 11(5): 164–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/14678721.00192
Brainerd, C. J. and Reyna, V. F. (2004) Fuzzy-trace theory and memory development. Developmental Review 24(4): 396–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2004.08.005
Brainerd, C. J., Wright, R., Reyna, V. F. and Payne, D. G. (2002) Dual-retrieval processes in free and associative recall. Journal of Memory and Language 46(1): 120–152. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2796
Brunel, M., Py, J. and Launay, C. (2013) Cost and benefit of a new instruction for the cognitive interview: The open depth instruction. Psychology, Crime and Law 19(10): 845–863. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2012.684058
Campos, L. and Alonso-Quecuty, M. L. (1998) Knowledge of the crime context: Improving the understanding of why the cognitive interview works. Memory 6(1): 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/741941602
Campos, L. and Alonso-Quecuty, M. L. (1999) The cognitive interview: Much more than simply ‘try again’. Psychology, Crime and Law 5(1–2): 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683169908414993
Campos, L. and Alonso-Quecuty, M. L. (2001) ‘Try again’: The cognitive interview or free recall. In Psychology and Law in a Changing World: New Trends in Theory, Practice and Research 199–208. London: Psychology Press.
Campos, L. and Alonso-Quecuty, M. (2006) Remembering a criminal conversation: Beyond eyewitness testimony. Memory 14(1): 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210444000476
Campos, L. and Alonso-Quecuty, M. L. (2008) Language crimes and the cognitive interview: Testing its efficacy in retrieving a conversational event. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 22(9): 1211–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1430
Clarke, J., Prescott, K. and Milne, R. (2013) How effective is the cognitive interview when used with adults with intellectual disabilities specifically with conversation recall? Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 26(6): 546–556. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12049
Davis, D. and Friedman, R. D. (2007) Memory for conversation: The orphan child of witness memory researchers. In M. P. Toglia, J. D. Read, D. F. Ross and R. C. L. Lindsay (eds) Handbook of Eyewitness Psychology: Memory for Events, vol. 1, 3–52. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Davis, M. R., McMahon, M. and Greenwood, K. M. (2005) The efficacy of mnemonic components of the cognitive interview: Towards a shortened variant for time-critical investigations. Applied Cognitive Psychology 19(1): 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1048
DeVito, J. A. (1965) Comprehension factors in oral and written discourse of skilled communicators. Speech Monographs 32: 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637756509375441
DeVito, J. A. (1966) Psychogrammatical factors in oral and written discourse by skilled communicators. Speech Monographs 33: 73–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637756609375483
DeVito, J. A. (1967) Level of abstraction in spoken and written language. Journal of Communication 17: 354–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1967.tb01193.x
Duke, S. B., Lee, A. S. E. and Pager, C. K. (2007) A picture’s worth a thousand words: Conversational versus eyewitness testimony in criminal convictions. Faculty Scholarship Series. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/5234
Ebbesen, E. B. and Rienick, C. B. (1998) Retention interval and eyewitness memory for events and personal identifying attributes. Journal of Applied Psychology 83(5): 745–762. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/0021-9010.83.5.745
Edwards, D., and Potter, J. (1992) The chancellor’s memory: Rhetoric and truth in discursive remembering. Applied Cognitive Psychology 6(3): 187–215. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350060303
Evans, J. R., Houston, K. A., Meissner, C. A., Ross, A. B., LaBianca, J. R., Woestehoff, S. A., and Kleinman, S. M. (2014) An empirical evaluation of intelligence-gathering interrogation techniques from the United States Army field manual. Applied Cognitive Psychology 28(6): 867–875. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3065
Evans, J. R., Meissner, C. A., Brandon, S., Russano, M. B. and Kleinman, S. (2010). Criminal versus HUMINT interrogations: The importance of psychological science to improving interrogative practice. Journal of Psychiatry and Law 38: 215–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/00931853100380011
Evans, J. R., Meissner, C. A., Ross, A. B., Houston, K. A., Russano, M. B. and Horgan, A. J. (2013) Obtaining guilty knowledge in human intelligence interrogations: Comparing accusatorial and information-gathering approaches with a novel experimental paradigm. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 2(2): 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.03.002
Ferreira, F. and Patson, N. D. (2007) The ‘good enough’ approach to language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass 1(1–2): 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00007.x
Ferreira, F., Bailey, K. G. and Ferraro, V. (2002) Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science 11(1): 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00158
Fisher, R. P. and Geiselman, R. E. (1992) Memory Enhancing Techniques for Investigative Interviewing: The Cognitive Interview. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher. https://doi.org/10.1037/033663
Fisher, R. P. and Geiselman, R. E. (2010) The cognitive interview method of conducting police interviews: Eliciting extensive information and promoting therapeutic jurisprudence. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 33(5–6): 321–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.09.004
Fletcher, C. R. and Chrysler, S. T. (1990) Surface forms, textbases, and situation models: Recognition memory for three types of textual information. Discourse processes 13(2): 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539009544752
Gabbert, F., Hope, L. and Fisher, R. P. (2009) Protecting eyewitness evidence: Examining the efficacy of a self-administered interview tool. Law and Human Behavior 33(4): 298–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-008-9146-8
Gabbert, F., Hope, L., Fisher, R. P. and Jamieson, K. (2012) Protecting against misleading post-event information with a self-administered interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology 26(4): 568–575. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2828
Geiselman, R. E., Fisher, R. P., Firstenberg, I., Hutton, L. A., Sullivan, S. J., Avetissian, I. and Prosk, A. (1984) Enhancement of eyewitness memory: An empirical evaluation of the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science and Administration 12: 74–80. http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=93116
Geiselman, R., Fisher, R., MacKinnon, D. and Holland, H. (1986) Enhancement of memory with the Cognitive Interview. American Journal of Psychology 99(3): 385–401. https://doi.org/10.2307/1422492
Goldsmith, M., Koriat, A. and Weinberg-Eliezer, A. (2002). Strategic regulation of grain size memory reporting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 131(1): 73–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.131.1.73
Henry, L. A. and Gudjonsson, G. H. (2004) The effects of memory trace strength on eyewitness recall in children with and without intellectual disabilities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 89(1): 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2004.05.002
Hernández-Fernaud, E. and Alonso-Quecuty, M. (1997) The cognitive interview and lie detection: A new magnifying glass for Sherlock Holmes? Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 11(1): 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199702)11:1<55::AIDACP423>3.0.CO;2-G
Hernández-Fernaud, E. and Alonso-Quecuty, M. (1998) Cognitive Interview: Confronting true and false. Psychology and Criminal Justice: International Review of Theory and Practice 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110804799
Hirst, W. and Gluck, D. (1999) Revisiting John Dean’s memory. In E. Winograd, R. Fivush and W. Hirst (eds) Ecological Approaches to Cognition: Essays in Honor of Ulric Neisser 253–284. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410604507-17
Hjelmquist, E. and Gidlund, Å. (1985) Free recall of conversations. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 5(3): 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1985.5.3.169
Hope, L., Gabbert, F. and Fisher, R. P. (2011) From laboratory to the street: Capturing witness memory using the Self-Administered Interview. Legal and Criminological Psychology 16(2): 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02015.x
Hope, L., Gabbert, F., Fisher, R. P. and Jamieson, K. (2014) Protecting and enhancing eyewitness memory: The impact of an initial recall attempt on performance in an investigative interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology 28(3): 304–313. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2984
Hope, L., Gabbert, F., Kinninger, M., Kontogianni, F., Bracey, A. and Hanger, A. (2019) Who said what and when? A timeline approach to eliciting information and intelligence about conversations, plots, and plans. Law and Human Behavior 43(3): 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000329
Hope, L., Mullis, R. and Gabbert, F. (2013) Who? What? When? Using a timeline technique to facilitate recall of a complex event. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 2(1): 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.01.002
Huss, M. T. and Weaver, K. A. (1996) Effect of modality in earwitness identification: Memory for verbal and nonverbal auditory stimuli presented in two contexts. Journal of General Psychology 123(4): 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1996.9921280
Kerstholt, J. H., Jansen, N. J., Van Amelsvoort, A. G. and Broeders, A. P. A. (2004) Earwitnesses: Effects of speech duration, retention interval and acoustic environment. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 18(3): 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.974
Kerstholt, J. H., Jansen, N. J., Van Amelsvoort, A. G. and Broeders, A. P. A. (2006). Earwitnesses: Effects of accent, retention and telephone. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 20(2): 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1175
Kintsch, W., Welsch, D., Schmalhofer, F. and Zimny, S. (1990). Sentence memory: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Memory and Language 29(2): 133–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(90)90069-C
Koriat, A. and Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review 103(3): 490–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.490
La Rooy, D., Brubacher, S. P., Aromäki-Stratos, A., Cyr, M., Hershkowitz, I., Korkman, J., Myklebust, T., Naka, M., Peixoto, C. E., Roberts, K. P., Stewart, H. and Lamb, M. E. (2015) The NICHD protocol: A review of an internationally-used evidence-based tool for training child forensic interviewers. Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice 1(2): 76–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRPP-01-2015-0001
Launay, C. and Py, J. (2017) Capturing the scene: efficacy test of the re-enactment investigative instruction. Journal of Forensic Practice 19(3): 174–189. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFP-02-2015-0012
Leins, D. A., Fisher, R. P., Pludwinski, L., Rivard, J. and Robertson, B. (2014) Interview protocols to facilitate human intelligence sources’ recollections of meetings. Applied Cognitive Psychology 28(6): 926–935. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3041
Ling, J. and Coombe, A. (2005) Age effects in earwitness recall of a novel conversation. Perceptual and Motor Skills 100(3): 774–776. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.100.3.774776
May, L. and Granhag, P. A. (2016) Techniques for eliciting human intelligence: Examining possible order effects of the Scharff tactics. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 23(2): 275–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2015.1054410
Meissner, C. A., Redlich, A. D., Michael, S. W., Evans, J. R., Camilletti, C. R., Bhatt, S. and Brandon, S. (2014) Accusatorial and information-gathering interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology 10(4): 459–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-014-9207-6
Meitinger, K. and Behr, D. (2016) Comparing cognitive interviewing and online probing. Field Methods 28(4): 363–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x15625866
Memon, A. and Higham, P. A. (1999) A review of the cognitive interview. Psychology, Crime and Law 5(1–2): 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683169908415000
Memon, A. and Yarmey, A. D. (1999) Earwitness recall and identification: Comparison of the cognitive interview and the structured interview. Perceptual and Motor Skills 88(3): 797–807. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1999.88.3.797
Memon, A., Meissner, C. A. and Fraser, J. (2010) The Cognitive Interview: A metaanalytic review and study space analysis of the past 25 years. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 16(4): 340–372. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020518
Miller, J. B. (1996) Memory for conversation. Memory 4: 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/741940999
Miller, J. B. and de Winstanley, P. A. (2002) The role of interpersonal competence in memory for conversation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28(1): 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/741940999
Milne, R. and Bull, R. (2002) Back to basics: A componential analysis of the original cognitive interview mnemonics with three age groups. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 16(7): 743–753. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.825
Neisser, U. (1981) John Dean’s memory: A case study. Cognition 9: 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(81)90011-1
Odinot, G. and Wolters, G. (2006) Repeated recall, retention interval and the accuracyconfidence relation in eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology 20(7): 973–985. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1263
Öhman, L., Eriksson, A. and Granhag, P. A. (2013) Enhancing adults’ and children’s earwitness memory: Examining three types of interviews. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 20(2): 216–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2012.658205
Oleszkiewicz, S., Granhag, P. A. and Kleinman, S. M. (2014) On eliciting intelligence from human sources: Contextualizing the Scharff technique. Applied Cognitive Psychology 28(6): 898–907. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3073
Pezdek, K., and Prull, M. (1993) Fallacies in memory for conversations: Reflections on Clarence Thomas, Anita Hill, and the like. Applied Cognitive Psychology 7(4): 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350070404
Pfeil, K. (2018) The effectiveness of the Self-Administered Interview©: A meta-analytic review and empirical study with older adult witnesses. Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.22056
Philippon, A. C., Cherryman, J., Bull, R. and Vrij, A. (2007). Earwitness identification performance: The effect of language, target, deliberate strategies and indirect measures. Applied Cognitive Psychology 21(4): 539–550. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1296
Prescott, K., Milne, R. and Clarke, J. (2011) How effective is the enhanced cognitive interview when aiding recall retrieval of older adults including memory for conversation? Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling 8(3): 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.142
Py, J., Brunel, M., Launay, C. and Mourato, A. (2016) Optimiser le rappel de conversations criminelles auprès de sources d’informations. [Paper presentation] Journée Attentats Recherche, 28 November, Paris.
Raveh, D. and Lavie, N. (2015) Load-induced inattentional deafness. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 77(2): 483–492. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-0140776-2
Read, J. D. and Connolly, D. A. (2007) The effects of delay on long-term memory for witnessed events. In M. P. Toglia (ed.) The Handbook of Eyewitness Psychology: Memory for Events 117–155. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rechdan, J., Sauerland, M., Hope, L. and Ost, J. (2016) Was that how it happened? Shaping our memory for personal experiences in conversation with others. In-Mind Magazine (English edition) 7(31): 1–5.
Redlich, A. D., Kelly, C. E. and Miller, J. C. (2014) The who, what, and why of human intelligence gathering: Self-reported measures of interrogation methods. Applied Cognitive Psychology 28(6): 817–828. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3040
Reyna, V. F. and Brainerd, C. J. (1995) Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis. Learning and individual Differences 7(1): 1–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/1041-6080(95)90031-4
Rivard, J. R., Fisher, R. P., Robertson, B. and Hirn Mueller, D. (2014) Testing the cognitive interview with professional interviewers: Enhancing recall of specific details of recurring events. Applied Cognitive Psychology 28(6): 917–925. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3026
Ross, M., and Sicoly, F. (1979) Egocentric biases in availability and attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37(3): 322–336. https://doi.org/10.1037/00223514.37.3.322
Russano, M. B., Narchet, F. M., Kleinman, S. M. and Meissner, C. A. (2014) Structured interviews of experienced HUMINT interrogators. Applied Cognitive Psychology 28(6): 847–859. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3069
Sachs, J. S. (1967) Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse. Perception and Psychophysics 2(9): 437–442. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208784
Sillars, A. L., Weisberg, J., Burggraf, C. S. and Zietlow, P. H. (1990) Communication and understanding revisited: Married couples’ understanding and recall of conversations. Communication Research 17(4): 500–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365090017004006
Shuy, R. W. (1993) Language Crimes: The Use and Abuse of Language Evidence in the Courtroom. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Shuy, R. W. (2005) How language crimes are created. In R. W. Shuy (ed.) Creating Language Crimes: How Law Enforcement Uses (and Misuses) Language 3–12. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195181661.003.0001
Stafford, L. and Daly, J. A. (1984) Conversational memory: The effects of recall mode and memory expectancies on remembrances of natural conversations. Human Communication Research 10(3): 379–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1984.tb00024.x
Stafford, L., Burggraf, C. S. and Sharkey, W. F. (1987) Conversational memory: The effects of time, recall, mode, and memory expectancies on remembrances of natural conversations. Human Communication Research 14(2): 203–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1984.tb00024.x
Stevenage, S. V., Clarke, G. and McNeill, A. (2012) The ‘other-accent’ effect in voice recognition. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 24(6): 647–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2012.675321
Tulving, E. and Thomson, D.M. (1973) Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review 77: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0020071
Van Dijk, T. A. and Kintsch, W. (1983) Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Wells, G. L., Memon, A. and Penrod, S. D. (2006) Eyewitness evidence: Improving its probative value. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 7: 45–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00027.x
Yarmey, A. D. (1990) Accuracy and confidence of duration estimates following questions containing marked and unmarked modifiers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 20(14): 1139–1149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1990.tb00396.x
